• 3 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 7 minutes "Leaked" request by some Democrats that they were asking Nancy to coordinate censure instead of impeachment.
  • 12 minutes Trump's China Strategy: Death By a Thousand Paper Cuts
  • 16 minutes Global Debt Worries. How Will This End?
  • 11 hours americavchina.com
  • 3 mins Greta named Time Magazine "Person of the Year"
  • 2 hours DUMB IT DOWN-IMPEACHMENT
  • 2 hours Emissions Soar as Flaring Frenzy Breaks New Records
  • 14 hours Tories on course to win majority
  • 15 hours Winter Storms Hitting Continental US
  • 7 hours Aramco Raises $25.6B in World's Biggest IPO
  • 18 hours 2nd Annual Great Oil Price Prediction Challenge of 2019
  • 1 hour POTUS Trump signs the HK Bill
  • 14 hours WTO is effectively neutered. Trump *already* won the trade war against China and WTO is helpless to intervene
Alt Text

The Oil Eating Bacteria That Can Clean Up Crude Spills

Scientists have discovered a rod-shaped…

Alt Text

Chinese Scientists Find New Way To Clean Up Oil Spills

Chinese scientists have invented a…

Alt Text

BP To Take Final Hit On 2010 Disaster

British Petroleum is set to…

Jen Alic

Jen Alic

 

More Info

Premium Content

Canada Sends Billion-Dollar Message to Oil Industry

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper may be about to get tough on offshore oil developers and pipeline companies with legislation that could make them liable for billions of dollars in the event of an accident.

The rumor is that Harper’s cabinet is pouring over some major legislation that would go a long way to appease environmentalists who view the country’s laws governing the sector as far too lenient.

Speaking to Canadian media, Environment Minister Peter Kent went on record both to describe the potential new legislation as “significant” and that the current legislation essentially requires taxpayers to foot the bill for accidents that should be the responsibility of the oil and gas industry.

Here’s what the current legislation looks like:

• Offshore drilling companies have to pay a maximum of $40 million for cleanup in the event of a spill in the country’s north (assuming negligence is not proven)

• The maximum they have to pay in the rest of the country is $30 million

The problem with this, say critics, is that such clean-ups tend to cost much more than this, leaving the taxpayers to make up the rest.

The alleged legislation comes amid intensifying protests against major pipeline operator Enbridge (NYSE: ENB). Weeks of protests in Vancouver have coincided with hearings over Enbridge’s $5-billion Northern Gateway pipeline.

The Northern Gateway pipeline would deliver diluted bitumen from the Alberta oilsands to a tanker port in Kitimat, British Columbia.

A federal joint review panel was established to assess the environmental impact of the project, while hearings took place in Vancouver, Victoria, Prince George, Prince Rupert and Edmonton. Final results of the hearings will be revealed by the end of this year.

Amid these hearings, one would question whether vague news of “significant” legislative changes being reviewed is timed to appease protesters over Enbridge.

What environmentalists want is unlimited liability for oil spills and harmful leaks. The argument is that spills can never be entirely cleaned up. They will not get unlimited liability.

It all comes down to economics and environment—and never the two shall meet. Or shall they? There is one potential savior here: pipeline safety technology first inspired in space and now available—and more importantly—affordable. The latest in remote sensory leak detection systems could be the one thing that can mobilize both sides of this growing divide to reach consensus. It’s not the future. In fact, it is already commercially viable and it may be the big pipeline operators’ only way out of protests that will not go away any time soon.

But there is something the environmentalists should also consider: The new plans for pipelines, whether it be Enbridge’s Northern Gateway or the equally beleaguered Keystone XL, courtesy of TransCanada (NYSE: TRP), should perhaps not be the key targets of everyone’s safety concerns.

Pipelines have only recently become a major topic of dispute, so the focus is on the new pipelines, when the real threat is the older pipelines.

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Chad Cleveringa on February 04 2013 said:
    I think it is fine that oil companys are held responsible for there actions. The country has been on the virg depression and big oil is having record sales . The promblem with the economy is the high cost of living . Fuel is a big part of that. Secondly why is the USA buying Iraq oil Canada has plenty and it dosnt cost us billions in tax payer dollars and lives.
  • NetCentric on February 04 2013 said:
    This is not a "get tough" message to the oil industry but rather an invitation. A maximum means they will never have to pay anything more than "slap on the wrist" money. Oil companies earn this much money over a lunch break.

    The BP fine four billion dollars is about equal to the revenue BP made every four days last year.

    A $40 million cap is an incentive.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play