• 1 day Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 1 day Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 1 day Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 1 day $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 1 day Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 1 day Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 2 days Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 2 days Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 2 days Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 2 days Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 2 days Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 2 days Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 3 days Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 3 days Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 3 days U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 3 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 3 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
  • 3 days Russian Hackers Target British Energy Industry
  • 3 days Venezuela Signs $3.15B Debt Restructuring Deal With Russia
  • 3 days DOJ: Protestors Interfering With Pipeline Construction Will Be Prosecuted
  • 3 days Lower Oil Prices Benefit European Refiners
  • 4 days World’s Biggest Private Equity Firm Raises $1 Billion To Invest In Oil
  • 4 days Oil Prices Tank After API Reports Strong Build In Crude Inventories
  • 4 days Iraq Oil Revenue Not Enough For Sustainable Development
  • 4 days Sudan In Talks With Foreign Oil Firms To Boost Crude Production
  • 4 days Shell: Four Oil Platforms Shut In Gulf Of Mexico After Fire
  • 4 days OPEC To Recruit New Members To Fight Market Imbalance
  • 5 days Green Groups Want Norway’s Arctic Oil Drilling Licenses Canceled
  • 5 days Venezuelan Oil Output Drops To Lowest In 28 Years
  • 5 days Shale Production Rises By 80,000 BPD In Latest EIA Forecasts
  • 5 days GE Considers Selling Baker Hughes Assets
  • 5 days Eni To Address Barents Sea Regulatory Breaches By Dec 11
  • 5 days Saudi Aramco To Invest $300 Billion In Upstream Projects
  • 5 days Aramco To List Shares In Hong Kong ‘For Sure’
  • 5 days BP CEO Sees Venezuela As Oil’s Wildcard
  • 6 days Iran Denies Involvement In Bahrain Oil Pipeline Blast
  • 8 days The Oil Rig Drilling 10 Miles Under The Sea
  • 8 days Baghdad Agrees To Ship Kirkuk Oil To Iran
  • 8 days Another Group Joins Niger Delta Avengers’ Ceasefire Boycott
  • 8 days Italy Looks To Phase Out Coal-Fired Electricity By 2025
Alt Text

How Long Will The Lithium Rush Last?

As the race to secure…

Alt Text

Don’t Expect Palladium Prices To Plunge

Palladium has recently soared to…

Why Is Rio Tinto Giving Diamonds Away For Free?

Bunder Diamonds

It’s not often that quality mining assets come up for sale. And it’s even rarer they’re given away for free.

But news this week suggests that’s exactly what’s happening in one of the world’s emerging diamond hotspots.

India.

Indian government officials said Tuesday that Rio Tinto is about to make an unprecedented move with its Bunder diamond deposit. And hand the major project back to the government at no cost.

Mines Secretary Balvinder Kumar told Reuters that Rio Tinto has decided to pull out of Bunder completely. With the major miner electing to return the project to the government, rather than pursue other options for the project.

The move is surprising in the utmost. Given that Rio Tinto says it has spent a full $90 million exploring and delineating a diamond deposit at Bunder over the past 14 years.

That work has been reasonably successful. Defining a diamond resource at Bunder that runs some 34.2 million carats — putting the deposit on par with some of the world’s top mines.

And yet Rio Tinto is now walking away. Not selling, not joint venturing, not starting a strategic review.

Which leads to the question: why?

Related: Why Wall Street Is Throwing Billions At The Permian

Part of the answer may lie in the politics of developing a mine in India. After all, the fact that the Bunder project has now been running for 14 years speaks to the slow pace of work in this part of the world.

And government officials themselves pointed out this week that the project is located in a forest area important to tigers and other wildlife. Meaning that environmental concerns could be playing a part in Rio’s decision to exit the project.

All of which seems to strike a cautionary tone for large-scale mining in India. Watch to see what the next steps are for the project — with officials saying they will now seek to auction the property, or allocate it to an Indian state mining company. A bid from a foreign miner would be a reassuring vote of confidence here.

Here’s to giving it away now.

By Dave Forest

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

 




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Krishnan on January 07 2017 said:
    I was associated with the project since inception to 2012. I had predicted long back that Rio will never develop this project; main reason - the deposit was never considered a tier 1 project. They never pursued clearances in earnest and made some wierd applications too. Despite all this I believe the government had nearly finalised the clearances in 2015 but Rio was possibly not interested. I believe this was more a economic decision

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News