• 2 hours Senior Interior Dept. Official Says Florida Still On Trump’s Draft Drilling Plan
  • 4 hours Schlumberger Optimistic In 2018 For Oilfield Services Businesses
  • 6 hours Only 1/3 Of Oil Patch Jobs To Return To Canada After Downturn Ends
  • 9 hours Statoil, YPF Finalize Joint Vaca Muerta Development Deal
  • 10 hours TransCanada Boasts Long-Term Commitments For Keystone XL
  • 12 hours Nigeria Files Suit Against JP Morgan Over Oil Field Sale
  • 19 hours Chinese Oil Ships Found Violating UN Sanctions On North Korea
  • 24 hours Oil Slick From Iranian Tanker Explosion Is Now The Size Of Paris
  • 1 day Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 1 day Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 1 day OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 1 day Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 1 day Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 2 days Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 2 days API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 2 days Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 2 days EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 2 days IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 2 days Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 2 days Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 2 days Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 3 days Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 3 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 3 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 3 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 3 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 3 days India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 3 days India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 4 days Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 4 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 4 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 4 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 4 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 4 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 4 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 4 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
  • 5 days Iranian Oil Tanker Sinks After Second Explosion
  • 7 days Russia To Discuss Possible Exit From OPEC Deal
  • 7 days Iranian Oil Tanker Drifts Into Japanese Waters As Fires Rage On
  • 7 days IEA: $65-70 Oil Could Cause Surge In U.S. Shale Production
Alt Text

Nuclear Power's Resurgence In The Middle East

While nuclear power loses popularity…

Alt Text

Is This The End Of Nuclear Power In The UK?

The UK has been planning…

Alt Text

Are Higher Uranium Prices Around The Corner?

The world’s largest uranium producer…

Will New Chinese Nuclear Reactor Design Crush Western Competition?

Will New Chinese Nuclear Reactor Design Crush Western Competition?

Since the 11 March 2011 Japanese Fukushima Daiichi nuclear catastrophe, the global nuclear civilian power industry has absorbed the negative publicity and is set to grow over the next several decades.

According to a May 2012 report issued by the U.S. government’s Energy Information Administration, “Nuclear generating capacity additions began in the 1950s and now top 346 gigawatts worldwide. The first nuclear reactor to produce electricity was a very small experimental reactor in the United States in 1951. Currently, 30 countries have nuclear power programs… Plans to add new nuclear capacity in North America and Europe are relatively small in comparison to those in such countries as China, Korea, and India. Projected increased electricity demand in rapidly developing countries coupled with energy security awareness and the desire to limit carbon emissions are contributing to the worldwide addition of new nuclear capacity.”

China currently has 15 operating nuclear power plants (NPPs) that provide roughly 12.5 gigawatts of generating capacity, and another 26 reactors currently under construction that will add another 30 gigawatts to the national grid. According to the pro nuclear industry World Nuclear Association, “additional reactors are planned, including some of the world's most advanced, to give a five- or six-fold increase in nuclear capacity to at least 60 gigawatts by 2020, then 200 gigawatts by 2030, and 400 gigawatts by 2050.

Now China may be preparing to infiltrate one of the West’s last technological areas of expertise, the construction of nuclear power plants. In the intense struggle for business in the Third World, Beijing may well score against such formerly high profile nuclear exporting companies as Westinghouse, Areva and Rosatomstrpoiekhsport.

Currently, there are 435 nuclear power reactors operating in 21 nations, with a combined capacity of over 370 gigawatt hours. In 2011 these provided 2518 billion kilowatt hours, roughly 13.5 percent of global electricity needs, with another 60+ power reactors are currently being constructed in 14 countries, including China, South Korea and the Russian Federation.

Related Article: Germany's Nuke Plants Closed, but - Where to Store their Waste?

Accordingly, the potential global nuclear energy power market is worth hundreds of billions of dollars, which advanced countries felt was theirs to exploit.

Enter China, which could undercut the current Western monopoly.

China has come a long way in advancing its industrial base since the early 1960s, when
Mao Tse Tung advocated that peasants build backyard steel blast furnaces, which Soviet ally Nikita Khrushchev derisively dismissed as ‘samovar capitalism.”

China’s burgeoning industrial base now includes an indigenously developed manned space flight, the third in the world behind the U.S. and Russia.

And now Huaneng Shandong Shidao Bay Nuclear Power Co Ltd. is developing a $476 million civilian nuclear power project that will be the first in the world to put a reactor with fourth-generation features into commercial production.

Proponents of 4th generation nuclear reactors include Bill Gates, whose Terrapower company is collaborating with Chinese scientists on the design and who noted in December 2011, "The idea is to be very low cost, very safe and generate very little waste," with the reactor design, under study by Terrapower requiring no enriched uranium, as its fuel would be depleted uranium, greatly diminishing nuclear waste output.

Related Article: US Sailors Sue Over Fukushima Radiation

China has already proven the feasibility of its 4th generation reactor concept by bring a small 20 megawatt prototype online in July 2011 after a year of testing.

What is HSNPC constructing? According to HSNPC, the Shidao Bay nuclear power plant, with a designed capacity of 200 megawatts and "the characteristics of fourth-generation nuclear energy systems," the high-temperature gas-cooled NPP reactor will start generating power by the end of 2017, raising electricity generation efficiency to roughly 40 percent from the current 30-percent level of second- and third-generation reactors.

