• 13 hours Iraq Begins To Rebuild Largest Refinery
  • 17 hours Canadian Producers Struggle To Find Transport Oil Cargo
  • 19 hours Venezuela’s PDVSA Makes $539M Interest Payments On Bonds
  • 20 hours China's CNPC Considers Taking Over South Pars Gas Field
  • 22 hours BP To Invest $200 Million In Solar
  • 23 hours Tesla Opens New Showroom In NYC
  • 24 hours Petrobras CEO Hints At New Partner In Oil-Rich Campos Basin
  • 1 day Venezuela Sells Oil Refinery Stake To Cuba
  • 1 day Tesla Is “Headed For A Brick Wall”
  • 2 days Norwegian Pension Fund Set to Divest From Oil Sands and Coal Ventures
  • 2 days IEA: “2018 Might Not Be Quite So Happy For OPEC Producers”
  • 2 days Goldman Bullish On Oil Markets
  • 2 days OPEC Member Nigeria To Issue Africa’s First Sovereign Green Bond
  • 2 days Nigeria To Spend $1B Of Oil Money Fighting Boko Haram
  • 2 days Syria Aims To Begin Offshore Gas Exploration In 2019
  • 2 days Australian Watchdog Blocks BP Fuel Station Acquisition
  • 2 days Colombia Boosts Oil & Gas Investment
  • 3 days Environmentalists Rev Up Anti-Keystone XL Angst Amongst Landowners
  • 3 days Venezuelan Default Swap Bonds At 19.25 Cents On The Dollar
  • 3 days Aramco On The Hunt For IPO Global Coordinators
  • 3 days ADNOC Distribution Jumps 16% At Market Debut In UAE
  • 3 days India Feels the Pinch As Oil Prices Rise
  • 3 days Aramco Announces $40 Billion Investment Program
  • 3 days Top Insurer Axa To Exit Oil Sands
  • 4 days API Reports Huge Crude Draw
  • 4 days Venezuela “Can’t Even Write A Check For $21.5M Dollars.”
  • 4 days EIA Lowers 2018 Oil Demand Growth Estimates By 40,000 Bpd
  • 4 days Trump Set To Open Atlantic Coast To Oil, Gas Drilling
  • 4 days Norway’s Oil And Gas Investment To Drop For Fourth Consecutive Year
  • 4 days Saudis Plan To Hike Gasoline Prices By 80% In January
  • 4 days Exxon To Start Reporting On Climate Change Effect
  • 5 days US Geological Survey To Reevaluate Bakken Oil Reserves
  • 5 days Brazil Cuts Local Content Requirements to Attract Oil Investors
  • 5 days Forties Pipeline Could Remain Shuttered For Weeks
  • 5 days Desjardins Ends Energy Loan Moratorium
  • 5 days ADNOC Distribution IPO Valuation Could Be Lesson For Aramco
  • 5 days Russia May Turn To Cryptocurrencies For Oil Trade
  • 5 days Iraq-Iran Oil Swap Deal To Run For 1 Year
  • 8 days Venezuelan Crude Exports To U.S. Fall To 15-year Lows
  • 8 days Mexico Blames Brazil For Failing Auction

Breaking News:

Iraq Begins To Rebuild Largest Refinery

Alt Text

Is This The End Of Nuclear Power In The UK?

The UK has been planning…

Alt Text

The Boy Genius Tackling Energy’s Toughest Problem

This 23-year old nuclear physicist…

Proposed Indian Nuclear Power Plant in Zone Subject to Earthquakes

Proposed Indian Nuclear Power Plant in Zone Subject to Earthquakes

Like many energy poor countries with rapidly rising economies, India’s government sees the development of a nuclear power industry as a potential godsend to meeting soaring demands for electricity.

