• 2 minutes California to ban gasoline for lawn mowers, chain saws, leaf blowers, off road equipment, etc.
  • 6 minutes China and India are both needing more coal and prices are now extremely high. They need maximum fossil fuel.
  • 11 minutes Europeans and Americans are beginning to see the results of depending on renewables.
  • 10 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 18 hours Monday 9/13 - "High Natural Gas Prices Today Will Send U.S. Production Soaring Next Year" by Irina Slav
  • 8 hours "A Very Predictable Global Energy Crisis" by Irina Slav --- MUST READ
  • 12 hours Two Good and Plausible Ideas about Saving Water and Redirecting it to Where it is Needed.
  • 2 days Did China cherry-pick the factors that affected the economic slow-down?
  • 11 hours "Here is The Hidden $150 Trillion Agenda Behind The "Crusade" Against Climate Change" - Zero Hedge re: Bank of America REPORT
  • 15 hours Are you aware of Oil Price short videos on our energy topics?
  • 20 hours Is China Rising or Falling? Has it Enraged the World and Lost its Way? How is their Economy Doing?
  • 22 hours NordStream2
  • 4 days U.S. : Employers Can Buy Retirement Security for $2.64 an Hour
  • 411 days Class Act: Bet You've Never Seen A President Do This.
  • 4 days Forecasts for Natural Gas
  • 4 days Australia sues Neoen for lack of power from its Tesla battery
Tsvetana Paraskova

Tsvetana Paraskova

Tsvetana is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing for news outlets such as iNVEZZ and SeeNews. 

More Info

Premium Content

The $60 Trillion Price Tag For A World With Net-Zero Emissions

The world can achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by the middle of this century for an annual investment of US$1 trillion-US$2 trillion, or up to US$60 trillion over the next 30 years, a coalition of major oil firms, companies in other energy-intensive industries, and banks said.

The Energy Transitions Commission (ETC) is a coalition of 45 leaders from energy producers, energy-intensive industries, financial institutions, and environmental advocates, including BP, Shell, Sinopec Capital, Rio Tinto, ArcelorMittal, Bank of America, HSBC, Iberdrola, Ørsted, and Vattenfall.  

In a new report this week, ‘Making Mission Possible,’ the coalition said that “it is undoubtedly technically feasible and economically affordable for the whole world to achieve net-zero GHG emissions by mid-century, with all developed economies meeting that objective by 2050 and all developing economies within the following 10 years.”  

The ETC says that countries and companies have to believe that net-zero is feasible and economically affordable to start planning the policies to get to the net-zero vision. 

The price tag for reaching a global net-zero economy over the next 30 to 40 years sounds monstrously high, but according to the ETC, the additional investments required, “while huge in absolute dollar terms, are only about 1% to 2% of global GDP per annum.”

“The costs of achieving this are very small, especially compared to the large adverse consequences that unmitigated climate change would trigger by 2050 and in subsequent years,” the coalition said in the report.

The biggest investment globally will be needed to build a global power system that can deliver 100,000 TWh per year, including new renewable electricity capacity, transmission and distribution networks, battery storage for flexibility, and additional technology deployment to supply interday and seasonal flexibility. All these investments in the power system would require an additional annual investment of US$1 trillion to US$1.5 trillion per year. The ramp-up of ‘green’ hydrogen production, transport, and storage will also need massive investments of US$3.7 trillion over 30 years, or US$130 billion annually, the coalition said.  

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Pekka Lehtikoski on October 15 2020 said:
    Good article. Maybe this is feasible, the approach to global power gid with sufficient backup storage might really work. Cost figures sound big enough to be calculated.
    Few points where this might fail: It requires global agreement, the US, China, Europe, and Russia working together and paying the bill for the rest of the world (people have more immediate issues in less wealthy parts of the world, they cannot finance a project like this). Lithium battery technology will not scale up for this, even there is a lot of lithium it is not an endless resource.
    A cheaper and easier approach would be a combination of wind/solar/natural gas. No need for cooperation/global grid/batteries. Not a net-zero technology, but might cut CO2 emissions by the order of 30% or so.

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News