• 2 days Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 2 days Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 3 days Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 3 days $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 3 days Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 3 days Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 3 days Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 3 days Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 3 days Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 3 days Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 4 days Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 4 days Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 4 days Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 4 days Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 4 days U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 4 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 5 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
  • 5 days Russian Hackers Target British Energy Industry
  • 5 days Venezuela Signs $3.15B Debt Restructuring Deal With Russia
  • 5 days DOJ: Protestors Interfering With Pipeline Construction Will Be Prosecuted
  • 5 days Lower Oil Prices Benefit European Refiners
  • 5 days World’s Biggest Private Equity Firm Raises $1 Billion To Invest In Oil
  • 6 days Oil Prices Tank After API Reports Strong Build In Crude Inventories
  • 6 days Iraq Oil Revenue Not Enough For Sustainable Development
  • 6 days Sudan In Talks With Foreign Oil Firms To Boost Crude Production
  • 6 days Shell: Four Oil Platforms Shut In Gulf Of Mexico After Fire
  • 6 days OPEC To Recruit New Members To Fight Market Imbalance
  • 6 days Green Groups Want Norway’s Arctic Oil Drilling Licenses Canceled
  • 6 days Venezuelan Oil Output Drops To Lowest In 28 Years
  • 6 days Shale Production Rises By 80,000 BPD In Latest EIA Forecasts
  • 6 days GE Considers Selling Baker Hughes Assets
  • 7 days Eni To Address Barents Sea Regulatory Breaches By Dec 11
  • 7 days Saudi Aramco To Invest $300 Billion In Upstream Projects
  • 7 days Aramco To List Shares In Hong Kong ‘For Sure’
  • 7 days BP CEO Sees Venezuela As Oil’s Wildcard
  • 7 days Iran Denies Involvement In Bahrain Oil Pipeline Blast
  • 9 days The Oil Rig Drilling 10 Miles Under The Sea
  • 9 days Baghdad Agrees To Ship Kirkuk Oil To Iran
  • 10 days Another Group Joins Niger Delta Avengers’ Ceasefire Boycott
  • 10 days Italy Looks To Phase Out Coal-Fired Electricity By 2025
Alt Text

New Tech Is Transforming Japan’s Energy Sector

The tech that built bitcoin…

Alt Text

Russia’s Nuclear Sector Is Surging

With a long-standing nuclear tradition,…

Alt Text

This OPEC Strategy Could Boost Uranium Prices Next Year

Kazakhstan, the world’s largest uranium…

John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

Mother Nature Mugs California's Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant

Mother Nature Mugs California's Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant

On 11 March 2011 TEPCO’s Fukushima nuclear power plant was rattled by an offshore 9.0 on the Richter scale earthquake. The tremor subsequently generated a tsunami that effectively destroyed the complex, sending shock waves worldwide through the nuclear power industry, hoping that 24 years after Chernobyl, public amnesia and governmental commitments to curbing greenhouse gas emissions, nuclear power was moving back into the mainstream.

Instead of a nuclear renaissance, Fukushima refocused a most unwelcome spotlight on existing nuclear power plants (NPPS) and their safety procedures.

And in the U.S., of the nation’s 104 commercials, the NPP most assiduously avoiding the spotlight is Pacific Gas & Electric’s Diablo Canyon’s NPP, 12 miles southwest of San Luis Obispo, where twin Westinghouse designed four-Loop pressurized 1,100 megawatt water reactors (PWRs) annually produce about 18,000 gigawatt hours for more than three million people.

But Diablo Canyon NPP has been controversial from its inception, with many environmentalists objecting to the fact that the NPP was constructed directly over known seismic fault lines.

Nevertheless, two weeks after the Fukushima catastrophe, PG&E applied to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to renew their two current operating licenses for 20 more years, which would extend operations from 2024 and 2025 to 2044 and 2045.

The request has not gone without political commentary. California State Senator Sam Blakeslee (R, San Luis Obispo, 15th District), a geophysicist with a Ph.D. in earthquake studies and a member of the California State Senate Select Committee on Earthquake and Disaster Preparedness during the license renewal hearings by his committee repeatedly asked PG&E to withdraw its license renewal application and perform a new seismic study of the facilities site.

Blakeslee’s concerns were hardly unfounded. While the Diablo Canyon NPP was designed to withstand a 7.5-magnitude earthquake on the Richter scale, it exists in a seismically active neighborhood, 20 miles away from the Rinconada Fault and 45 miles from the better known San Andreas Fault.

