• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 4 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 9 hours The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 2 days China deletes leaked stats showing plunging birth rate for 2023
  • 1 day The European Union is exceptional in its political divide. Examples are apparent in Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Netherlands, Belarus, Ireland, etc.
  • 6 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
Scientists Inch Closer to the Holy Grail of Clean Energy

Scientists Inch Closer to the Holy Grail of Clean Energy

Recent breakthroughs in nuclear fusion…

U.S. Pushes to Triple Nuclear Energy Production by 2050

U.S. Pushes to Triple Nuclear Energy Production by 2050

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer's plan…

John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

Premium Content

Taiwanese Strongly Opposed to Expansion of Nuclear Power

Taiwanese Strongly Opposed to Expansion of Nuclear Power

March 11 marked the second anniversary of the nuclear catastrophe at Tokyo Electric Power Company’s six reactor Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, when a tsunami effectively destroyed the site on Japan’s eastern Pacific coast.

Since then, TEPCO and the Japanese government have released information in dribs and drabs, leading to the overall impression that the problem is contained, despite such alarming news released by TEPCO that last week it detected a record 740,000 becquerels per kilogram of radioactive cesium in a fish caught in waters near the Fukushima Daiichi NPP, equivalent to 7,400 times the state-set limit deemed safe for human consumption.

So, fishermen are voluntarily suspending operations off the coast of Fukushima prefecture except for experimental catches.

But there is one Asian country where the citizenry have apparently absorbed the lessons of Fukushima, and are mobilizing to prevent a further expansion of the country’s nuclear power program.


Related article: MIT Develops Meltdown-Proof, Nuclear Waste-Eating Reactor

On 16 March, over 220,000 Taiwanese flooded the streets of the capital Taipei, demanding the government abandon nuclear power.

The United States has 104 NPPs in operation, France - 58, Japan’s (all except two currently offline) 54, Russia 32, South Korea 20, India 19, Canada 18, Germany 17 (all now offline), China 11, Taiwan three and Pakistan two, while nations with nuclear power reactors under construction include China with 23, Russia - nine, South Korea – six, India four and Taiwan -one.

What are the risks of expanding nuclear power in Taiwan?

Simple, two – nuclear storage and…nature.

Currently, all Taiwanese NPPs store their spent fuel onsite.


According to Taiwan’s Central Weather Bureau, “383 typhoons hit Taiwan in the past hundred some years, with an annual average hit frequency of 3 to 4 times. The maximum number of occurrences was in 1914 with 8 hits, and no hits occurred in 1941 and 1964.”

Taiwanese authorities are apparently listening to their disaffected citizenry. Last week Premier Jiang Yi-huah said that if the country's NPPs stop operations after 40 years of use, their current licensing period, Taiwan can look forward to being a non-nuclear country by 2055.

Related article: France Predict Cost of Nuclear Disaster to be Over Three Times their GDP

Still, some analysts are concerned that the abandonment of nuclear power could have a detrimental impact on the island's economy.  Chung Hua Institution for Economic Research chairman Dr. Liang Chi Yuan commented, "A 40 per cent increase in electricity price will cost the economic growth to contract by 0.68 per cent, and it will inflate the consumer price index by over one per cent. That's just the electricity price. Taiwan would also experience a power shortage, which would discourage industries to invest. Besides higher costs, renewable energies are not stable sources of power -- thus it cannot completely substitute nuclear power. You will need to have more capacity and facilities for standby power. That would mean additional cost. Then you will need to build more power transmission channels. That's more cost they didn't take into account."


Taking a differing view, National Taiwan University Professor Chou Kuei Tien observed, "Nuclear power may be seen as a relatively clean source of energy based on its carbon emission, but if you take into account of the disposal of nuclear waste and the cost of building nuclear power plants, nuclear power is not really cheap and clean."

Taiwan was China’s ‘economic miracle” before the mainland adopted structural reforms. Its well-read citizenry have apparently read the reports of their neighbor’s 2011 nuclear traumas carefully, and are expressing their concerns with “feet in the street.”

Not a lesson that should be lost in light of the “nothing to see here” news emanating from Japan.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Hans Bickel on March 20 2013 said:
    All of the current energy options have serious problems or shortcomings, a situation that suggests progress towards sustainable energy production could be accelerated by a united effort to discover and develop more efficient and safe energy technology.

    The basis for a new energy technology that transcends the problems associated with traditional sources of energy, including the nuclear option, already exists. What is lacking is international focus and support for developing and bringing such new technology to the marketplace.

    Dr. Hans Bickel, U.S. Department of Energy, Retired.
  • Guest on March 20 2013 said:
    Quote from the article:

    "Still, some analysts are concerned that the abandonment of nuclear power could have a detrimental impact on the island's economy."

    Why don't those same analysts consider the deterimental impact of a nuclear-plant-meltdown on their economy.

    Japan's meltdowns will end up costing them trillions.
  • SA Kiteman on March 23 2013 said:
    One used to think the taiwanese were smart. Japan has been economically devistated by their decision to shut down their power plants. Their trade balance is negative, significantly so, for the first time in a LONG time, all due to the need to import fossil fuels to replace their abandoned NPPs.

    If the Taiwanese are so scared of the low probabiliti event, perhaps they should replace Light Water Reactors with Liquid Fluoride Thorium Recyclers. LFTRs are immune to the type of accident that afflicted Fukushima Daiichi. Thus they could have their "safe" and "heat" it too.
  • No Nukes on March 27 2013 said:
    Concerned citizens are asking the world to join us in stopping another nuclear disaster.

    Click here to find out more and sign: http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/No_New_Nuclear_Power_Plants_in_Taiwan_End_Use_of_Nuclear_Power_in_Taiwan/?khgdkeb

    Share the link with your all your family, friends and contacts. The more that sign, the greater the support. The greater the support, the more strength the petition has. A powerful petition can make a difference.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News