• 4 minutes Europeans and Americans are beginning to see the results of depending on renewables.
  • 7 minutes Is China Rising or Falling? Has it Enraged the World and Lost its Way? How is their Economy Doing?
  • 13 minutes NordStream2
  • 15 hours Monday 9/13 - "High Natural Gas Prices Today Will Send U.S. Production Soaring Next Year" by Irina Slav
  • 12 hours California to ban gasoline for lawn mowers, chain saws, leaf blowers, off road equipment, etc.
  • 15 hours "Here is The Hidden $150 Trillion Agenda Behind The "Crusade" Against Climate Change" - Zero Hedge re: Bank of America REPORT
  • 33 mins GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 4 days "A Very Predictable Global Energy Crisis" by Irina Slav --- MUST READ
  • 1 day U.S. : Employers Can Buy Retirement Security for $2.64 an Hour
  • 1 day Nord Stream - US/German consultations
  • 3 days An Indian Opinion on What is Going on in China
  • 4 days Can Technology Keep Coal Plants Alive and Well?
  • 5 days Succession Planning in Human Resources for Vaccinated Individuals in the Oil & Gas Industry
  • 17 hours Forecasts for Natural Gas
  • 1 day Australia sues Neoen for lack of power from its Tesla battery
  • 4 days Storage of gas cylinders
  • 5 days Two Good and Plausible Ideas about Saving Water and Redirecting it to Where it is Needed.
Alex Kimani

Alex Kimani

Alex Kimani is a veteran finance writer, investor, engineer and researcher for Safehaven.com. 

More Info

Premium Content

Britain’s Richest Man Plans To Make Hydrogen Cars Mainstream

Hydrogen has been touted for decades as the future of mobility. In fact, there was a time when hydrogen was presumed to be “the fuel of the future,” while EVs were expected to remain confined to a niche of small, short-range urban cars. Yet, it’s battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) that have hit the fast lane. Meanwhile, their hydrogen-powered brethren appear to have stalled on the starting line. 

Case in point: Some 330,000 plug-in electric cars were sold in the United States in 2019 compared with just 8,000 FCEVs. But that might be about to change. Hyundai Motors (OTC:HYMTF) has partnered with British multinational chemicals company Ineos Group to give the FCEV sector a badly needed boost in the race to becoming mainstream.

Hyundai is the world’s second-largest producer of FCEVs with a 12.1% share of the market, second only to Toyota Motors (NYSE:TM) with 76.6% market share, while Honda Motor Co. (NYSE:HMC) owns an 11.3% slice of the market.

Meanwhile, Ineos, a global manufacturer of petrochemicals, specialty chemicals, and oil products, is owned by Britain’s richest man, Jim Ratcliffe.

Source: EDI Weekly

The hydrogen promise

Through the partnership, Ineos will supply hydrogen to Hyundai as it looks to expand its FCEV footprint. Ineos already manufactures 300,000 tons of hydrogen annually as a byproduct from the electrolysis of brine to make chlorine. The company currently uses it for fuel as well as in the desulfurization at refineries. The company owns massive underground gas-storage caverns that it could use to store the hydrogen.

Some readers might squawk at this as just another me-too project by the hydrogen camp given the host of cost, technical, and infrastructure hurdles that the sector is yet to overcome.

Related: Climate Targets Could Slash Natural Gas Investment By $1 Trillion For instance, the most popular FCEV, the Toyota Mirai, comes with a base price of nearly $60,000—$20,000 higher than the Model 3 Standard Range Plus, which carries a base price of $39,990. Running costs are not cheap either: The “rack rate” to refill a Toyota Mirai or Honda Clarity runs north of $50, which might be competitive in an era when gas prices are in the vicinity of $4 per gallon, but not with prices near $2 a gallon like the United States has today. Fueling infrastructure is woefully lacking as well, with California boasting a grand total of 40 public hydrogen fueling stations compared to nearly 21,000 EV charging stations. Mind you that California is currently the only state in the United States that has a network of hydrogen fueling stations, maybe because the hydrogen sector tends to get more than its fair share of negative publicity despite a rather decent track record overall.

Then there’s that seemingly insurmountable technical hurdle: Low efficiency. FCEVs are only half as efficient as BEVs when you look at the entire power-to-vehicle-drive energy chain.

FCEV Energy vector transition

BEV Energy vector transition

Source: The Conversation

Still, a growing number of experts see FCEVs playing an important role in decarbonizing the transport sector alongside BEVs.

Related: Something Highly Unusual Just Happened To Chinese Crude Stockpiles 

FCEVs come with several strong selling points, including running much cleaner than internal combustion engines (ICEs), offer greater driving range, particularly in heavier vehicles, and also take a much shorter time to refuel compared to conventional electric vehicles. For instance, the 2019 Hyundai Nexo offers 5-passenger seating, 380 miles (612 km) of driving range, and a hydrogen refueling time of ~5 minutes. It’s been described as a no-compromise FCV wrapped in an appealing crossover design that provides ample passenger and cargo space.

Hyundai aims to capture ~15% of the hydrogen-fueled truck market in Europe by 2030, mainly targeting countries like Germany and the Netherlands. 

Meanwhile, Ineos plans to leverage Hyundai’s FCEV technology to integrate it into the Grenadier, an SUV fashioned after the Land Rover Defender that the company hoped to debut in 2021.

The global FCEV market was valued at just 652M in 2018 but is expected to expand at a brisk 67% CAGR to hit $42B by 2026, driven by the ESG trend, the high initial investment in infrastructure, an increase in government initiatives for the development of hydrogen fuel cell infrastructure, and technological advancement and future potential. 

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • John Brewer on November 26 2020 said:
    FCEV Energy vector transition charts don't account for storage of hydrogen.
  • Henry Hewitt on December 01 2020 said:
    He won't be Britain's richest man much longer. The burden of proof, and I'm being generous because it ain't gonna happen (that's American for 'not bloody likely'), is to top an EV with 10 moving parts that costs 2 cents per mile to operate and that is with 8-cent kilowatt-hours.

    With a 3-cent kWh you can go a mile for less than a penny. Not that ICE-age cars are going to matter much longer, but at 35 mpg and petrol at $2.50 you are now paying 7 cents and you still have to take care of those 1,000 parts. When I put PV on the rooftop (On Dasher and Dancer and Prancer and Vixen), ie, PV4EV, pretty soon those miles won't cost a thing.

    Pull up, Dude; it's a fool's errand. "Get a roof." Horses require too much grass.

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News