• 9 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 19 minutes Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 1 hour Downloadable 3D Printed Gun Designs, Yay or Nay?
  • 3 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 2 hours Rattling With Weapons: Iran Must Develop Military To Guard Against Other Powers
  • 8 hours Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 5 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 55 mins China goes against US natural gas
  • 9 hours CO2 Emissions Hit 67-Year Low In USA, As Rest-Of-World Rises
  • 4 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 17 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 18 hours The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 20 hours How To Explain 'Truth Isn't Truth' Comment of Rudy Giuliani?
  • 11 hours Saudi PIF In Talks To Invest In Tesla Rival Lucid
  • 12 hours Film on Venezuela's staggering collapse
Is Deepwater Drilling More Profitable Than Shale?

Is Deepwater Drilling More Profitable Than Shale?

Conventional wisdom in oil markets…

UK Government Rejects £25 Billion Tidal-Energy Barrage Project

Hafren Power Ltd. submitted a plan to the British government to build a £25 billion ($40 billion) tidal-energy barrage across the river Severn, which would generate as much as five percent of the nation’s energy needs.

A government report into the barrage concluded that the project would not offer value for money, and could damage the environment. The government suggested that Hafren must improve its offer if it ever wishes to receive serious consideration.

Tidal barrages are fairly common in other countries, such as in the Netherlands, and generate energy from water as it travels in and out of rivers or bays due to the tide. Water moves into a rivers estuary as the tide increases, and then turbines create electricity as the water recedes with low tide.

Related Article: UK Wind and Marine Power Sector Employs Three Times as Many as Coal Industry

Andrew Cox, the global head of energy and natural resources at KPMG LLP, said that “financing such a large asset isn’t currently possible in the private market, not least due to the size of the financing required but also the significant construction risk involved. Government support would be the only means to finance such a scheme.”

Severn Tidal Barrage

The report claims that the project, which would be about 11 miles in length, would need to be supported by the state, in the form of power purchase agreements, for about 30 years, twice as long as offshore wind farms.

In its next plan submission Hafren must include more detail on the potential effect that the development will have on the environment, the economy, jobs, and the local industry.

Cox said that “the scheme would need a significant subsidy compared to current market prices and there seems to be little evidence that the technology can be sufficiently competitive.”

Related Article: UK Could Become Leader in CCS Market with North Sea Plans

Stephanie Merry, the head of marine renewables at the UK`s Renewable Energy Association, said that they should develop a smaller tidal barrage project first, and learn what they could, before attempting a far larger project such as the Severn Barrage.

She also suggested that instead of a tidal barrage the Severn would be a good location to install a tidal lagoon power facility, which can also generate large amounts of energy without the impact on the environment that a barrage has.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News