• 3 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 7 minutes Saudi and UAE pressure to get US support for Oil quotas is reportedly on..
  • 11 minutes China devalues currency to lower prices to address new tariffs. But doesn't help. Here is why. . . .
  • 15 minutes What is your current outlook as a day trader for WTI
  • 49 mins Domino Effect: Rashida Tlaib Rejects Israel's Offer For 'Humanitarian' Visit To West Bank
  • 50 mins In The Bright Of New Administration Rules: Immigrants as Economic Contributors
  • 12 hours Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
  • 11 hours Movie Script: Epstein Guards Suspected Of Falsifying Logs
  • 1 day Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 3 hours Continental Resource's Hamm (Trump Buddy) wants shale to cut production.Can't compete with peers. Stock will drop in half again.
  • 19 hours Gretta Thunbergs zero carbon voyage carbon foot print of carbon fibre manufacture
  • 2 days Significant: Boeing Delays Delivery Of Ultra-Long-Range Version Of 777X
  • 11 hours US Petroleum Demand Strongest Since 2007
  • 1 day NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
  • 2 days Why Oil is Falling (including conspiracy theories and other fun stuff)
  • 52 days To be(lieve) or Not To be(lieve): U.S. Treasury Secretary Says U.S.-China Trade Deal Is 90% Done
Jen Alic

Jen Alic

 

More Info

Premium Content

Exxon’s $100m Algae Investment Falls Flat

Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) is cutting its losses on algae biofuels after investing over $100 million only to find that it couldn’t achieve commercial viability.

Earlier this week, Exxon announced that while it wasn’t throwing in the towel, it would be forced to restructure its algae research with partner California-based Synthetic Genomics Inc (SGI).

When the two launched their algae-derived biofuels program in 2009, Exxon planned to invest around $600 million with the goal of developing algae fuels within 10 years.

Related article: Investment Boost for Next Generation Biodiesel Project

But it’s been more complicated than expected, and after $100 million down the drain, it has become clear that much more research—and at least another decade and half—are needed.

Exxon spokesman Charles Englemann told Bloomberg that the partners had “gained significant understanding of the challenges that must be overcome to deliver scalable algae-based biofuels.”

What they were hoping to achieve on a commercially viable scale was the exploitation of algae as a source of oil that could be converted in existing refineries into transportation fuels. 

According to Synthetic Genomics’ Chief Technology Officer James Flatt, the research has demonstrated that simple modifications of natural algae are not sufficient for commercial scale production. Research will now be shifted to focus on developing new strains of algae that can reproduce quicker. Or simply put, they will need to change the metabolism of algae. 

Related article: Waste Wood: Norway Taps into a Huge Source of Biomass Fuel

For SGI, it means a new agreement that allows it to get rid of the market pressure and focus on real research, getting back to the basic science. Exxon and SGI announced a new co-funding agreement that will bring their relationship into the above-mentioned phase II.

What does it mean for algae? It’s still growing on everyone, but there’s no commercial quick fix.

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • anonymous on May 29 2013 said:
    "the research has demonstrated that simple modifications of natural algae are not sufficient for commercial scale production"

    Incorrect!!! There is plenty of existing algae strains that already have 30-60% oil content that are not genetically modified.

    All algae ponds have daily contamination issues and very low production. The EPA will never allow genetically modified algae grow in open ponds. It must be grown in large enclosed growing systems that can do 10x the production.

    In order to be profitable at commercial algae production you must need a minimum of 110 acres of "enclosed growing systems", not open ponds. Ponds have been used for research. Not commercial algae production.

    It was a flawed plan from the start using open ponds. Maybe Exxxon did not realize that the DOE Biomass Program's Acquatic Species Program years ago was a complete failure. Open ponds will never be used for commercial algae production.
  • eddie willers on May 31 2013 said:
    LOL....anonymous knows more that EXXON.
  • anonymous on May 31 2013 said:
    With all do respect, you can purchase existing algae strains with 30-60% lipid content (off-the-shelf) from some labs.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play