• 4 minutes USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 10 minutes IT IS FINISHED. OPEC Victorious
  • 16 minutes GOODBYE FOREIGN OIL DEPENDENCE!!
  • 2 hours Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 19 hours The Great Climate Change Swindle
  • 6 hours End of EV Subsidies?
  • 2 mins Price Decline in Chinese Solar Panels
  • 7 hours Maersk's COO statment.
  • 3 hours Trump accuses Google Of Hiding 'Fair Media' Coverage of him
  • 1 day S. Australia showing the way
  • 21 hours China Builds LNG Icebreaker
  • 1 hour EPA To Roll Back Carbon Rule On New Coal Plants
  • 1 day More OPEC Members May Leave
  • 24 hours Exxon buys green power.
  • 2 days Not only GM: Morgan Stanley Predicts Ford to Cut 25,000 Jobs in Overhaul
  • 1 day Feudalism: The Most Resilient System?
Alt Text

Research Unveils New Promising Biofuel

New research suggests that young…

Alt Text

U.S. Poised To Ease Biofuel Quotas

Though biofuel technology is moving…

Alt Text

How Carbon Capture Can Be Profitable

Despite being critical in the…

Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Mad Hedge Fund Trader

John Thomas, The Mad Hedge Fund Trader is one of today's most successful Hedge Fund Managers and a 40 year veteran of the financial markets.…

More Info

Trending Discussions

The Great Ethanol Boondoggle

One of my biggest disappointments with Obama so far is his continued support of the ethanol boondoggle. The program was ramped up by the Bush administration to achieve energy independence by subsidizing the production of alcohol from domestically grown corn. Add clean burning moonshine (yes, it's the same alcohol—C2H5OH), whose combustion products are carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O), to gasoline and emissions also go down.

The irony is that if you include all the upstream and downstream inputs, the process consumes far more energy than it produces. It also demands massive quantities of fresh water, which someday will become more valuable than the oil the ethanol is supposed to replace, turning it into toxic waste.

Few consumers are aware of how big the ethanol industry has grown in such a short period. Ethanol consumption of corn has soared from 1.6 billion bushels in 2006 to an anticipated 4.3 billion bushels this year. Ethanol's share of our total corn crop has skyrocketed from 14% to 33% during the same period. Corn grown for ethanol now occupies 10% of the total arable land in the US.

Ethanol's impact on food prices has been huge. It is the sole reason why corn is trading at the $4 handle, instead of $2, and soybeans are trading at $10, instead of $4. You also have to add in the inflationary effects on downstream grain consumers, like the food manufacturers and the cattle industry. While spendthrift, obese Americans burn food so they can drive chrome wheeled black Hummers to Wal-Mart, much of Africa and Asia starve. A global food crisis is not that far off.

This ignores the reality that Brazil, the world's largest ethanol producer, can ferment all the ethanol it wants at one third our cost because they make it from much more efficient sugarcane, which has five times the caloric content of corn. They also have ideal weather. However, protective import quotas and tariffs prevent meaningful quantities of foreign ethanol imports.

Bush financed all of this wasteful pork, because Iowa has an early primary, giving it an outsized influence in selecting presidential candidates, and has two crucial Senate seats as well. Well, it turns out that Obama needs Iowa even more than Bush, where the Democrats are ahead 3-2 in the House, and have a tie in the Senate (1-1), so the ethanol program not only lives on, it is prospering.

Ethanol has become such of big industry that it now commands a fairly large footprint in Washington, fielding armies of lobbyists to keep the subsidies and tax breaks flowing from the appropriate agricultural committees. The problem for the rest of this is that once these lobbies become entrenched they are almost impossible to get rid of. Think of an advanced case of scabies. Remember the tobacco lobby?

Shame, and double shame. Better to drink ethanol than burn it, I say.

By. Mad Hedge Fund Trader




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on September 07 2010 said:
    Where do I begin? The USDA study that was issued this year on the energy balance of ethanol concluded that there is a 2.3 to 1 positive energy balance in the production of BTU's. In other words you get 2.3 times the BTU's from ethanol than is used to produce it. This includes upstream and downstream inputs.It is true that about 33% of this year's corn crop will be used when making ehtanol, but let's take a closer look at that. For every 3 pounds of corn we use for ethanol one pound of DDGS (animal feed) is produced. Since only the starch has been removed from the corn, this animal feed byproduct has 1.7 times the nutrient value of corn. So we start by using 33% and a third of that is returned to the food chain leaving us with a 11% of a feed that has a 1.7 value ratio (18.7) or a net usage of 14.3% of the corn for fuel.The World Food Bank released a report in 2010 stating that corn ethanol production had very little impact on food costs in 2008.
  • Anonymous on September 09 2010 said:
    Where do you begin is right. Here are some of the reasons we should switch to ethanol. It is a superior fuel to gasoline, it burns better, has a higher flashpoint thus will allow more efficient engine technologies. In short ethanol is CLEAN DIESEL. Also farmers can't farm $2/bushel corn. Get a brain man, if it wasn't for ethanol we'd have a crisis on the farmbelt, just what this country needs. Ethanol provides price stability for farmers.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
-->