A group of researchers led by Shriram Ramanathan at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences are increasingly optimistic about the commercial viability of making fuel cells practical and affordable. From advances in nanostructured devices, lower operating temperatures, and the use of an abundant fuel source and cheaper materials commercial viability of the technology will not happen overnight, however the group believes it may not take much longer.
Ramanathan, an expert and innovator in the development of solid-oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), says they may, in fact, soon become the go-to technology for those on the go. Ramanathan’s confidence comes from two studies appearing in the Journal of Power Sources this month, Ramanathan’s team reported several critical advances in SOFC technology that may quicken their pace to market.
In the first paper, Ramanathan’s group demonstrated stable and functional all-ceramic thin-film SOFCs that do not contain any platinum. There’s the “Eureka!” moment.
Ramanathan explains that in thin-film SOFCs, the electrolyte is reduced to a hundredth or even a thousandth of its usual scale, using densely packed layers of special ceramic films, each just nanometers in thickness. These micro-SOFCs usually incorporate platinum electrodes, but they can be expensive and unreliable. “If you use porous metal electrodes they tend to be inherently unstable over long periods of time. They start to agglomerate and create open circuits in the fuel cells,’ said Ramanathan. Ramanathan’s platinum-free micro-SOFC eliminates this problem, resulting in a win-win: lower cost and higher reliability.
In a second paper published this month, the team demonstrated a methane-fueled micro-SOFC operating at less than 500° Celsius, a feat that is relatively rare in the field. Lightning Strike!
Here the explanation is traditional SOFCs have been operating at about 800-1000°C, but such high temperatures are only practical for stationary power generation. In short, using them to power up for example, a smartphone mid-commute is not feasible. In recent years, materials scientists have been working to reduce the required operating temperature to about 300-500°C, a range Ramanathan calls the “sweet spot.”
Moreover, when fuel cells operate at lower temperatures, material reliability is less critical – allowing, for example, the use of less expensive ceramics and metallic interconnects – and the start-up (heat up) time can be shorter. “Low temperature is a holy grail in this field,” says Ramanathan. “If you can realize high-performance solid-oxide fuel cells that operate in the 300-500°C range, you can use them in transportation vehicles and portable electronics, and with different types of fuels.”
Of major importance is the use of methane, from abundant and cheap natural gas, in the team’s SOFC is also of note. Until recently, hydrogen has been the primary fuel for SOFCs. Pure hydrogen, however, requires a greater amount of processing. “It’s expensive to make pure hydrogen,” says Ramanathan, “and that severely limits the range of applications.”
As methane begins to take over as the fuel of choice, the advances in temperature, reliability, and affordability should continue to reinforce each other.
Electrochemical fuel cells have long been viewed as a potential eco-friendly alternative to fossil fuels – especially as most SOFCs leave behind little more than water as waste – while the obstacles to using SOFCs to charge laptops and phones or drive the next generation of cars and trucks have remained reliability, temperature, and cost.
Fuel cells operate by converting chemical energy (from hydrogen or a hydrocarbon fuel such as methane) into an electric current. Oxygen ions travel from the cathode through the electrolyte toward the anode, where they oxidize the fuel to produce a current of electrons back toward the cathode. That may seem simple enough in principle, but until now, SOFCs have been more suited for the laboratory rather than the office or garage.
For the U.S., academic research using methane is a huge relief, because getting away from the capital investment, processing and chemistry to obtain hydrogen and then store it and handle it by ordinary people – is an economic killer. Using a compressible gas like methane is a major improvement in realistic thinking about the real world.
But remember, the Japanese already have a small liquid fueled fuel cell on the market now using methanol. For all the excitement in Boston, the race is very much still on. The Harvard group does have an advantage – methane is cheap and easy to make, plus it’s piped to urban homes nation wide.
Lets hope the Harvard team makes more progress. With fuel cell efficiency and a low cost fuel source that’s widely disbursed high efficiency small-scale power generation could get going along with fuel cell vehicle charging. It’s great news, indeed.
By. Brian Westenhaus