• 3 hours U.S. On Track To Unseat Saudi Arabia As No.2 Oil Producer In the World
  • 5 hours Senior Interior Dept. Official Says Florida Still On Trump’s Draft Drilling Plan
  • 7 hours Schlumberger Optimistic In 2018 For Oilfield Services Businesses
  • 9 hours Only 1/3 Of Oil Patch Jobs To Return To Canada After Downturn Ends
  • 12 hours Statoil, YPF Finalize Joint Vaca Muerta Development Deal
  • 13 hours TransCanada Boasts Long-Term Commitments For Keystone XL
  • 15 hours Nigeria Files Suit Against JP Morgan Over Oil Field Sale
  • 22 hours Chinese Oil Ships Found Violating UN Sanctions On North Korea
  • 1 day Oil Slick From Iranian Tanker Explosion Is Now The Size Of Paris
  • 1 day Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 1 day Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 1 day OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 2 days Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 2 days Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 2 days Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 2 days API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 2 days Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 2 days EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 2 days IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 2 days Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 3 days Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 3 days Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 3 days Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 3 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 3 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 3 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 3 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 4 days India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 4 days India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 4 days Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 4 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 4 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 4 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 4 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 4 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 4 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 5 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
  • 5 days Iranian Oil Tanker Sinks After Second Explosion
  • 7 days Russia To Discuss Possible Exit From OPEC Deal
  • 7 days Iranian Oil Tanker Drifts Into Japanese Waters As Fires Rage On
Alt Text

BP To Take Final Hit On 2010 Disaster

British Petroleum is set to…

Top 5 Unanswered Questions About The BP Oil Spill

Top 5 Unanswered Questions About The BP Oil Spill


In this Wednesday, April 21, 2010 aerial file photo taken in the Gulf of Mexico more than 50 miles southeast of Venice on Louisiana’s tip, an oil slick is seen as the Deepwater Horizon oil rig burns. CREDIT: AP PHOTO/GERALD HERBERT, FILE

It’s officially been five years since BP’s Deepwater Horizon disaster, a well blowout and subsequent oil spill that caused the deaths of 11 men.

A lot has happened since — a massive cleanup effort, scientific research on impacts, civil and criminal court cases galore. But the answers to many basic questions about the historic tragedy remain either unknown and unclear.

On this five-year anniversary, here are five important things we still don’t know about the largest accidental oil spill in world history.

How much oil actually spilled

When people talk about how much oil was spilled during the Deepwater Horizon disaster, there are often two different figures tossed around. Some people use the U.S. government’s figure, which is 4.2 million barrels, or 176 million U.S. gallons. Others use BP’s, which is 3.19 million barrels, or 134 million gallons.


Oil from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill is seen floating on the surface of the water in Plaquemines Parish, La. CREDIT: AP PHOTO/GERALD HERBERT, FILE

The truth is, no one can really know how much oil was spilled during the 87 days that crude flowed out of the Macondo well and into the Gulf of Mexico. In a January ruling, the federal judge presiding over the Clean Water Act case against BP wrote about the difficulties in estimating exactly how much oil spilled during the disaster in 2010. Related: These Major Players Could Make Or Break The EV Market

“There is no way to know with precision how much oil discharged into the Gulf of Mexico,” he wrote. “There was no meter counting off each barrel of oil as it exited the well. The experts used a variety of methods to estimate the cumulative discharge. None of these were perfect. Because data from the well is limited, every expert had to make some assumptions while performing his calculations.”

How much BP will have to pay

In that January ruling, federal District Court Judge Carl Barbier found that, legally, BP should be held responsible for spilling 3.19 million barrels, a figure that’s about a million barrels less than the U.S. government’s estimate. That was big news for BP, because it decreased the maximum fine the oil giant would be subject to from $18 billion to $13.7 billion.

Still, we aren’t yet sure exactly how much BP will have to pay in Clean Water Act fines — right now, we just know the maximum. BP challenged Judge Barbier’s ruling in February, but the judge hasn’t yet made a final decision as to how much BP is subject to in fines.

BP says that so far, it’s paid out $5 billion to people in businesses in the Gulf that were affected, a figure that’s separate from the Clean Water Act fines. BP, which has tried and failed to challenge the 2012 settlement in the past, says that it’s paid a total of $28 billion on the spill, a figure that includes response, cleanup, claims payments and some restoration work.

