• 4 days Nuclear Bomb = Nuclear War: Saudi Arabia Will Develop Nuclear Bomb If Iran Does
  • 3 days Statoil Changes Name
  • 4 days Tillerson just sacked ... how will market react?
  • 3 days Russian hackers targeted American energy grid
  • 3 days Is $71 As Good As It Gets For Oil Bulls This Year?
  • 4 days Petrobras Narrows 2017 Loss, Net Debt Falls Below $85bn
  • 4 days Proton battery-alternative for lithium?
  • 4 days Ford Recalls 1.38 Million Vehicles (North America) For Loose Steering Wheel Bolt
  • 3 days Oil Boom Will Help Ghana To Be One Of The Fastest Growing¨Economies By 2018!
  • 3 days Country With Biggest Oil Reserves Biggest Threat to World Economy
  • 4 days I vote for Exxon
  • 3 days HAPPY RIG COUNT DAY!!
  • 4 days UK vs. Russia - Britain Expels 23 Russian Diplomats Over Chemical Attack On Ex-Spy.
  • 4 days Why is gold soooo boring?
  • 4 days South Korea Would Suspend Five Coal - Fire Power Plants.
  • 3 days Spotify to file $1 billion IPO
Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Australia’s Super Profits Tax on Resource Companies Leads to Immediate Fall-Out

Australia sent the major miners into a tailspin overnight.

The Rudd government announced Sunday night that it will impose a new "resource super profits" tax on mining, oil and gas, geothermal and other resource extraction in the nation.

Under the scheme, resource companies will pay a 40% tax on profits. Implementation is scheduled for July 1, 2012.

The fall-out was immediate.

BHP announced it expects its effective tax rate to rise to 57%, from a current 43%. Citigroup said the new rules could cause the effective tax rate for northern Australia's large liquefied natural gas projects to rise by several percent.

Stocks were down nearly across the board.

A few observations:

One of the few "saving graces" of the new rules is that the tax is on profits. A company has to be making money in order to pay, and producers will pay in accordance with how much cash they're making.

This is better than a royalty scheme, of the kind other governments have tried. Royalties come off the top, whether a company is making a little money or a lot. This can kill marginal projects quickly.

But even under the proposed profits tax, marginal projects will suffer. Extra tax could push a borderline project into negative NPV territory. Low-grade, deep or engineering-challenged projects will likely see less investment.

One interesting aspect of the new rules is a tax break for exploration.

The government opted not to go with a flow-through tax program, which many in the mining community had been calling for.

Instead, they will grant a "resource exploration rebate". Whereby companies can write off approximately 30% of their exploration expenses against future revenue.
This will help major miners a little. The big guys have both exploration expenses and cash flow to write credits off against.

For smaller companies, the arrangement is more challenging. Most junior exploration companies have no cash flow. Essentially making the tax credit useless.

Some sub-groups of explorers could benefit. Geothermal explorers, for example, may be able to use the credits if they discover and develop a viable project through to production.

One outcome could be that juniors will become prized for their tax pools. We saw this in the Canadian oil and gas sector. Junior companies with tens of millions in tax losses are often acquired by larger producers largely for the tax benefit.

Bottom line: the new laws will be a test of the "world-class-ness" of Australia's resource assets. Projects that are stellar will still be worthwhile even with increased tax.

But any projects on the bubble could get the axe. Developers may simply have more profitable places to sink their money.

Time to separate the wheat from the chaff.

By. Dave Forest of Notela Resources

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News