• 4 minutes Nord Stream 2 Halt Possible Over Navalny Poisoning
  • 8 minutes America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 11 minutes JP Morgan says investors should prepare for rising odds of Trump win
  • 24 hours Daniel Yergin Book is a Reality Check on Energy
  • 2 days Permian in for Prosperous and Bright Future
  • 1 day Famine, Economic Collapse of China on the Horizon?
  • 1 day Oil giants partner with environmental group to track Permian Basin's methane emissions
  • 1 hour US after 4 more years of Trump?
  • 2 days Gepthermal fracking: how to confuse a greenie
  • 2 days YPF to redeploy rigs in Vaca Muerta on export potential
  • 2 days Top HHS official takes leave of absence after Facebook rant about CDC conspiracies
  • 29 mins Why NG falling n crude up?
  • 3 hours Something wicked this way comes
  • 1 hour The Perfect Solution To Remove Conflict Problems In The South China East Asia Sea
  • 24 hours Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations
  • 3 days Surviving without coal is a challenge!!
Big Oil Hit Hard By Supreme Court Rejection

Big Oil Hit Hard By Supreme Court Rejection

The U.S. Supreme Court has…

What To Expect From The European Green New Deal

What To Expect From The European Green New Deal

The European Commission is set…

Is Eating Meat Worse Than Burning Oil?

Is Eating Meat Worse Than Burning Oil?

The fight against climate change…

Environmental Finance

Environmental Finance

Environmental Finance is still the only independent global magazine offering comprehensive coverage of the financial impact of environmental issues on the business community.  Leading industry…

More Info

Premium Content

Bank of America to Invest $50 Billion to Address Climate Change

Bank of America has announced it will direct $50 billion to address climate change over the next ten years, but it was slammed by an NGO for not addressing its financing of coal businesses.

The bank’s new goal will be effective from 2013, as its previous $20 billion target, set in 2007, will be met by the end of this year, four years early.

Its environmental business initiative will consist primarily of lending, equipment finance, capital markets, advisory services, carbon finance, and advice and investment solutions for clients.

The areas of focus include energy efficiency, renewable energy and infrastructure, low-carbon transportation and water and waste.

The bank also announced a goal to provide $100 million in grants and programme-related investments to non-profit organisations, community development financial institutions and other NGOs involved with low-carbon technologies and forestry.

But the bank did not address its role in financing fossil fuels, said San Francisco-based NGO Rainforest Action Network (RAN), which added that its financing initiative for renewables is not enough to reduce emissions and protect the planet.

“Bank of America’s commitment to renewable energy is a step in the right direction. However, the bank is simultaneously taking two steps back by continuing to underwrite the coal industry,” said Amanda Starbuck, director of RAN’s energy and finance programme.

“Coal is the elephant in Bank of America’s environmental commitments. Between 2010 and 2011, Bank of America provided $6.4 billion in underwriting for US coal,” she added.

The bank is one of the signatories of the Carbon Principles, launched in 2008 to evaluate and address carbon risks involved with financing coal-fired power projects in the US and encourage clients to pursue low-carbon alternatives.

Bank of America last year set a target to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by more than 30% by 2015, compared with a 2004 baseline, and yesterday announced new internal measures to meet the 2015 target.

“Meeting these aggressive, industry-leading goals requires new ways of working across our company,” said Cathy Bessant, global technology and operations executive and chair of Bank of America’s environmental council. “We have a strong culture of environmental sustainability,” she added.

Last month, US bank Goldman Sachs announced a target to make $40 billion of renewable energy investments or financings over the next ten years – also a target attacked by NGOs in the context of a lack of transparency over its fossil fuels financing.

By. Elza Holmstedt Pell

Source: Environmental Finance


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Daryl on June 13 2012 said:
    Unbelievable. I have had a personal bank account through BofA going back almost 20 years and have had my business accounts there as well for over 10 years. And as soon as I get home from this trip I will be starting the process of finding another home for my business.

    I am very disappointed in BofA, falling in line with the scam of the Green crowd. Let alone the fact that we bailed them out to the tune of $45B not too long ago. These are not the kind of people that I wish to support.
  • suneel Kumar.R on June 13 2012 said:
    we are running a NGO in the state of Andhra pradesh, India and have been engaged in promotion of community based climate adaptation and mitigation technologies and projects in our operational area. This article is very much useful and impressive. May i have the further information regarding the mobilisation of climate change finance to sustain our climate change related interventions in our operational area. looking forward for your further infomation.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News