• 5 hours Tesla Is “Headed For A Brick Wall”
  • 10 hours Norwegian Pension Fund Set to Divest From Oil Sands and Coal Ventures
  • 14 hours IEA: “2018 Might Not Be Quite So Happy For OPEC Producers”
  • 15 hours Goldman Bullish On Oil Markets
  • 17 hours OPEC Member Nigeria To Issue Africa’s First Sovereign Green Bond
  • 19 hours Nigeria To Spend $1B Of Oil Money Fighting Boko Haram
  • 21 hours Syria Aims To Begin Offshore Gas Exploration In 2019
  • 23 hours Australian Watchdog Blocks BP Fuel Station Acquisition
  • 1 day Colombia Boosts Oil & Gas Investment
  • 1 day Environmentalists Rev Up Anti-Keystone XL Angst Amongst Landowners
  • 2 days Venezuelan Default Swap Bonds At 19.25 Cents On The Dollar
  • 2 days Aramco On The Hunt For IPO Global Coordinators
  • 2 days ADNOC Distribution Jumps 16% At Market Debut In UAE
  • 2 days India Feels the Pinch As Oil Prices Rise
  • 2 days Aramco Announces $40 Billion Investment Program
  • 2 days Top Insurer Axa To Exit Oil Sands
  • 3 days API Reports Huge Crude Draw
  • 3 days Venezuela “Can’t Even Write A Check For $21.5M Dollars.”
  • 3 days EIA Lowers 2018 Oil Demand Growth Estimates By 40,000 Bpd
  • 3 days Trump Set To Open Atlantic Coast To Oil, Gas Drilling
  • 3 days Norway’s Oil And Gas Investment To Drop For Fourth Consecutive Year
  • 3 days Saudis Plan To Hike Gasoline Prices By 80% In January
  • 3 days Exxon To Start Reporting On Climate Change Effect
  • 3 days US Geological Survey To Reevaluate Bakken Oil Reserves
  • 4 days Brazil Cuts Local Content Requirements to Attract Oil Investors
  • 4 days Forties Pipeline Could Remain Shuttered For Weeks
  • 4 days Desjardins Ends Energy Loan Moratorium
  • 4 days ADNOC Distribution IPO Valuation Could Be Lesson For Aramco
  • 4 days Russia May Turn To Cryptocurrencies For Oil Trade
  • 4 days Iraq-Iran Oil Swap Deal To Run For 1 Year
  • 6 days Venezuelan Crude Exports To U.S. Fall To 15-year Lows
  • 7 days Mexico Blames Brazil For Failing Auction
  • 7 days Norway Allows Eni To Restart Goliat Oil Field In Barents Sea
  • 7 days Malaysia Suggests Muslim Countries Stop Trading Oil In U.S. Dollars
  • 7 days Kinder Morgan Wins Appeal To Start Trans Mountain Work
  • 7 days Mexico Cancels Deepwater JV Tender Due To Lack Of Interest
  • 7 days Oil Drillers Give Cold Shoulder To Alaska Bidding Round
  • 7 days Budweiser Bets On Tesla To Replace Its Fleet
  • 8 days Forties Pipeline And Nearby Terminal Disrupted After Oil Leak
  • 8 days Major Nigerian Union Threatens Strike After Mass Firing Of New Members

Breaking News:

Tesla Is “Headed For A Brick Wall”

Bacteria Consumed Over 200,000 Tons of Oil from Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

Bacteria Consumed Over 200,000 Tons of Oil from Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

Over a period of five months following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, bacteria consumed at least 200,000 tons of oil and natural gas that spewed into the Gulf of Mexico.

For a study published this week in Environmental Science and Technology, researchers analysed an extensive data set to determine not only how much oil and gas was eaten by bacteria, but also how the characteristics of the feast changed with time.

“A significant amount of the oil and gas that was released was retained within the ocean water more than one-half mile below the sea surface, says co-author John Kessler, associate professor of earth and environmental sciences at the University of Rochester. “It appears that the hydrocarbon-eating bacteria did a good job of removing the majority of the material that was retained in these layers.”

The findings include the first measurements of how the rate at which the bacteria ate the oil and gas changed as the disaster progressed—information that is fundamental to understanding both this spill and predicting the behaviour of future ones.

“Interestingly, the oil and gas consumption rate was correlated with the addition of dispersants at the wellhead,” Kessler says. “While there is still much to learn about the appropriateness of using dispersants in a natural ecosystem, our results suggest it made the released hydrocarbons more available to the native Gulf of Mexico microorganisms.”

Measurements show that the consumption of the oil and gas by bacteria in the deep Gulf had stopped by September 2010, five months after the Deepwater Horizon explosion.

“It is unclear if this indicates that this great feast was over by this time or if the microorganisms were simply taking a break before they start on dessert and coffee,” Kessler says.

“Our results suggest that some (about 40 percent) of the released hydrocarbons that once populated these layers still remained in the Gulf post September 2010, so food was available for the feast to continue at some later time.  But the location of those substances and whether they were biochemically transformed is unknown.”

Previous studies of the Deepwater Horizon spill had shown that the oil and gas were trapped in underwater layers, or “plumes,” and that the bacteria had begun consuming the oil and gas. The researchers were able to measure just how many tons of hydrocarbons released from the spill had been removed in the deep Gulf waters. The team’s research suggests that the majority of what once composed these large underwater plumes of oil and gas was eaten by the bacteria.

Kessler worked with graduate research assistant Mengran Du at Texas A&M University to analyse more than 1,300 profiles of oxygen dissolved in the Gulf of Mexico water spanning a period of four months and covering nearly 30,000 square miles.

The researchers calculated how many tons of oil and gas had been consumed and at what rate by first measuring how much oxygen had been removed from the ocean.

“When bacteria consume oil and gas, they use up oxygen and release carbon dioxide, just as humans do when we breathe,” Du says. “When bacteria die and decompose, that uses up still more oxygen. Both these processes remove oxygen from the water.”

It is this lower oxygen level that the researchers could measure and use as an indicator of how much oil and gas had been removed by microorganisms and at what rate.

The work was supported by the National Science Foundation with additional contributions from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Sloan Foundation, BP/the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative, and the Chinese Scholarship Council.

By. Leonor Sierra-Rochester




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Hans Nieder on September 14 2012 said:
    Fabulous read, Futurity! Thank you.
  • Malcolm Holley on September 14 2012 said:
    This should drive the environmental wackos crazy. There are thousands of naturally occuring hydrocarbon seeps throughout the Gulf, and as a result there are many species that have evolved to to take advantage of this energy source. We can all agree that oil spills are not something to embrace, however it is nice to see that nature has been hard at work cleaning up these incidents.
  • LILIAN on February 12 2013 said:
    What about other categories of micro organisms like the fungi group, i think they also have capacities for oil degradation, especially the Actinomycetes.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News