But the country’s proposed nuclear program has run into increasing resistance, following the devastating earthquake and subsequent tsunami that on 11 March 2011 devastated Japan’s Daichi nuclear power plant complex, taking all six Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) reactors offline. Public opinion in India is concerned because the country is subject to both of the natural phenomena, and authorities are declining to release relevant materials.

The issue is not insignificant, as nuclear power is now the fourth-largest source of electricity in India, exceeded only by thermal, hydro and wind power, with its 19 online nuclear power plants (NPPs) generating 4,560 megawatts of electricity.

In the most recent example of governmental stonewalling, New Delhi is declining to release to the public a geological study of the Jaitapur region in Maharashtra State on the Arabian Sea, where the government intends to construct a NPP.

India’s government has already seen significant public protests over the $2.5 billion Kudankulam NPP in Tamil Nadu state, containing six 1,200 megawatt and two 1,000 megawatt reactors and now nearly complete. On 11 January Nuclear Power Corporation Of India Limited (NPCIL) Technical Director S. A. Bhardwaj told the media, " The Kudankulam NPP was built to our specifications, our regulatory requirements…  To my mind as a nuclear technologist, this is the safest nuclear power plant in the world. India is getting into the deep power crises because of the unavailability of coal, oil and natural gas, and as you know everyday prices are going up. So nuclear is the answer. Yes, we will have as much solar power and wind power as possible but that does not satisfy our needs, therefore this (nuclear power) is demanded by India."

But, as the opposition continues to grow, former Indian President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam has urged Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to resolve the Kudankulam dispute by taking up the issue with Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa.

But back to the proposed Jaitapur NPP.

Professor of Geological Sciences and Fellow in the University of Colorado at Boulder’s Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Energy and Minerals Applied Research Center Roger Bilham and Dr. Vinod Gaur of the Indian Institute of Astrophysics have coauthored a paper asserting that an earthquake of magnitude 6.0 on the Richter scale can occur in the Jaitapur region.

Bilham observed that Koyna and Latur had suffered earthquakes within the last 50 years. the Koyna rubble-concrete dam, one of the largest in Maharashtra, India.

On 11 December 1967 a 6.5 magnitude earthquake hit Koynanagar near the site of the Koyna dam, killing at least 180 people and injuring over 1,500 people, opening up some fissures on the dam. The region has also suffered several earthquakes of smaller magnitude since then. In March 1996 an earthquake struck Latur District, which also contains a number of hydroelectric facilities.

Bilham said, "Jaitapur lies in the same compressional stress region that caused the Koyna and Latur quakes in the past five decades, it can be argued that a similar sized earthquake could possibly occur directly beneath the power plant. The probability of such a quake is low, but it must be an important consideration while designing the nuclear power plant. India is smashing into Asia, and thus earthquakes will always be a possibility."

While Bilham stated he was not necessarily against a NPP in Jaitapur, he advocates a stronger structural design because an earthquake in the region simply could not be ruled out before noting India's western coast has large sedimentary deposits and so a small earthquake could also trigger massive tsunamis.

Accordingly, New Delhi’s reluctance to release its geological study of the Jaitapur region seems to have a solid basis in scientific fact.

And authorities are bracing themselves for protests, as the people of Jaitapur nuclear project-affected villages have declared that they would undertake a massive “jail bharo” protest on 24-26 January.

In the battle for local hearts and minds the Indian government has yet to make its case, and the withholding of the Jaitapur study can only help fan belief that the authorities in fact have something to hide.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • sudhinder thakur on January 17 2012 said:
    Wind power generation in the country during April 2008 to Oct 2011 ( three years and seven months) has been 64 billion units as compared to more than 32 BUs in the year 2011(only 12 months). The nuclear power generation is third largest source and not fourth in terms of generation. But this is a minor point.
    regarding the siesmicity at Jaitapur, the report also says that ground acceleration at Jaitapur is within capability of most nuclear power plants. This is missed. The important point is that the nuclear power plant can be designed and will be designed for the peak ground acceleration and other factors at the site.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News