• 4 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 11 minutes Energy Outlook for Renewables. Pie in the sky or real?
  • 11 hours Shale Oil will it self destruct?
  • 6 hours Berkeley becomes first U.S. city to ban natural gas in new homes
  • 1 hour Iran Captures British Tanker sailing through Straits of Hormuz
  • 1 hour Iran Loses $130,000,000 Oil Revenue Every Day They Continue Their Childish Games . . . .Opportunity Lost . . . Will Never Get It Back. . . . . LOL .
  • 10 hours Oil Rises After Iran Says It Seized Foreign Tanker In Gulf
  • 15 hours Drone For Drone = War: What is next in the U.S. - Iran the Gulf Episode
  • 2 hours Renewables provided only about 4% of total global energy needs in 2018
  • 19 hours Today in Energy
  • 2 days Populist, But Good: Elizabeth Warren Takes Aim at Private-Equity Funds
  • 2 days Mnuchin Says No Change To U.S. Dollar Policy ‘As of Now’
  • 1 day Why Natural Gas is Natural
  • 1 day LA Solar Power/Storage Contract
  • 6 hours U.S. Administration Moves To End Asylum Protections For Central Americans
An Unexpected Boon For Alberta’s Oil Producers

An Unexpected Boon For Alberta’s Oil Producers

Canadian Light oil prices have…

Coal’s Long Goodbye

Coal’s Long Goodbye

U.S. coal producers continue to…

U.S. May Help Other Countries Handle Nuclear Waste

Nuclear plant

The U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is considering helping other countries handle their nuclear waste with U.S.-owned and operated technology in a bid to stay competitive in nuclear disposal technology globally, Reuters reported on Wednesday, quoting two sources familiar with the plans.

The NNSA confirmed to Reuters that there was a project to help other nations handle nuclear waste but declined to provide specifics on the plans.

“We are in the conceptual phase of identifying approaches that could reduce the quantity of spent nuclear fuel without creating proliferation risks - a goal with significant economic and security benefits,” NNSA spokesman Dov Schwartz told Reuters.

Schwartz noted, however, that the approach the U.S. is working on doesn’t involve reprocessing of nuclear waste—an approach banned by President Jimmy Carter in 1977 because it results in purer uranium and plutonium that could be used to make nuclear bombs.

According to Reuters sources, the U.S. could send the technology in a “black box” the size of a shipping container to other countries, but the technology would be owned and operated by the United States.

“That way you could address a country’s concerns about spent fuel without transferring ownership of the technology to them,” one of the sources told Reuters.

There are three main ways to reduce the volume of nuclear waste, according to the sources who spoke to Reuters. One is consolidation which is expensive but not too security risky; another is heating radioactive pellets in spent fuel assemblies, also costly, but also dangerous to the environment and human health; and the third one is the so-called pyroprocessing which puts the spent nuclear fuel in liquid metal and runs an electric current through it. Pyroprocessing reduces waste volume but boosts uranium and plutonium concentration, making this process a potential security and proliferation risk.

The sources who spoke to Reuters didn’t specify countries that could receive U.S.-operated technology to reduce their nuclear waste, but expressed concern that the processes could increase the risk of potentially dangerous nuclear materials falling in the hands of militants or groups unfriendly to the U.S.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play