• 6 minutes Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 17 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 23 minutes Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 21 hours Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 1 day Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 19 hours Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 20 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 1 day Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 2 days Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 2 days The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 1 day Pakistan: "Heart" Of Terrorism and Global Threat
  • 1 day Are Trump's steel tariffs working? Seems they are!
  • 2 days Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
  • 2 hours Hey Oil Bulls - How Long Till Increasing Oil Prices and Strengthening Dollar Start Killing Demand in Developing Countries?
  • 13 hours Why hydrogen economics does not work
  • 12 hours China goes against US natural gas
Alt Text

BP To Take Final Hit On 2010 Disaster

British Petroleum is set to…

MINING.com

MINING.com

MINING.com is a web-based global mining publication focusing on news and commentary about mining and mineral exploration. The site is a one-stop-shop for mining industry…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Economic Benefits From Oil Spills? Canadian Company Thinks So

Economic Benefits From Oil Spills? Canadian Company Thinks So

Kinder Morgan’s (NYSE:KMI) assertion that oil spills could bring economic benefits is triggering heated reactions.

The company’s statement, part of its $5.4 billion proposal to the federal government submitted Tuesday, also acknowledges a spill could have negative consequences for the environment and nearby communities. However, in the 15,000-page document, the company insists that a risk assessment and 60-year history operating the existing pipeline has shown “the probability of a large pipeline spill is low.”

Sierra Club campaigns director Caitlyn Vernon, said in a statement that Kinder’s view on oil spill is “an outrageous insult” to British Columbians.

"While marketing professionals might find lucrative work trying to rebrand an oil-drenched B.C. coast, a spill would put at risk more than 200,000 jobs in the lower mainland that depend on our clean, beautiful environment."

She added that with such a statement, Kinder Morgan has acknowledged that oil spills happen.

But Kinder Morgan senior director of marine development Michael Davies told 24Hours the comments were part of a requirement for the application.

“No spill is acceptable to us and while we are required by the National Energy Board to explore both the positive and negative socio-economic effects of a spill, it in no way means we accept the inevitability of a spill, nor justify one,” he was quoted as saying.

If approved, the expansion project will nearly triple the capacity of the 1,147 km Trans Mountain pipeline from 300,000 barrels per day to 890,000 barrels per day. To accommodate the increased oil, Kinder Morgan is proposing to build a new pipeline from Edmonton, Alberta, to the Burrard Inlet in Burnaby, B.C., create new and modified facilities and add three berths at the Westridge Marine Terminal in Burnaby. The pipeline carries a variety of hydrocarbon products including diluted bitumen from the Alberta oil sands.

Excerpts from the company’s application to the National Energy Board for expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline were published Wednesday by Press Progress.

By. Cecilia Jamasmie of Mining.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News