• 4 minutes Tariffs to derail $83.7 Billion Chinese Investment in West Virginia
  • 9 minutes Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 17 minutes Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 1 hour Saudi Arabia turns to solar
  • 17 hours Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 54 mins Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 11 hours Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 6 hours Corruption On The Top: Netanyahu's Wife Charged With Misuse of Public Funds for Meals
  • 2 hours Russia's Energy Minister says Oil Prices Balanced at $75, so Wants to Increase OPEC + Russia Oil by 1.5 mbpd
  • 12 hours Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 8 hours U.S. Withdraws From U.N. Human Rights Council
  • 1 hour Saudi Arabia plans to physically cut off Qatar by moat, nuclear waste and military base
  • 16 hours China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
  • 12 hours OPEC Meeting Could End Without Decision - Irony Note Added from OPEC Children's Book
  • 10 hours "The Gasoline Car Is a Car With a Future"
  • 10 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 23 hours EVs Could Help Coal Demand
  • 5 hours EU Confirms Trade Retaliation Measures vs. U.S. To Take Effect on June 22
  • 1 day Tariffs to derail $83.7 Billion Chinese Investment in West Virginia

Breaking News:

Saudi Aramco Clears Another IPO Hurdle

Alt Text

Did This Startup Solve The Carbon Capture Challenge?

Costs have long prohibited carbon…

Alt Text

Oil Majors See Profit In Carbon Capture And Storage

carbon capture and storage technology…

Alt Text

Europe’s Toxic Radiation Cloud Remains A Mystery

Last month’s mysterious radiation cloud…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

EPA Cracking Down On U.S. Methane Waste

EPA Cracking Down On U.S. Methane Waste

On August 18 the U.S. EPA announced new regulations to control methane emissions from oil and gas sites.

The EPA has already proposed limits on carbon emissions from power plants. The latest rules are also an effort to reduce heat-trapping gases as part of the Obama administration’s campaign to address climate change. The first-ever regulations released on Monday will aim to reduce methane emissions – a potent greenhouse gas – by 40 to 45 percent below 2012 levels by 2025. Related: Oil Markets Coming To Grips With Prices Remaining “Lower for Longer”

Over a short period of time, methane is actually a lot more potent than carbon dioxide in terms of its warming effect. That means slashing methane emissions is critical to achieving climate goals.

Methane is accidently released up and down the oil and gas drilling supply chain – at the well head but also along pipelines and processing facilities. EPA’s regulations will require the industry to cut down on emissions at drilling sites and in transmission infrastructure. Companies will also have to monitor emissions levels. Related: A Bargain In Oilfield Services Right Now

Although the oil and gas industry opposes the move (and environmental groups welcome it) the technology to cut down on methane emissions appears relatively straightforward and compliance with EPA’s rules should not be too difficult.

One caveat to the new rules is that they only apply to new sources of methane, not existing ones. Existing sources of methane can participate under a voluntary program but are not required to slash methane. Related: The “Thin Green Line” Holding Back U.S. Energy Exports

Separately, a new study finds that a vast majority of methane is emitted from natural gas gathering facilities that connect natural gas from drill sites to their ultimate destination. The study, published in Environmental Science and Technology and sponsored by the Environmental Defense Fund, found that natural gas gathering facilities emit 100 billion cubic meters of natural gas per year, or eight times more gas than the EPA has estimated. The emitted gas could heat 3.2 million American homes each year.

The EPA does not have plans to regulate these existing sources of methane for the time being, as doing so would be much more complicated and costly for the industry. But leaving a massive source of methane unregulated means that the ability for the U.S. to achieve certain emissions targets over the long-term is questionable.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News