• 3 minutes Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 7 minutes Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 12 minutes Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 21 hours Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 27 mins Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 25 mins Oil prices going Up? NO!
  • 1 day Tesla Closing a Dozen Solar Facilities in Nine States
  • 21 hours Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 23 hours EU Leaders Set To Prolong Russia Sanctions Again
  • 21 hours Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 21 hours Oil Buyers Club
  • 1 day Why is permian oil "locked in" when refineries abound?
  • 1 day Saudi Arabia plans to physically cut off Qatar by moat, nuclear waste and military base
  • 14 hours Oil prices going down
  • 1 day EVs Could Help Coal Demand
  • 19 hours Saudi Arabia turns to solar
  • 12 hours Russia's Energy Minister says Oil Prices Balanced at $75, so Wants to Increase OPEC + Russia Oil by 1.5 mbpd
  • 1 day China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
  • 7 hours Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
Alt Text

Why There Won’t Be An OPEC For Battery Metals

A very dynamic market, quickly…

Alt Text

Trump Sparks Fight Over Nuclear Mountain

Nuclear power experts have proposed…

Alt Text

Trump May Have Unintentionally Killed U.S. Nuclear

As President Trump takes aim…

John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Water Shortages May End Jordan’s Nuclear Power Hopes

Water Shortages May End Jordan’s Nuclear Power Hopes

Beginning in 2004 the Jordanian government began studying the Kingdom’s options to meet its rising energy needs, with nuclear power as one of the possibilities. Three years later King Abdullah II stated that Jordan was “looking at nuclear power for peaceful and energy purposes” and by the end of 2007 the government issued a revised and updated National Master Strategy of Energy, which called for six percent of Jordan’s electrical output to come from nuclear power by 2020.

Four years later, in September 2011 the Jordan Atomic Energy Commission (JAEC) issued a “White Paper on Nuclear Energy in Jordan” describing the results of a pre-feasibility study and further elaborating a national policy rationale for nuclear energy.

Now?

Jordan has completed the first stage of a tender for its nuclear energy program and intends to have at least one reactor connected to the grid by 2020. JAEC’s proposal is to have a 700-1200 MW reactor operating by 2020, and a second by 2025.

Related article: Japan-India Nuclear Deal, Last Piece in Corporate Nuclear Game

By any measure, Jordan’s energy situation is grim. The U.S. government’s Energy Information Administration notes, “Jordan, unlike its immediate neighbors, does not possess significant energy resources… As a result of its lack of significant energy resources, Jordan relies heavily on imports of crude oil, petroleum products, and natural gas to meet domestic energy demand.

Not have those imports been immune from the political turmoil sweeping the region. Following the outbreak of the Arab Spring two years ago, the Arab Gas Pipeline, which transports natural gas from Egypt to Jordan, has been attacked numerous times, forcing Jordan to spend increasing amounts of scarce hard currency on back-up fossil fuels for power generation, just at a time when oil prices have been increasing. Over the past two years the country has spent at least $1.4 billion on heavy fuel oil and diesel to replace lost gas from the AGP.

Adding to the allure of nuclear energy is Jordan’s discovery of uranium resources, which the government views as a potentially secure, domestic fuel source for its reactors, as well as a revenue source for funding its first nuclear power plant.

But some in the Kingdom are expressing sticker shock at the projected costs of embracing nuclear power, as Jordan’s worsening economic situation increases public concerns over how Jordan can afford a nuclear power program now estimated to cost at least $5 billion, with many arguing that the Kingdom should deploy more renewable energy resources instead.

Accordingly, Jordan’s policy makers have come under increasing pressure from the public to justify the enormous expenditure. With decreasing political and financial support, concerns about Jordan’s ambitious nuclear program have multiplied.

What may ultimately doom Jordan’s nuclear ambitions, however, is a resource even more scarce in the Kingdom than uranium – water.

Jordan's Minister of Water Hazem Nasser has noted, “We live in a chronic water problem. And we are now at the edge of moving from a chronic water problem into a water crisis.”

Jordan’s Royal Commission for Water noted in its report, “Water for Life: Jordan’s Water Strategy, 2008-2022” that the Kingdom has an annual per capita water supply of 145 cubic meters. To put this figure in context, the United Nations describes nations with less than 500 cubic meters per person per year as having an "absolute scarcity" of water.

Fourteen years ago King Abdullah II commented, "Our Water situation forms a strategic challenge that cannot be ignored. We have to balance between drinking water needs and industrial and irrigation water requirements. Drinking water remains the most essential and the highest priority issue."

Related article: Regulations Scupper Buffett’s Iowa Nuclear Plans

And the shortages continue. Jordan’s Minister of Water and Irrigation HE Raed Abu Saud noted in the strategy report, “Jordan has very limited water resources. In 2007 the Demand exceeded Resources by 638 million cubic meters/year and the Allocations exceeded Resources by 73 million cubic meters… Water is an essential commodity for Municipal, Industrial and Agricultural uses. The increasing water deficit year-on-year poses a serious future threat that will impact all sectors.”

And nuclear power plants, whatever their design, are significant users of water for cooling purposes. Safa Al Jayoussi, an activist with Greenpeace in Jordan, succinctly summed up the issue, noting, "Nuclear power plants require large quantities of cooling water, usually from a large river or a large lake. But, in Jordan, we don't really have any sources of water."

While Jordan’s nascent nuclear power industry has its advocates, it may well be water, the Middle East’s most precious resource, rather than fiscal issues that shoves the country’s nuclear hopes farther into the future. As King Abdullah II noted, potable water “remains the most essential and the highest priority issue" and no one at the Water Ministry has yet advanced a plan how the Kingdom might make up its annual water deficit of 73 million cubic meters.

By. John C.K Daly of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • David B. Benson on June 18 2013 said:
    Could use air cooling. Even better, although quite expensive, is a closed, ground loop cooler.
  • SA Kiteman on June 18 2013 said:
    Jordan should contact Flibe Energy to seriously consider building Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors which because of their high operating temperatures can efficiently generate power while discharging the heat to the atmosphere. No water required. The highish discharge temperature is also good for desalination. Energy AND fresh water too. Two things in great demand provided by one machine!
  • Dario jinchuk on June 19 2013 said:
    All fossil power plants also need water for coling. Nuclears can be cooled by sea water, and this is the case for Jordan according to the siting being considered at the Red Sea.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News