• 3 hours Gunmen Kidnap Nigerian Oil Workers In Oil-Rich Delta Area
  • 5 hours Libya’s NOC Restarts Oil Fields
  • 6 hours US Orion To Develop Gas Field In Iraq
  • 3 days U.S. On Track To Unseat Saudi Arabia As No.2 Oil Producer In the World
  • 3 days Senior Interior Dept. Official Says Florida Still On Trump’s Draft Drilling Plan
  • 3 days Schlumberger Optimistic In 2018 For Oilfield Services Businesses
  • 3 days Only 1/3 Of Oil Patch Jobs To Return To Canada After Downturn Ends
  • 3 days Statoil, YPF Finalize Joint Vaca Muerta Development Deal
  • 3 days TransCanada Boasts Long-Term Commitments For Keystone XL
  • 3 days Nigeria Files Suit Against JP Morgan Over Oil Field Sale
  • 4 days Chinese Oil Ships Found Violating UN Sanctions On North Korea
  • 4 days Oil Slick From Iranian Tanker Explosion Is Now The Size Of Paris
  • 4 days Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 4 days Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 4 days OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 4 days Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 4 days Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 4 days Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 5 days API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 5 days Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 5 days EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 5 days IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 5 days Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 5 days Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 5 days Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 5 days Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 6 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 6 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 6 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 6 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 6 days India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 6 days India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 6 days Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 7 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 7 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 7 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 7 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 7 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 7 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 7 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
Alt Text

Sweden Burns H&M Clothes As Fuel

A power plant in Stockholm…

Alt Text

Bioplastics Threaten Big Oil

Global oil demand is set…

Alt Text

Oil Refiners And Farmers Battle Over Biofuels

Trump has agreed to meet…

The Truth About Biofuels!

The Truth About Biofuels!

Just a few decades ago, “biofuels” were all the rage in the media, as many well respected “power pundits’ predicted that they would eventually prove to be a leading “vanguard” movement amongst a variety of well touted alternate energy options.

Then recently, over the past 2 years, as the prices of crude oil began to rise to historically elevated levels and even the most dedicated “oil optimists” began to worry when or if the ascent would top off , ‘biofuels” where once again purported to be our “Super Saviors” that would eventually satisfy a great deal of our energy needs.

Now that we’ve had 40 years to observe the actual effects and realities of biofuels, we have a wonderful opportunity to truly gauge the “real world” results and determine for ourselves, whether they are a realistic alternative, or just another over hyped fuel.

First of all, what exactly are biofuels?  Bio-fuels are what are known as “Renewable Fuels” in the sense that they are processed exclusively from organic materials such as plants and animals; often referred to as “Biomass.” There are two distinct types of fuel labeled as bio-fuels; one is “Bioethanol,” known to most people simply as “Ethanol” and the other fuel is “Biodiesel.”

Ethanol is the primary substitute for gasoline / petrol utilized to run most road driven transport vehicles. The fuel is produced by the sugar fermentation process, derived from carbohydrate rich plants such as corn, wheat sugar cane and straw, as well as willow and numerous other poplar trees, sawdust, wild grasses, cereal, sugar beets, sorghum, even Jerusalem artichokes.

Biodiesel is the alternative fuel utilized to replace conventional “fossil fuel” diesel. It is manufactured through a process called “transesterification” and derived from a vast number of raw, oil bearing crops such as soybeans, rape seed and palms and used vegetable oils, as well as algae, various animal fats, beef tallow and even fish oil.

So now that we know precisely what we are talking about, what have the results panned out to be? Judging from a neutral “Pros and Cons” perspective, have biofuels:

(A) Shown to be the highly hyped and hoped for harbingers of planet saving, inexpensive, renewable energy.

or

(B) Begun to show previously unsuspected limitations and disappointments, as many well intended but scientifically unproven predictions start to evaporate under the hot light of 40 years of factual observation?

On the positive side, biofuels are unquestionably renewable, which is a powerful benefit as we begin to face the facts about our progressively diminishing supplies of fossil fuels. Also, depending on where we choose to put our priorities, biofuels could quite easily prove to be practically limitless, as long as we are willing to take crops originally grown to feed people and animals and divert those food resources to the processes of making fuel!

Last but not least of the positive advantages of biofuels is the fact that these fuels do give off less harmful waste products, smoke and pollutants than traditional fossil fuel do, so that’s definitely a very big “Plus” for biofuels.

However, on the other side of the coin is the fact that even with all the media, corporate, governmental and social support, high hopes and big plans for biofuels, not only have these renewable, alternative fuel sources NOT replaced fossil fuels, but world wide, they are a mere “2.6%” of our fuel currently utilized to energize the planet.

Meanwhile, major oil companies such as Esso, Chevron, Murco, Prax and Topaz still have not successfully been able to supply a biofuels that actually meets environmental standards while BP (British Petroleum) reports a mere 4% of its biofuels as currently meeting necessary environmental standards!

World wide oil companies, research corporations, bankers, investors and governments around the globe openly confess that they are still loosing billions of dollars annually, simply trying to get biofuels “up to par” in both fuel efficiency as well as environmental regulations. Some companies are going broke while others have completely gone under!

Now many prominent ecologists and  biologists are concerned that biofuels are not only eating up much of the worlds financial resources, but also in danger of eating up the worlds food resources, as more and more foodstuff is now being taken away from the moths of hungry people and processed to create energy and effectively drive industry.

Others scientists are beginning to bemoan the effect of all the additional methane and other gases now being released during biofuel production, doing great damage to the earth by increasing the “green house gasses!”

So, at least as far as the facts of today are concerned, biofuels are still, at this point, a mixed blessing with a side order of some unexpected curses that seriously need to be carefully monitored. Only time will tell if these renewable, alternative fuel sources ever prove to live up to the high expectations predicted back in the late 60s and early 70s, but it’s important to keep an open mind while we keep our eyes open regarding the future of biofuels!




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on October 16 2010 said:
    The article about biofuels has not mentioned the misantrophy brought about by growth skepticism.It should be known that it can affect social & economic stability, environmental conservation & protection, public governance and safety, energy, communication & transportation improvements and many more.You are missing the point about this wide philosopical and ideological phenomenon - and some people are justifying their hatred of human achivements, especially today.I know it is important that keeping eyes open and keeping an open mind are there regarding biofuels development. More important, though, that there are real concerns about the impact of growth skepticism have on people's minds. It's the worse thing you might see which is the wrongheaded - and misanthropic - approach towards economic growth and social change.
  • Anonymous on October 16 2010 said:
    And remember: I am going to write down about the real aspects of growth skepticism that exists even today. Please be careful of the claims by some people who are deemed misanthropic (in my opinion).Thank you.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News