• 4 minutes China 2019 - Orwell was 35 years out
  • 7 minutes Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 11 minutes Trump will capitulate on the trade war
  • 14 minutes Glory to Hong Kong
  • 14 hours PETROLEUM for humanity 
  • 7 mins China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 15 hours Why don't the other GOP candidates get mention?
  • 15 hours Disenfranchised people are angry people - map of global electoral systems
  • 5 hours Yesterday Angela Merkel stopped Trump technology war on China – the moral of the story is do not eavesdrop on ladies with high ethical standards
  • 14 hours Brexit agreement
  • 32 mins ABC of Brexit, economy wise, where to find sites, links to articles ?
  • 14 hours Bloomberg: shale slowing. Third wave of shale coming.
  • 58 mins Erdogan Holds All The Cards ... 3.6 Million Of Them
  • 20 hours Spain Is On The Edge...Clashes Between Catalonia And "Madrid"
  • 22 hours Philadelphia Energy Solutions seeks to permanently shut oil refinery - sources
  • 21 hours 5 Tweets That Change The World?
  • 13 mins KURDS LEFT HIGH AND DRY TO DIE?

Breaking News:

World’s Largest IPO Delayed Once Again

Alt Text

The Oil Eating Bacteria That Can Clean Up Crude Spills

Scientists have discovered a rod-shaped…

Alt Text

Chinese Scientists Find New Way To Clean Up Oil Spills

Chinese scientists have invented a…

Alt Text

BP To Take Final Hit On 2010 Disaster

British Petroleum is set to…

Jen Alic

Jen Alic

 

More Info

Premium Content

Canada Sends Billion-Dollar Message to Oil Industry

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper may be about to get tough on offshore oil developers and pipeline companies with legislation that could make them liable for billions of dollars in the event of an accident.

The rumor is that Harper’s cabinet is pouring over some major legislation that would go a long way to appease environmentalists who view the country’s laws governing the sector as far too lenient.

Speaking to Canadian media, Environment Minister Peter Kent went on record both to describe the potential new legislation as “significant” and that the current legislation essentially requires taxpayers to foot the bill for accidents that should be the responsibility of the oil and gas industry.

Here’s what the current legislation looks like:

• Offshore drilling companies have to pay a maximum of $40 million for cleanup in the event of a spill in the country’s north (assuming negligence is not proven)

• The maximum they have to pay in the rest of the country is $30 million

The problem with this, say critics, is that such clean-ups tend to cost much more than this, leaving the taxpayers to make up the rest.

The alleged legislation comes amid intensifying protests against major pipeline operator Enbridge (NYSE: ENB). Weeks of protests in Vancouver have coincided with hearings over Enbridge’s $5-billion Northern Gateway pipeline.

The Northern Gateway pipeline would deliver diluted bitumen from the Alberta oilsands to a tanker port in Kitimat, British Columbia.

A federal joint review panel was established to assess the environmental impact of the project, while hearings took place in Vancouver, Victoria, Prince George, Prince Rupert and Edmonton. Final results of the hearings will be revealed by the end of this year.

Amid these hearings, one would question whether vague news of “significant” legislative changes being reviewed is timed to appease protesters over Enbridge.

What environmentalists want is unlimited liability for oil spills and harmful leaks. The argument is that spills can never be entirely cleaned up. They will not get unlimited liability.

It all comes down to economics and environment—and never the two shall meet. Or shall they? There is one potential savior here: pipeline safety technology first inspired in space and now available—and more importantly—affordable. The latest in remote sensory leak detection systems could be the one thing that can mobilize both sides of this growing divide to reach consensus. It’s not the future. In fact, it is already commercially viable and it may be the big pipeline operators’ only way out of protests that will not go away any time soon.

But there is something the environmentalists should also consider: The new plans for pipelines, whether it be Enbridge’s Northern Gateway or the equally beleaguered Keystone XL, courtesy of TransCanada (NYSE: TRP), should perhaps not be the key targets of everyone’s safety concerns.

Pipelines have only recently become a major topic of dispute, so the focus is on the new pipelines, when the real threat is the older pipelines.

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Chad Cleveringa on February 04 2013 said:
    I think it is fine that oil companys are held responsible for there actions. The country has been on the virg depression and big oil is having record sales . The promblem with the economy is the high cost of living . Fuel is a big part of that. Secondly why is the USA buying Iraq oil Canada has plenty and it dosnt cost us billions in tax payer dollars and lives.
  • NetCentric on February 04 2013 said:
    This is not a "get tough" message to the oil industry but rather an invitation. A maximum means they will never have to pay anything more than "slap on the wrist" money. Oil companies earn this much money over a lunch break.

    The BP fine four billion dollars is about equal to the revenue BP made every four days last year.

    A $40 million cap is an incentive.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play