Why should the West be concerned?

A HSNPC public relations spokesman, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that if the project is successful, “the reactor's technology and equipment can be exported to other countries in the future. That will be a great boost to China's nuclear industry, as a very high percentage of the equipment is produced domestically instead of being imported.”

Originally scheduled to be launched in 2011, the construction of the Shidao Bay NPP was delayed after Fukushima, but in October 2011 China’s government began to reconsider nuclear energy in its efforts to fulfill rising demands, putting the Shidao Bay project through on-site checks in accident prevention and emergency management, with the proposed facility passing government safety inspections.

Given China’s unique blend of state socialism and capitalism, officials at Westinghouse, Areva and Rosatomstrpoiekhsport have a right to be nervous.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • David B. Benson on January 10 2013 said:
    First the gas cooling has to be demonstrated successfully. This might actually happen.

    However, it is unlikely that a mere 200 mW unit will find high appeal except in developing countries which simply cannot afford a larger unit.

    There might be some but Rosatom has a unique financial incentive plan. Check out Bangladesh and Turkey. Unless the Chinese can do the same (probably, if they wish), the developing countries will continue to first look to Rosatom, as Vietnam has.

    Finally, the Chinese are going to have to establish a track record of safe, reliable operation before they'll find much in the way of foreign sales.
  • harrywr2 on January 11 2013 said:
    The Chinese HTR-PM isn't a 'revolutionary' design.

    Pebble Bed reactors have been looked at by the South Africans and Germans and the US DOE had done testing on pebble bed fuels.

    Gas reactors likewise have been researched and demonstrated in the West.

    Many of the features of the Chinese HTR-PM have been considered for the US-NGNP.

    The problem in the US is that there currently not sufficient demand for new generating capacity to justify a commercial fuel fabrication facility for other then a LWR.

    No US utility wants to get stuck having to support a commercial scale fuel fabrication facility for a 'one of' reactor.

    There isn't really a market in the US for 100GW of baseload anything.

    The Chinese don't have this problem. Their market for baseload is almost unlimited at this point.

    The Chinse HTR-PM has cost profiles similar to Gen II reactors but inherent safety higher then a Gen III+ reactor.

    Will it work? How many years of 'teething pains' will the Chinese have to endure? Who knows.

    I wish them luck. If it works maybe the US DOE will dust off 'on hold' plans for a High Temperature Pebble Bed Modular Reactor.
  • Randy on January 11 2013 said:
    "Given China’s unique blend of state socialism and capitalism, officials at Westinghouse, Areva and Rosatomstrpoiekhsport have a right to be nervous."

    Unique blend? What? It's a one party dictatorship! Wouldn't it be lovely to have a one party dictatorship here as well? No environmentalists. No lawyers with class action law suits. It's easy. Wanna build the Three Gorges dam? Hey, no problem. Who's gonna protest? Environmental regs? pfffft! It seems that John Daly has fallen in love with powerful, one party state governments. Admires them. Admires their efficiency. Everything is so damn easy to do. Maybe we should just scrap our silly government? To hell with it all. It's so much better the Chinese way.
  • SA Kiteman on January 11 2013 said:
    A 200 milliWatt unit is useless everywhere, but a 200 megaWatt unit is very useful in many many places. Factory made Small Modular Reactors could well be the saving technology for Nuclear Power. LFTRs (Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors) could become the front runner for the genre. We can hope!
  • SA Kiteman on January 11 2013 said:
    HarryWR2 wrote:
    There isn't really a market in the US for 100GW of baseload anything.

    Tell that to the folks that are dying to replace petroleum imports with... something, ANYthing, else. Oh, and maybe if we had access to a 100 GW of added baseload, some of the energy intensive industries would come back. Alcoa? You listening? Alcan? Rio Tinto?
  • SA Kiteman on January 11 2013 said:
    HarryWR2 wrote:
    No US utility wants to get stuck having to support a commercial scale fuel fabrication facility for a 'one of' reactor.

    That is one of the truly nice things about LFTRs, no fuel fabrication required! Dump Thorium(IV)Fluoride into the molten blanket, transfer bred UF4 via fluoride volatility from the blanket to the molten core. Continue on.

    And 100MW units are a great size to build. They could be factory built and ConEx Box delivered.
  • Atomikrabbit on January 11 2013 said:
    "the reactor design, under study by Terrapower requiring no enriched uranium, as its fuel would be depleted uranium"

    A major technical error in an otherwise informative article. The bad news is that, as a subset of fast reactors, the TerraPower design needs about 10% of its fuel load in the form of highly-enriched fissile material, such as U233, U235, or Pu239. And it will be sodium cooled. Wait until the "environmentalists" wrap their propaganda arms around that!

    The good news is "TerraPower has estimated that the Paducah enrichment facility [depleted uranium] stockpile alone represents an energy resource equivalent to $100 trillion worth of electricity". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traveling_wave_reactor
  • Victor on January 21 2013 said:
    Key words in the piece are "If the project is successful"
    'couse this technology is known for many decades (started by germans if I'm not mistaken) and till now no one could prove its viability.. I doubt that China can.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News