• 4 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 7 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 11 minutes Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 14 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 47 mins Trump needs to educate US companies and citizens on Chinese Communist Party and People's Liberation Army. This is real ECONOMIC WARFARE. To understand Chinese warfare read General Sun Tzu's "Art of War" . . . written 500 B.C.
  • 57 mins Evil Awakens: Fascist Symbols And Rhetoric On Rise In Italian EU Vote
  • 3 hours Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 2 hours Level-Headed Analysis of the Future of U.S. Shale Oil Industry
  • 9 mins Apartheid Is Still There: Post-apartheid South Africa Is World’s Most Unequal Country
  • 6 hours Asia Oil Refiners Mull Run Cuts With Margins At 16 yrs. Low For Season
  • 10 hours Devastating Sanctions: Iran and Venezuela hurting
  • 5 hours IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 4 hours Misunderstanding between USA and Iran the cause of current stand off, I call BS
  • 21 mins Prosecutors Fine Bosch 90 Million Euros For Emissions Cheating Role
  • 4 hours Trump bogged down in Mideast quagmire. US spent $Trillions, lost Thousands of lives, and lost goodwill. FOR WHAT? US interests ? WHAT INTEREST ? . . . . China greatest threat next 50 years.
  • 4 hours Why is Strait of Hormuz the World's Most Important Oil Artery
  • 4 hours ARAMCO BOARD: Former Dow Chemical CEO Andrew Liveris: I want to help Saudi Arabia become a 21st century economy
John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

Trending Discussions

South Korean Nuclear Plants Riddled with Substandard Parts

The Japanese nuclear disaster of 11 March 2011 occurred when an offshore earthquake, which measured 9.0 on the Richter scale, was followed by a tsunami that effectively destroyed Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s six reactor Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (NPP).

Since then, the global community using NPPs has been arguing about the significance of the event, whether the havoc wrought on Fukushima was a harbinger of things to come or rather, an isolated, freak incident. As nations have over the last 40 years invested trillions of dollars in nuclear energy, the stakes are high, with proponents arguing that Fukushima was a freak accident, while anti-nuclear proponents argue that the disaster that destroyed Fukushima was indeed a freak of nature that no one could have foreseen.

Advocates of nuclear power rightly insist that NPPs generate nearly zero gas emissions, an object of no minor concern to a world increasingly preoccupied with the issues of greenhouse gas emissions and global warming.

Opponents argue with equal vehemence that NPPs are nevertheless vulnerable to a number of potentially catastrophic events beyond damage inflicted by Mother Nature, in the form of human error, which caused the 1979 partial meltdown at the U.S. NPP at Three Mile Island, which the U.S. Nuclear Commission labeled, “the most serious in U.S. commercial nuclear power plant operating history, even though it led to no deaths or injuries to plant workers or members of the nearby community.”

Five years later, the USSR’s Ukrainian Chernobyl NPP exploded, resulting in one of only two classified as a level 7 event on the International Nuclear Event Scale, the other being the 11 March 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear incident.

Why is this history relevant?

Because South Koreans are learning that their government, in a pro-nuclear country bereft of fossil fuel energy imports, is investigating forged safety documents for parts used in NPPs and design flaws in the country’s reactors, both examples of human error, which can put the country’s NPPs at increased risk from equipment failure.

How serious are things in the Land of the Morning Calm?

Related Article: Iran's Nuclear Plant Entering Final Stages?

On 9 November, after microscopic cracks were found in six tunnels that guide control rods to regulate the fission chain reaction in the reactor’s core were discovered in a 1,000 megawatt reactor at the Yonggwang NPP, two of the country’s 23 NPPS were shut down. This was the first time since South Korea started operating NPPs that cracks had been discovered on key components and not basic components, and experts warned that if the NPP had continued to run with the cracks, it could have led to an explosion of the reactor in a worst case scenario.

Worse was to follow.

Last month South Korea’s Ministry of Knowledge Economy announced in the aftermath of the Yonggwang NPP shutdown that a survey had determined that South Korea’s 23 NPPs contained 230 substandard components, after determining that the supply of substandard parts to Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., the state-run operator of the nation’s NPPS, had been going on since 2003.

There is a lot at stake for South Korea, as Seoul intends to build another six NPPs by 2024 so as to lessen its dependence on imported oil, coal and liquefied natural gas. Additionally, South Korea intends to export 80 NPPs by 2030 in contracts worth up to $300 billion.
South Korea’s 23 reactors supply roughly 35 percent of its electricity needs, roughly on a level with Japan’s nuclear industry before Fukushima. To bring them all offline would impose significant hardship on both the country’s export driven industries and the populace.

But the issues of substandard parts and NPP flaws is not one that the South Korean government can avoid, especially given both its population’s concerns in the aftermath of the nuclear catastrophe in neighboring Japan and its desire to export nuclear technology.

Painful as it might be, the sooner the South Korean government fully and transparently addresses the issues concerning its nuclear power industry, the better.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News