• 4 minutes US-backed coup in Venezuela not so smooth
  • 7 minutes Why Trump will win the wall fight
  • 11 minutes Oil imports by countries
  • 13 minutes Maduro Asks OPEC For Help Against U.S. Sanctions
  • 4 hours Climate Change: A Summer of Storms and Smog Is Coming
  • 4 hours The Quick Read On MBS's Tour of Pakistan, India And China
  • 3 hours Tension On The Edge: Pakistan Urges U.N. To Intervene Over Kashmir Tension With India
  • 2 hours Teens For Climate: Swedish Student Leader Wins EU Pledge To Spend Billions On Climate
  • 4 hours Iran Starts Gulf War Games, To Test Submarine-Launched Missiles
  • 3 hours BMW to add 2,000 more jobs at Dingolfing plant
  • 5 hours Venezuela: Nicolas Maduro closes border with Brazil
  • 20 hours Itt looks like natural gas may be at its lowest price ever.
  • 6 hours Saudi A to Splash $100 Bln on India
  • 23 hours Amazon’s Exit Could Scare Off Tech Companies From New York
  • 1 hour Indian Oil Signs First Annual Deal For U.S. OilIndian Oil Signs First Annual Deal For U.S. Oil
  • 14 hours NEW FERUKA REFINERY
  • 7 hours Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
Alt Text

Is Ocasio-Cortez Right To Dismiss Nuclear Energy?

The Democratic party unveiled its…

Alt Text

U.S. Nuclear Has A Tough Road Ahead

High-profile disasters and a booming…

Alt Text

Turkey’s Big Nuclear Energy Ambitions

Despite operational challenges, delays and…

Al Fin

Al Fin

Al Fin runs a number of very successful blogs that cover, energy, technology, news and politics.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Nuclear Power: Safer, Cheaper, More Reliable and No CO2

One of the features of nuclear power which is most attractive to a large segment of the population, is the fact that it does not emit CO2. Among all baseload energy sources, nuclear is the cheapest and lowest carbon emitting power source. With the coming of factory-made small modular nuclear plants, nuclear should get cheaper, more reliable, safer to operate, and quicker to install.

Emissions

After analysing a wealth of peer-reviewed studies on market needs, technology
performance, life-cycle emissions and electricity costs, the researchers conclude that only five technologies currently qualify for low-emission baseload generation. Of these, nuclear power is the standout solution. Nuclear is the cheapest option at all carbon prices and the only one able to meet the stringent greenhouse gas emission targets envisaged for 2050.

Only one of these five qualifiers comes from the renewable energy category – solar thermal in combination with heat storage and gas backup. However, on a cost basis, it is uncompetitive, as are the carbon capture and storage technologies.

Professor Barry Brook, director of climate science at the University of Adelaide’s Environment Institute says: “I am committed to the environment, personally and professionally. The evidence is compelling that nuclear energy must play a central role in future electricity generation. No other technology can meet our demand for power while reducing carbon emissions to meet global targets”. _BraveNewClimate_via_NextBigFuture

More informed energy analysts understand that the true strengths of nuclear power far transcend the feature of no carbon emissions. But if low CO2 emissions can be used as a bargaining point with the carbon hysterics in government regulatory agencies, then by all means, let's do it.

CO2 is a well-mixed atmospheric gas. Plants and algae do not care where their CO2 comes from (China and India), and will not begrudge humans their more sustainable nuclear power -- even if it means less CO2 for them.

By. Al Fin




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on December 03 2010 said:
    In my new energy economics textbook I wrote somewhere "When I hear people talking about reducing greenhouse gases with nuclear, I tune out." I tune out because although I am absolutely and totally and completely interested in more nuclear, nuclear by itself will not make it. What is needed is nuclear and a load of renewables - a lot of renewables. That is the arrangement to plug.
  • bristolchick on January 27 2012 said:
    @Anonymous
    "What is needed is nuclear and a load of renewables - a lot of renewables. That is the arrangement to plug."
    You will find, if you visit Professor Barry Brook's blog bravenewclimate.com that is exactly his position.
    He thinks that we need renewables plus nuclear power to solve the climate crisis. Indeed he is not pro-nuclear per se and clearly states that all energy options should be on the table for examination. Whichever produces the lowest CO2 for the lowest cost should be used to replace the fossil fuels coal and gas.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News