• 25 mins U.S. Tax Bill Keeps EV Incentives
  • 2 hours Rivals Close In On Tesla After A Near-Miss With The SEC
  • 3 hours This Country Produces 39% Of The World’s Uranium
  • 4 hours Australia Can Achieve A Zero-Carbon Gas Grid By 2050
  • 6 hours Is A Russia-Cuba Energy Deal In The Works?
  • 3 days Iraq Begins To Rebuild Largest Refinery
  • 3 days Canadian Producers Struggle To Find Transport Oil Cargo
  • 3 days Venezuela’s PDVSA Makes $539M Interest Payments On Bonds
  • 3 days China's CNPC Considers Taking Over South Pars Gas Field
  • 3 days BP To Invest $200 Million In Solar
  • 3 days Tesla Opens New Showroom In NYC
  • 3 days Petrobras CEO Hints At New Partner In Oil-Rich Campos Basin
  • 3 days Venezuela Sells Oil Refinery Stake To Cuba
  • 4 days Tesla Is “Headed For A Brick Wall”
  • 4 days Norwegian Pension Fund Set to Divest From Oil Sands and Coal Ventures
  • 4 days IEA: “2018 Might Not Be Quite So Happy For OPEC Producers”
  • 4 days Goldman Bullish On Oil Markets
  • 4 days OPEC Member Nigeria To Issue Africa’s First Sovereign Green Bond
  • 4 days Nigeria To Spend $1B Of Oil Money Fighting Boko Haram
  • 4 days Syria Aims To Begin Offshore Gas Exploration In 2019
  • 4 days Australian Watchdog Blocks BP Fuel Station Acquisition
  • 5 days Colombia Boosts Oil & Gas Investment
  • 5 days Environmentalists Rev Up Anti-Keystone XL Angst Amongst Landowners
  • 5 days Venezuelan Default Swap Bonds At 19.25 Cents On The Dollar
  • 5 days Aramco On The Hunt For IPO Global Coordinators
  • 5 days ADNOC Distribution Jumps 16% At Market Debut In UAE
  • 5 days India Feels the Pinch As Oil Prices Rise
  • 5 days Aramco Announces $40 Billion Investment Program
  • 5 days Top Insurer Axa To Exit Oil Sands
  • 6 days API Reports Huge Crude Draw
  • 6 days Venezuela “Can’t Even Write A Check For $21.5M Dollars.”
  • 6 days EIA Lowers 2018 Oil Demand Growth Estimates By 40,000 Bpd
  • 6 days Trump Set To Open Atlantic Coast To Oil, Gas Drilling
  • 6 days Norway’s Oil And Gas Investment To Drop For Fourth Consecutive Year
  • 6 days Saudis Plan To Hike Gasoline Prices By 80% In January
  • 6 days Exxon To Start Reporting On Climate Change Effect
  • 7 days US Geological Survey To Reevaluate Bakken Oil Reserves
  • 7 days Brazil Cuts Local Content Requirements to Attract Oil Investors
  • 7 days Forties Pipeline Could Remain Shuttered For Weeks
  • 7 days Desjardins Ends Energy Loan Moratorium

Breaking News:

U.S. Tax Bill Keeps EV Incentives

Alt Text

Is This The End Of Nuclear Power In The UK?

The UK has been planning…

Alt Text

Nuclear Power's Resurgence In The Middle East

While nuclear power loses popularity…

James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

Budget Cuts Force U.S. out of the Nuclear Fusion Race

Budget Cuts Force U.S. out of the Nuclear Fusion Race

Nuclear fission is the process by which atoms are split apart to release energy, the process which powers modern nuclear reactors. But fission also has a more powerful, more efficient, cleaner cousin; nuclear fusion. In nuclear fusion atoms are fused together to release even greater amounts of energy.

After the nuclear fission bombs of the Second World War scientists started to experiment with much more powerful fusion bombs. However it wasn’t until 1951 that fusion was considered for peaceful endeavours. A Princeton University scientist by the name of Lyman Spitzer Jr. founded a laboratory where he designed a new machine which could harness the vast energy levels released in fusion reactions. Sptizer called his invention the stellerator, and dreamed that it could one day power tens of thousands of homes.

For the full report please visit the Washington Post




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Bill on June 29 2012 said:
    One thing to keep in mind is that the Princeton facility is not the only one in the country to study fusion. The stellerator concept competes with tokomaks of which there are many operating in the US (MIT, GA-San Diego and one at Princeton as well). The US is also participating in the ITER tokomak project in France. But most importantly the National Ignition Facility (NIF)at Livermore which is studying inertial confinement fusion enjoys extensive funding (by virtue of its nuclear weapons maintenance application). By many reports the NIF is much closer to demonstrating self-sustaining fusion in the near term than tokomak or stellerator technology. So yes, maybe funding is reduced for Princeton's stellerator, but US fusion research is arguably well-supported through the ITER and NIF programs. In my opinion the title of your article is quite misleading and does not accurately reflect the support for fusion research in the US.
  • Bob white on June 30 2012 said:
    Let's face it, the US is well on its way to be on par with Bangladesh in 25 years.

    Better get your kids registered in Mandarin courses...
  • SteveK9 on July 01 2012 said:
    It's no loss. I was very excited about fusion when I first read about it ... in 1968. It was 20 years away ... it is always 20 years away. A friend of mine got out of Plasma Physics in 1982, because he said it was going nowhere ... he got that right.

    Fission can do everything we need. It is also unlimited, cheap and safe.
  • Mangle on July 07 2012 said:
    Y'all should read this:

    http://www.mydigitalpublication.com//display_article.php?id=1104768

    It's from the Journal of Petroleum Technology.

    "In the late 1850s, the whaling industry was in a veritable boom in the town of Lahaina on the Hawaiian island of Maui. Business was great, and many in the whaling industry believed that increased demand would continue for decades to come. But in 1859, oil was discovered in Titusville, Pennsylvania with a well drilled by Edwin Drake. The rest is history.

    That was 150 years ago. A small but increasing number of people around the world believe we are on a similar course, except this time it is the petroleum industry that might be threatened. As with any emerging technology, critical challenges must be overcome and a significant effort lies ahead to convince a world of skeptics that a new source of energy has been discovered and will be important.

    The potential new source of energy is low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR). With any discussion of a new technology, caution is advised. The world of LENR is filled with mystery, contradiction, gross speculation, misinformation, slippery timelines, and skepticism that sometimes spill over into outright denial. Healthy skepticism on LENR (or any new technology) is a good thing, but so is an open mind. If LENR is for real—and many well-qualified physicists believe it is—it will not only change the petroleum industry, but also significantly affect almost every aspect of our world. Some call it ,the new fire.'"

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News