• 4 hours EIA Weekly Inventory Data Due Wednesday, Despite Govt. Shutdown
  • 8 hours Oklahoma Rig Explodes, Leaving Five Missing
  • 10 hours Lloyd’s Sees No Room For Coal In New Investment Strategy
  • 13 hours Gunmen Kidnap Nigerian Oil Workers In Oil-Rich Delta Area
  • 15 hours Libya’s NOC Restarts Oil Fields
  • 16 hours US Orion To Develop Gas Field In Iraq
  • 3 days U.S. On Track To Unseat Saudi Arabia As No.2 Oil Producer In the World
  • 3 days Senior Interior Dept. Official Says Florida Still On Trump’s Draft Drilling Plan
  • 3 days Schlumberger Optimistic In 2018 For Oilfield Services Businesses
  • 3 days Only 1/3 Of Oil Patch Jobs To Return To Canada After Downturn Ends
  • 4 days Statoil, YPF Finalize Joint Vaca Muerta Development Deal
  • 4 days TransCanada Boasts Long-Term Commitments For Keystone XL
  • 4 days Nigeria Files Suit Against JP Morgan Over Oil Field Sale
  • 4 days Chinese Oil Ships Found Violating UN Sanctions On North Korea
  • 4 days Oil Slick From Iranian Tanker Explosion Is Now The Size Of Paris
  • 4 days Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 4 days Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 4 days OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 5 days Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 5 days Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 5 days Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 5 days API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 5 days Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 5 days EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 5 days IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 6 days Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 6 days Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 6 days Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 6 days Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 6 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 6 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 6 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 6 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 7 days India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 7 days India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 7 days Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 7 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 7 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 7 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 7 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
Alt Text

Algae May Be Green Energy’s Secret Weapon

A new breakthrough from Cambridge…

Alt Text

Fuel Cell Breakthrough Lowers Costs And Ups Capacity

Scientists from the University of…

Andrew Topf

Andrew Topf

With over a decade of journalistic experience working in newspapers, trade publications and as a mining reporter, Andrew Topf is a seasoned business writer. Andrew also…

More Info

Korea Leaves West Behind In Fuel Cell Race

Korea Leaves West Behind In Fuel Cell Race

When George W. Bush proclaimed in 2003 that “the first car driven by a child born today could be powered by hydrogen and pollution-free,” the former U.S. President was suggesting the United States could reduce its dependence on foreign oil and be more environmentally friendly to boot. At the time, Bush’s $1.2 billion hydrogen fuel initiative was seen as forward-thinking by environmentalists, though it certainly had its critics.

The initiative was aimed at lowering the cost of producing hydrogen enough to make fuel-cell vehicles competitive with gas-powered ones by 2010, but 12 years later, it is clear that “the hydrogen highway” is still a long way from being built.

With only a handful of hydrogen fuel stations in the U.S., mostly in California, there is virtually no demand for hydrogen cars, and with only a few hundred of the vehicles produced annually, there is equally low incentive to build the fuelling infrastructure for them.

A Volkswagen executive recently said that hydrogen fuel vehicles are hopeless outside Japan, where there are extensive government subsidies, but a short hop away, in South Korea, fuel cells are taking off - and not just under a car hood. Related: Investors Turning Away From Green Energy

Recently, South Korean conglomerates have been partnering with U.S. fuel-cell makers to make the systems more economical, since they are primarily being targeted for commercial and industrial uses.

While fuel cells are often mentioned in the context of hydrogen-powered cars, they also have applications as primary and secondary power supply at industrial sites; fuel cells can also be used to power homes. All fuel cell technology works under the same principle: hydrogen gas is fed into one side of the fuel cell, while air is fed into the other. Hydrogen passes through the layers of the fuel cell, inducing a positive and negative charge, which generates an electrical current. The hydrogen combines with the oxygen to form H20. Individual fuel cells can be stacked to provide more power.

As a major energy importer, specifically liquefied natural gas, South Korea is looking to diversify its energy mix beyond fossil fuels and nuclear. As an example, by 2030 Seoul is planning to meet 20 percent of its energy demands from renewable energy sources, with 10 percent sourced from fuel cells – enough to power 400,000 homes. Related: Terawatt Solar Farms By 2050?

Last year the world’s largest fuel cell plant opened in Hwasung City, on the northwest coast. The 5.1-acre facility consists of 21 2.8-megawatt hydrogen fuel cells supplied by FuelCell Energy, of Danbury, Connecticut. The 59-MW fuel cell park is owned and operated by POSCO Energy, Korea’s largest independent power producer.

In another U.S.-Korean fuel cell partnership, Doosan Fuel Cell America announced on May 5 that six of its power plants have gone live in a Seoul suburb, providing 2.6MW of energy.

In March, British fuel-cell maker AFC Energy Plc agreed to work with two South Korean companies in a deal that could be worth up to $1 billion over 10 years. Backed by Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich, the project is with Samyoung Corp. and Chang Shin Chemical Co., who will initially install 50MW of fuel cells in Daesan, South Korea. Related: Can Cigarettes Beat Tesla At The Energy Storage Game?

Older deals include LG Corp. taking a 51 percent stake in Rolls Royce Holdings Plc’s Fuel Cell Systems, and GE agreeing to manufacture fuel cells in the U.S. and Asia with South Korean company GS Caltex Corp.

While the fuel cell focus is on industrials, the North Asian nation hasn’t forgotten about the automotive market. In 2014 Hyundai Motor Co. introduced the world’s first mass-produced fuel cell car, the Tucson SUV, and according to the Korean Ministry of the Environment, the government is looking to supply at least 1,000 hydrogen vehicles and 10 charging stations by 2020.

Of course, the success of that initiative will depend on consumer uptake, but already, it appears that South Korea is becoming a leader in the adoption of fuel cell technology. According to Navigant Research, the country will have the largest share of the $1-billion stationary fuel cell market this year, a market that will reach $15 billion by 2022.

By Andrew Topf of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • John Scior on June 01 2015 said:
    Fuel cells cannot be a source of energy only a storage medium. If say the original power source wherein the hydrogen is generated, then thusly that is the source of the power and thereby how can Seoul source 10 percent of its power from fuel cells ??
  • Seth on June 01 2015 said:
    Headline reads, "Korea Leaves West Behind In Fuel Cell Race."

    Then the article goes on to mention that the Fuel Cell plants are a partnership between Korean and U.S. firms. Isn't the U.S. in the "West?"
  • Jim Seko on June 01 2015 said:
    I used to be a supporter of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles but I've changed my mind based on some things I've learned in the past year.

    Currently, 95% of commercially available hydrogen comes from steam reformation of natural gas. This is mainly because hydrogen from clean energy is quite expensive, about $12 per kilogram. A kilogram of hydrogen is the energy equivalent to a gallon of gasoline. Clean hydrogen is expensive because of inefficency. Roughly 75% of the energy is wasted.
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8d/Battery_EV_vs._Hydrogen_EV.png/1050px-Battery_EV_vs._Hydrogen_EV.png
  • Charlie Peters on June 04 2015 said:
    * Do you want $2 Gasoline at the pump?

    * Do you want clean air and water?

    Ethanol waiver and elimination of E-85 flex fuel credit can cut our ozone & CO2 transportation pollution over 50%

    Let’s improve performance of CA Climate change law AB 32 (Pavley) in 2015 for future generations

    Is it time for an Attorney General, EPA conversation?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News