• 5 minutes Covid-19 logarithmic growth
  • 8 minutes Why Trump Is Right to Re-Open the Economy
  • 12 minutes Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 14 minutes China Takes Axe To Alternative Energy Funding, Slashing Subsidies For Solar And Wind
  • 3 hours Which producers will shut in first?
  • 6 hours The Most Annoying Person You Have Encountered During Lockdown
  • 3 hours Its going to be an oil bloodbath
  • 22 hours We are witnesses to the end of the petroleum age
  • 2 hours Russia's Rosneft Oil Company announces termination of its activity in Venezuela
  • 5 hours Saudi Aramco struggling to raise money for this year's dividend of $75 billion. Now trying to sell their pipelines for $10 billion.
  • 1 day Breaking News - Strategic Strikes on Chinese Troll Farms
  • 1 hour How to Create a Pandemic
  • 22 mins KSA taking Missiles from ?
  • 1 day >>The falling of the Persian Gulf oil empires is near <<
  • 4 hours Saudi Arabia Can't Endure $30 Oil For Long
  • 1 day A New Solar-Panel Plant Could Have Capacity to Meet Half of Global Demand
Alt Text

The End Of A Dark Decade For Energy Commodities

Commodities have suffered through a…

Alt Text

This Key Battery Metal Is Set To Soar By 250%

Copper prices surged to a…

Alt Text

Are We Really Facing A Battery Metal Shortage?

Electric car builder Tesla foresees…

Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Premium Content

Why Is Rio Tinto Giving Diamonds Away For Free?

It’s not often that quality mining assets come up for sale. And it’s even rarer they’re given away for free.

But news this week suggests that’s exactly what’s happening in one of the world’s emerging diamond hotspots.

India.

Indian government officials said Tuesday that Rio Tinto is about to make an unprecedented move with its Bunder diamond deposit. And hand the major project back to the government at no cost.

Mines Secretary Balvinder Kumar told Reuters that Rio Tinto has decided to pull out of Bunder completely. With the major miner electing to return the project to the government, rather than pursue other options for the project.

The move is surprising in the utmost. Given that Rio Tinto says it has spent a full $90 million exploring and delineating a diamond deposit at Bunder over the past 14 years.

That work has been reasonably successful. Defining a diamond resource at Bunder that runs some 34.2 million carats — putting the deposit on par with some of the world’s top mines.

And yet Rio Tinto is now walking away. Not selling, not joint venturing, not starting a strategic review.

Which leads to the question: why?

Related: Why Wall Street Is Throwing Billions At The Permian

Part of the answer may lie in the politics of developing a mine in India. After all, the fact that the Bunder project has now been running for 14 years speaks to the slow pace of work in this part of the world.

And government officials themselves pointed out this week that the project is located in a forest area important to tigers and other wildlife. Meaning that environmental concerns could be playing a part in Rio’s decision to exit the project.

All of which seems to strike a cautionary tone for large-scale mining in India. Watch to see what the next steps are for the project — with officials saying they will now seek to auction the property, or allocate it to an Indian state mining company. A bid from a foreign miner would be a reassuring vote of confidence here.

Here’s to giving it away now.

By Dave Forest

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

 


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage






Leave a comment
  • Krishnan on January 07 2017 said:
    I was associated with the project since inception to 2012. I had predicted long back that Rio will never develop this project; main reason - the deposit was never considered a tier 1 project. They never pursued clearances in earnest and made some wierd applications too. Despite all this I believe the government had nearly finalised the clearances in 2015 but Rio was possibly not interested. I believe this was more a economic decision

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News