• 5 minutes Is Pete Buttigieg emerging as the most likely challenger to Trump?
  • 7 minutes Can LNG Kill Oil?
  • 8 minutes Question: Why are oil futures so low through 2020?
  • 11 minutes US Shale: Technology
  • 9 hours “The era of cheap & abundant energy is long gone. Money supply & debt have grown faster than real economy. Debt saturation is now a real risk, requiring a global scale reset.”"We are now in new era of expensive unconventional energy
  • 3 hours CoV-19: China, WHO, myth vs fact
  • 3 hours Don't sneeze. Coronavirus is a threat to oil markets and global economies
  • 13 hours Blowout videos
  • 4 hours Has Trump put the USA at the service of Israel?
  • 18 hours Democrats Plan "B" Bloomberg Implodes. Plan "C" = John Kerry ?
  • 3 hours Oil Stocks
  • 2 days Question - What if there are no buyers for Chevron's Appalachia Assets?
  • 2 hours Foxconn cancelled the reopening of their mfg plants scheduled for tomorrow. Rescheduled to March 3rd. . . . if they're lucky.
  • 2 days Natural Gas
  • 2 days Cheap natural gas is making it very hard to go green
  • 2 days Energy from thin air?
Alt Text

Debunking The Top 5 Environmental Disaster Films

Hollywood isn’t exactly known for…

Alt Text

Is Eating Meat Worse Than Burning Oil?

The fight against climate change…

David Gabel

David Gabel

David is a writer at Environmental News Network

More Info

Premium Content

The Paradox Faced by Environmentalists

The signs are all around. Many places in the world show degradation of the air, water, and soil. Species becoming extinct as natural habitats are being destroyed. The emissions of greenhouse gases that can alter the planet's climate are unacceptable. All the environmental issues put together amount to a very serious threat to human welfare. Yet at the same time, all accepted measures of well-being show that, on average, quality of life is improving around the globe. How does an environmentalist call society into action under such conditions?

A team of researchers examine this issue of the "environmentalist's paradox" in the latest issue of the journal, BioScience. They confirm that improvements in overall well-being are real, despite overwhelming evidence of ecosystem decline. The aggregate complacency that is occurring can be attributed to three main culprits.

- Increases in food production
- Technological innovations that decouple people from ecosystems
- Time lags before well-being is affected

The team of authors, led by Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne, agrees with the influential Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, which rates the capacity for ecosystem services for human purposes as low. They also agree with the Human Development Index (measures income, life-expectancy, and literacy), which shows significant improvements in the last forty years.

Unfortunately, the authors find little reassurance for a continued rise in aggregate well-being in the coming years. The observed effects to the environment threaten new gains in agricultural production. These threats can come in the form of wild temperature swings as well as an increased prevalence of floods and droughts. Technological advances can provide only a limited buffer in this regard. There is mixed evidence that society will be able to successfully adapt to further environmental degradation.

The team argues against complacency by pointing out what they call "ecosystem brittleness." They urge a greater understanding by researchers and decision makers, of the actual benefits of healthy ecosystems to human welfare. In the end, understanding this environmentalist's paradox is crucial to guiding future management of nature's services.

By. David Gabel

Source: Environmental News Network




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage




Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News