• 5 minutes Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
  • 8 minutes IT IS FINISHED. OPEC Victorious
  • 14 minutes Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 17 minutes Could Tesla Buy GM?
  • 3 hours OPEC Cuts Deep to Save Cartel
  • 2 hours Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 4 hours Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 16 hours Price Decline in Chinese Solar Panels
  • 6 hours U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 8 hours How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 4 hours And the War on LNG is Now On
  • 2 hours What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 13 hours USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 2 hours Air-to-Fuels Energy and Cost Calculation
  • 21 hours Alberta Cuts Push Prices Too High
  • 17 hours Rigs Down
Alt Text

Uzbekistan, Russia Announce Joint Nuclear Facility

Uzbekistan and Russia have struck…

Alt Text

Can France Move Away From Nuclear Energy?

France’s nuclear romance which, started…

Alt Text

Why Nuclear Energy Is Critical For Russia

Russia is renowned for its…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Despite Setbacks South Korea Commits to Nuclear Power

South Korea gave a green light on January 29 to a $7 billion plan to build two new nuclear reactors, a sign that Korea will push forward with nuclear power despite its recent troubles with the technology. South Korea has 23 nuclear reactors in the country, but shut down its fourth reactor on Jan. 28 due to “technical” problems, raising the prospect of energy shortages this winter.

The move comes amid ongoing uncertainty over the role that nuclear power will play in the future of Korea’s energy mix, where it has traditionally been a centerpiece. Nuclear power makes up about one-third of Korea’s electricity generation, but the Fukushima crisis in Japan cast a long shadow over the industry in recent years, putting pressure on the government to back away from what became to be seen as a dangerous source of energy. Adding to the troubles, Korea’s nuclear industry has been engulfed in its own scandal in which equipment for nuclear reactors received fake safety certificates. Korea indicted 100 officials in the nuclear industry for the fraud, and the scandal threatened to do lasting damage to nuclear power throughout the country.

The approval of two new reactors gives renewed momentum for nuclear power while Korea zigzags on its nuclear energy policy. The previous government planned to make nuclear energy an increasingly important source of energy, growing its share of electricity generation to 41% by 2030, up from today’s share of one-third. However, earlier this month, the current government announced a reversal, scaling-back nuclear’s share to only 29% by 2035 – no doubt motivated by Fukushima and the fraudulent safety certificate scandal.

Related article: US Sailors Sue for Illnesses they Believe Caused by Fukushima

Building two new reactors shows that the Korean government wants to chart a middle path, moving forward with new reactors and relying on nuclear power for years to come, but not overly so. The government recognizes how much the economy relies on its reactors, and like Japan, lacks abundant indigenous energy resources and would suffer blackouts if it backed away too sharply.

Moreover, Korea hopes to support a thriving nuclear export industry. The Korea Electric Power Corp (Kepco) won a contract in 2009 to supply the United Arab Emirates with nuclear reactor technologies, stunning more renowned nuclear companies in the United States that have long dominated international nuclear exports. Korea wants to remain a big player for nuclear exports.

To add to the complexity, on January 28 South Korea affirmed its commitment to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 30% by 2020 below a business-as-usual baseline. The plan outlines emissions reduction targets sector-by-sector, including a 26.7% cut in emissions from power generation. South Korea plans to kick off a new emissions trading scheme (ETS) in 2015, which will give a boost to nuclear power. Put another way, as source of low-carbon energy, Korea will need to rely more heavily on nuclear power as it seeks to displace dirtier sources of energy and meet its climate goals.

If, on the other hand, Korea sought to shut down its nuclear power sector in much of the way that Japan has, it would be forced to import more coal, LNG, and oil to fuel its economy.

Korea may have lowered its target for nuclear power earlier this month, but it also firmed up its commitment over the long-run.

By. Nick Cunningham




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News