follow us like us subscribe contact us
Loading, please wait

Russia Loses Leverage with China on Gas Deal

By Nick Cunningham | Thu, 10 April 2014 21:02 | 5

Russian President Vladimir Putin obviously thinks that preventing Ukraine from moving closer to the West is a strategic interest and one that is important enough to risk international condemnation. Seizing Crimea has led to negative international opinion, capital flight, deteriorating relations with Europe, and a potential enormous toll to the Russian economy. It has also threatened to permanently damage the commercial relationship Russia has with its largest energy customer – Western Europe.

That has clearly accelerated the deal that Russia is trying to finalize with China on natural gas. It may seem odd that the two countries have let a gas deal go undone for so long – they are some of the largest energy producers and consumers in the world, respectively, and are close neighbors. But with very few interconnections and a dispute over pricing, Russia hasn’t been able to sell much natural gas to its neighbor. To get gas flowing into China, Russia will need to build a $22 billion pipeline – the Power of Siberia pipeline – that traverses Siberia and runs all the way to Vladivostok on the Pacific Coast. Along the way, the pipeline will have three interconnecting points on the Chinese border, allowing China to offload natural gas in a variety of places. Once completed in 2018, Gazprom could send 38 billion cubic meters per year to China, which is equivalent to about 24% of the total that Russia sells to Europe.

Related Article: Russia’s New Weapons: Passports and Pipelines

But Russia has lost leverage in the negotiations with China as it has become more eager to seal the deal on the prospect that Europe will increasingly shift away from Russian gas. Russia’s Deputy Prime Minister appeared in China April 9 and made news by saying that the two nations are zeroing in on a deal. He said that he hoped a deal could be signed in May ahead of Putin’s visit to Beijing.

“We’re working now to sign a gas contract in May,” said Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich, according to ITAR-TASS. “Consultations are continuing and Gazprom's leaders are holding talks with Chinese partners on the contract terms. We hope to conclude the contract in May and believe it should come into effect by the year end. Base price is the only problem to be solved,” Dvorkovich said at a session of a Russia-China intergovernmental commission on energy co-operation, co-chaired by Chinese Vice-Premier Zhang Gaoli. Also, Gazprom said on April 10 that its Asian customers may be willing to pay for their shipments in Euros, a strategy the company is likely seeking to avoid being trapped by U.S. sanctions.

Dvorkovich seems to have downplayed the importance of the base price, which has been a sticking point holding up the deal for years. With a newly determined European Union seeking to improve its energy security, Russia has few other options but to give in on pricing. China has been seeking a price for natural gas below that which Europe receives, around $10.50 per million Btu. Bloomberg notes that Gazprom needs to sell at a price of around $13.50 per million Btu to make the yet-to-be-developed pipeline and natural gas fields profitable. But, it appears Russia may be willing to eat the costs to get the deal done.

Related Article: Russian Sanctions and the Negative Effect on Global Energy Security

Vladimir Putin would like the world to think that the deal would be a coup for Russia. It would demonstrate to Europe that Russia has other customers hungry for its energy resources, and that Russia does not fear a confrontation with the West over Ukraine. And if Russia’s Asian customers pay in Euros, Russia is also showing that it does not fear even the heaviest of moves that the U.S. would be able to muster. Still, Russia getting the deal done by caving to China on price would not actually be a show of strength, it would demonstrate Russia negotiating from a position of weakness.

By Nicholas Cunningham of Oilprice.com

About the author

Contributor
Nick Cunningham
Company: Oilprice.com

More recent articles by Nick Cunningham

Thu 20 November 2014
State Budgets Reeling from Low Oil Prices
Wed 19 November 2014
Spectacular Fall From Grace For Former Brazilian Oil Tycoon
Tue 18 November 2014
Iran Negotiations, OPEC Meeting Loom For Oil Markets
Mon 17 November 2014
Coal Baron Indicted For Role In Mine Disaster
Sun 16 November 2014
Kurdistan And Baghdad Make Interim Oil Deal

Leave a comment

  • Robert Berke on April 11 2014 said:
    Good reporting, keen observations, well researched. My only question is I think you focus too much on the negotiations over price. No doubt China will get a good price, but recall also that the pipeline ends at the Pacific for a good reason. Russia tends to ship gas to other markets, including Japan, S. Korea, and maybe N. Korea. In that sense, the China deal will pay for all the infrastructure costs, while providing a fair profit, while the other Pacific markets can not hope to get the deal that China negotiates. Secondly, recall that China could well finance the entire construction costs as it did with Rosneft's oil deal, without breathing hard.
  • Rufus on April 11 2014 said:
    Russia and China. one with energy the other with a billion people. Sounds like Western Europe is playing with fire.
  • Forward thinker on April 11 2014 said:
    China will really laugh it's way to the bank on this, however, they need to be cautious that they have diverse suppliers or they will find that Russia will use supply as a weapon against them when it suits them after the crisis in Europe.
  • CrazyCooter on April 12 2014 said:
    Good stuff. On a related tangent, the Power of Siberia line appears to be comparable to the gas pipeline being kicked around in Alaska. IIRC it is in the ball park of 40-60B in construction and needs 12.5M/BTU export to break even, but hard numbers have been sketchy to find.

    Nick, I would really love to see a break down that compares the two, especially since LNG leaving AK would very likely end up in Chinese ports pending export laws being kicked around by the administration.

    Regards,

    Cooter
  • Roland on April 13 2014 said:
    @Burke: LNG sells for ~$16/mcf in Japan, SoKorea, and China, delivered. It costs ~$6/mcf to liquefy and ship. Plus, this price will drop as soon as Chevron starts shipping LNG from Gorgon, WestAust. Mozambique channel will drive prices down further. Late arrivals lose big.

Leave a comment