• 4 minutes China 2019 - Orwell was 35 years out
  • 7 minutes Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 11 minutes Trump will capitulate on the trade war
  • 14 minutes Glory to Hong Kong
  • 8 mins Yesterday Angela Merkel stopped Trump technology war on China – the moral of the story is do not eavesdrop on ladies with high ethical standards
  • 3 hours China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 7 hours IMO 2020:
  • 9 hours World Stocks Drop And Futures Tread Water After China Reports Worst GDP Growth In 30 Years
  • 16 mins The Ultimate Heresy: Technology Can't Fix What's Broken
  • 2 hours Brexit agreement
  • 17 hours National Geographic Warns Billions Face Shortages Of Food And Clean Water Over Next 30 Years
  • 17 hours ABC of Brexit, economy wise, where to find sites, links to articles ?
  • 14 hours Why did Aramco Delay IPO again ? It's Not Always What It Seems.
  • 10 hours Deepwater GOM Project Claims Industry First
  • 17 hours Idiotic Environmental Predictions
  • 17 hours Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden, Ukraine Oil & Gas exploration company Burisma, and 2020 U.S. election shenanigans
Alt Text

Greta Thunberg’s Not-So-Little Carbon Footprint

Greta Thunberg has captured the…

Alt Text

Debunking The Top 5 Environmental Disaster Films

Hollywood isn’t exactly known for…

David Gabel

David Gabel

David is a writer at Environmental News Network

More Info

Premium Content

The Paradox Faced by Environmentalists

The signs are all around. Many places in the world show degradation of the air, water, and soil. Species becoming extinct as natural habitats are being destroyed. The emissions of greenhouse gases that can alter the planet's climate are unacceptable. All the environmental issues put together amount to a very serious threat to human welfare. Yet at the same time, all accepted measures of well-being show that, on average, quality of life is improving around the globe. How does an environmentalist call society into action under such conditions?

A team of researchers examine this issue of the "environmentalist's paradox" in the latest issue of the journal, BioScience. They confirm that improvements in overall well-being are real, despite overwhelming evidence of ecosystem decline. The aggregate complacency that is occurring can be attributed to three main culprits.

- Increases in food production
- Technological innovations that decouple people from ecosystems
- Time lags before well-being is affected

The team of authors, led by Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne, agrees with the influential Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, which rates the capacity for ecosystem services for human purposes as low. They also agree with the Human Development Index (measures income, life-expectancy, and literacy), which shows significant improvements in the last forty years.

Unfortunately, the authors find little reassurance for a continued rise in aggregate well-being in the coming years. The observed effects to the environment threaten new gains in agricultural production. These threats can come in the form of wild temperature swings as well as an increased prevalence of floods and droughts. Technological advances can provide only a limited buffer in this regard. There is mixed evidence that society will be able to successfully adapt to further environmental degradation.

The team argues against complacency by pointing out what they call "ecosystem brittleness." They urge a greater understanding by researchers and decision makers, of the actual benefits of healthy ecosystems to human welfare. In the end, understanding this environmentalist's paradox is crucial to guiding future management of nature's services.

By. David Gabel

Source: Environmental News Network




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play