How human health has been affected

Questions still remain over the BP oil spill’s overall impact on public health in the Gulf.

Researchers from the National Institute of Health are still working to try to assess how the spill affected Gulf residents, and are working on a 10-year Gulf Long-term Follow-up Study (GuLF STUDY), which involves monitoring the health of 33,000 oil spill cleanup workers for 10 years.


Oil cleanup workers in Gulf Shores, Ala., Friday, July 2, 2010. CREDIT: AP PHOTO/DAVE MARTIN

According to preliminary results, these workers felt more physical and mental symptoms in the aftermath of the spill than non-cleanup workers did. But research for the study is still ongoing, and since it aims to compile 10 years worth of data, it will be a few years before we know the final results. Related: Is Saudi Arabia Setting The World Up For Major Oil Price Spike?

NIH research has also found that residents — not just workers — struggled in the aftermath of the spill. The research is ongoing — it’s in its final year — but so far scientists have found that 30 to 40 percent of the residents in Franklin County, Florida and Baldwin County, Alabama experienced mental health issues in the two years after the spill, compared with 10 to 13 percent of who experienced these issues before. Even now, five years later, incidence of mental health issues is still higher than usual for the area.

A lot of the anger, anxiety, and depression reported by the residents was related to income insecurity. According to the research, the spill destroyed livelihoods for fishermen and others who depended on a healthy Gulf.

How the deep sea will fare

Just after publishing a study on the BP oil spill’s impacts this past summer, Penn State biology professor Charles Fisher told ThinkProgress that he was “worried” about the deep sea.

“The ocean is under a lot of pressure, and the shallows have already felt it very seriously … the deep sea is starting to feel it as well,” he said. “We’re continuing to monitor, because we’re really not sure how it’s going to turn out in the end.”


Marine reef ecologist Scott Porter holds coral samples he removed from an oil rig in waters, Monday, June 7, 2010, in the Gulf of Mexico south of Venice, La. CREDIT: AP PHOTO/ERIC GAY

Fisher was specifically talking about deep sea corals affected by the spill. He and his team had discovered two new coral reefs near the site of the disaster, and found that the negative impacts to those reefs from the spill were greater than expected. Those reefs were farther away and deeper than the one coral reef that had previously been found to have been impacted by the spill — meaning there’s evidence to show that the oil sank deeper than previously thought.

That’s bad for corals themselves, but Fisher said the discovery was more important because coral health can indicate the health of that whole area of the ocean. The deep ocean is mysterious and hard to study, and Fisher said it would be very difficult to know exactly what the effects of oil reaching the deep sea will be. Related: The Inconvenient Truth About A Green Revolution

“What we still don’t know, and what we need to all keep in mind, is that there’s the potential for sub-acute impact,” he said. “In other words, things that might have happened to the corals’ reproductive system — slower acting cancers, changes in the fitness of the animal. These are very hard to detect and they’ll take a long time for us to see what’s going on.”

Whether safety standards can really prevent another disaster

New federal regulations on drilling announced over the last few months aim to reduce the risk of future disasters like Deepwater Horizon. And last week, the Obama administration announced proposed regulations that target the reliability of drilling equipment in offshore drilling operations, requiring oil and gas companies to perform tests and maintenance on their blowout preventers, a key piece of drilling equipment.

But some environmental groups say that these new rules are similar to best practices that the industry already has in place, so they don’t go very far in preventing another spill. They also assert that new technologies cannot always account for human error, which have been the underlying causes of other major spills.

The risk of another spill is particularly troubling in the Arctic, a region which, as it melts, has been targeted for drilling by oil and gas companies. In February, the Interior Department proposed its first regulations for oil and gas development in the Arctic Ocean.

But even with new regulations, many are worried about the risks of spills.

“No safety regulations will fix the fact that only 25 percent of the spilled oil from Deepwater Horizon was recovered, burned, or chemically dispersed, leaving 75 percent unaccounted for,” Friends of the Earth said in a statement in March. “The lesson the Obama administration should have learned from Deepwater Horizon is that that only way to keep oil out of our environment is to keep it in the ground.”

By Katie Valentine & Emily Atkin for ThinkProgress

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • James on February 18 2016 said:
    This was kind of fun for me and my classmates

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News