And oh, in 1971, the offshore Hosgri Fault, two and a half miles away from Diablo site, was discovered by Shell Oil Co., whose officials informed PG&E while the Diablo Canyon NPP was under construction.

More recently, a forth nearby fault line was discovered. Blakeslee accordingly insisted that the known presence of the Hosgri earthquake fault, two and a half miles away, and the newly detected Shoreline Fault, runs within less than a mile of the plant, should be thoroughly charted and studied before PG&E applies for a license renewal.

Now it would seem that Mother Nature is sending yet another signal. Each Westinghouse Diablo Canyon reactor uses a thermal design flow (TDF) using 87,700 gallons of seawater per minute.

Well, that warm water returned to the Pacific from the reactors is apparently attracting “friends.” Salps, small barrel-shaped “tunicates” plankton similar to jellyfish, can grow to nearly four inches long, have flocked to the seawater intake at the Diablo Canyon NPP, forcing operators to reduce power at its Unit 2 reactor to about 25 percent.

The good news?

Diablo Canyon reactor number one was shut down earlier for scheduled refueling before the infestation, a procedure that usually takes about a month.

The bad news?

Salps can blanket many square miles of ocean in huge, gelatinous masses and no one at Diablo Canyon NPP knows how many are at the Avila Beach plant or how long they will remain. PG&E spokesman Tom Cuddy first said, “We then made the conservative decision to ramp down the affected unit to 20 percent and continued to monitor the situation. When the problem continued, we made another conservative decision that it would be safest to curtail the power of the unit.” Cuddy then optimistically told reporters, "We'll continue to monitor the intake structure and clean the salp off the (intake) screens. Once they decide to move on and it's safe to do so, we'll resume full power."

The salp infestation is hardly limited to Diablo Canyon, as in recent years the critters have been a problem at nuclear plants in the U.S., Japan, Israel and Scotland.

As sci-fi as the image of hordes of environmentally sensitive salps heroically sacrificing themselves for the greater good on the water intake screens of Diablo Canyon NPP is, joking aside, the water intake issue raises nasty echoes of Fukushima, where the tsunami knocked out power to the generators pumping coolant water to both the reactors and spent fuel rod storage ponds. At the end of the day, it is irrelevant as to what interferes with the water flow – no water, temperatures rise.

What both Fukushima and Diablo Canyon share in common is the fact that natural elements unanticipated when the NPP was built can remind engineers that it not possible to plan for and factor out every contingency.

As Diablo Canyon reactor number one came online in 1985, perhaps, 27 years later, given the facility’s proximity to not one but four faultiness, it’s time for PG&E stockholders to cash out their investment and shutter the plant, as the future cost of indemnifying California for a nuclear “incident” would most certainly affect their profits.

Mother Nature has spoken, in any case are PG&E management listening? On 28 April a magnitude 3.8 earthquake struck southern California at 8:07 a.m. Sign of things to come?

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • robert on May 01 2012 said:
    Great article. I couldn't agree with you more.
  • Mel Tisdale on May 02 2012 said:
    America could lead the world in Thorium powered nuclear power plants if it could only do away with the silly notion that 'bigger is better'. Thorium reactors are inherently safe, do not need copious amounts of water, so can be sited almost anywhere and sized to suit local communities, thus doing away with the need for vast power grids.

    America could even develop a significant export industry seeing as they cannot be used to make nuclear weapons. Imagine offering to help Iran develop Thorium reactors. It would call their bluff regarding the supposed need to develop nuclear power and the world might thus be a safer place if the offer was accepted.
  • Torgen on May 02 2012 said:
    A nuclear disaster at Diablo Canyon could, as we learned from Fukushima, easily create a contaminated exclusion zone of thousands of square kilometers (including the city of San Luis Obisbo)that would have to be abandoned. That means all land and land improvements become worthless in a matter of hours leaving both private and public property owners with no way to insure against radioactive contamination thanks to the Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act. PG&E stockholders as well as property owners within 50 miles of Diablo Canyon should take note of the rapid wealth destruction occurring in Fukushima as a result of the nuclear disaster there. The financial risk is immensely foolish for a power plant that provides only 8 percent of California's energy.
  • martha andrade on May 02 2012 said:
    Excellent and enlightening! The salps have now moved on, and the plant is back online, but the message is out: IT'S NOT NICE TO MESS WITH MOTHER NATURE, AND SHE WILL HAVE THE LAST SAY. Thank you for this piece,John, and please keep them coming!

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News