WTI Crude


Brent Crude


Natural Gas




Heating Oil


Rotate device for more commodity prices

Alt Text

5 Top Marijuana Stocks For 2017

The marijuana market is growing…

Alt Text

Iraq Sees No Need For Further OPEC Oil Output Cuts

As OPEC and non-OPEC producers…

Alt Text

Does Russia Really Need The OPEC Deal?

OPEC and Russia are leading…

Michael McDonald

Michael McDonald

Michael is an assistant professor of finance and a frequent consultant to companies regarding capital structure decisions and investments. He holds a PhD in finance…

More Info

Elon Musk's Hyperloop: Expensive, But Doable

Elon Musk's Hyperloop: Expensive, But Doable

One of the most interesting developments in the transportation industry right now is the initial work being done on Elon Musk’s Hyperloop concept. The concept is starting to take shape in the form of a couple of independent efforts to develop prototype test tracks for a Hyperloop. It is unclear when these test tracks will finally become operational or what they will reveal about the technical feasibility of the Hyperloop (though the caliber of work done on the concept thus far suggests the idea has promise, as evidenced by the extensive study originally put out by Musk’s team).

Setting aside the technical issues involved in actually building the Hyperloop, one critical factor in whether the system will ever be constructed is its cost. Because the system is theoretical right now, cost estimates are going to vary widely, but it is possible to come up with a reasonable ballpark estimate.

To look at the cost of the Hyperloop, it’s important to distinguish exactly where the two end points of the system would be. Musk has talked about using the Hyperloop to connect LA and San Francisco. That distance spans about 382 miles. Related: Saudis Planning For A War Of Attrition In Europe With Russia’s Oil Industry

So how much would a Hyperloop from LA to San Francisco cost?

The Hyperloop essentially consists of three parts; the pylons that hold up the tube track, the tube track itself, and the pods that “ride” in the tube. This cost explicitly excludes the cost of land since the most efficient way to build the track would be over state property (like railroad or highway rights), but that issue remains very much up in the air. The interval between pylons depends heavily on the type of materials used in the tube construction and the width of the pylons themselves. As a result, calculating the exact number of pylons needed is tricky, but assuming a reasonable 100 feet between each pylon (versus 50 feet apart for the Golden Gate bridge cables), that means there are about 54 pylons per mile. Related: Korea Leading The Way With Ambitious Fuel Cell Project

Assuming a circular pylon diameter of around 10 feet, and a height of forty feet, that implies roughly 46 cubic yards of concrete per pylon. Concrete prices per yard vary, of course, but are often around $100 per cubic yard for the material itself. Adding an additional $900 per yard for labor, grading work, structural reinforcement, regulatory paperwork, etc. and a further $20,000 for steel brackets to hold the tube implies a cost per pylon of $64,000 each. This suggests the pylons for 1 mile would cost about $3.46 million or a total of $1.3 billion for the entire LA to San Francisco route.

Assessing the cost of the tube is harder since it would likely be manufactured in a factory and then assembled on site via cranes, but railroad track which is somewhat similar, in concept at least, costs about $1.5 million per mile. Tripling that figure, to be conservative, gives a cost per mile for the Hyperloop tube of about $5 million per mile, and then multiplying by two (for two, one way tubes) gives a total cost of $10 million per mile or $3.8 billion for the entire 382 mile distance. Related: OPEC’s Strategy Is Working According To Cartel’s Latest Report

Finally, the pods for the Hyperloop would also likely be built in a factory, with price heavily dependent on volume, given the traditional cost curve in transportation economics. A reasonable comparison here though might be passenger cars used on trains in the northeast or estimates given for California’s bullet train cars which are larger than most Hyperloop pod designs and thus might be a conservative comparison to use in this situation. Those cars often cost around $3 million each versus NYC subway cars at $1.3 million each. Assuming an average between the two gives a number of around $2 million per car. Assuming each pod holds 25 passengers and the ride takes 1 hour each way, then each pod could run perhaps 2 trips each way during the peak daily travel period for a total of 200 daily passengers per pod (i.e. two trips from LA to SF and back in the morning and then a second pair in the afternoon/evening). To accommodate 10 million passengers annually (27,000 passengers daily) then would require about 150 pods (given downtime/maintenance needs).

Adding these figures up, $1.3 billion for pylons, $3.8 billion for tube, and $300 million for pods gives a total cost of about $5.4 billion or about $14 million per mile. This compares to a cost per mile for interstate highway of $10 million or more in urban areas and nearly $20 million per mile for highway in California. The cost for the Hyperloop’s real competition, California’s bullet train? Nearly $100 billion. Clearly the Hyperloop looks like a relative bargain here, though not an unrealistic one.

By Michael McDonald of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • BobMax43 on November 17 2015 said:
    The estimate in the original proposal was a tubes from San Francisco to Los Angeles would cost just $6 billion or $7.5 billion. depending on whether the pods could transport cars. Your estimate ain't bad...
  • Bob Wallace on November 17 2015 said:
    Doing a price comparison with other modes of travel such as airplanes can be tricky.

    While the cost of the pylons and tubes might be pricey they might have an extremely long life. The oldest subway in operation was built in 1863. The tube system could have a similar or longer life. There's nothing to wear out, the pods won't even contact the inner walls of the tubes. Amortize the tube system over 100 or 200 years and the price is a lot more reasonable.

    And consider the cost of climate change. The Hyperloop, if it works, is our best option for replacing most air travel. Faster, cheaper, more comfortable (no turbulence stuff). Worst case, we'd tube to Anchorage and use a plane to hop to the Asian mainland, then back into a tube. Or from NE Canada to the west coast of Europe. We could do 90+% of our long distance travel on renewable energy.
  • Steve Rosenberg on November 20 2015 said:
    My high school geometry is 50 years past, but I believe a pylon that is 10' in diameter and 40' tall would be 116 cubic yards, and not 46 as stated in the article.

    Am I wrong?
  • Tim Moore on November 30 2015 said:
    Approximately 51.2 pylons, not 54 per mile.

    Yes Steve, you're right. Cylinder volume = pi * r^2 * h
    is in this case, 3.14 * 5 * 5 * 40 = 3,140 cu ft
    or 116 cu yards

    These two corrections, one up and one down, gives $136,000 per pylon, ~$7M per mile, ~$2.7B for all pylons, and $6.8B for whole project, which BobMax43 says Elon got as a rough number, too.
  • Rajesh on May 12 2016 said:
    You need to compare this to the cost of air travel as well.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News