• 6 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes Saudis Pull Hyperloop Funding As Branson Temporarily Cuts Ties With The Kingdom
  • 12 mins WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 5 hours Saudi-Kuwaiti Talks on Shared Oil Stall Over Chevron
  • 6 mins The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 9 hours OPEC's No. 2 Producer Wants to Know How Buyers Use Its Oil
  • 3 hours Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 11 hours Iranian Sanctions - What Are The Facts?
  • 5 hours UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 6 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 4 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 2 hours COLORADO FOCUS: Stocks to Watch Prior to Midterms
  • 12 hours U.S. - Saudi Arabia: President Trump Says Saudi Arabia's King Wouldn't Survive "Two Weeks" Without U.S. Backing
  • 12 hours Superhumans
  • 1 hour Nopec Sherman act legislation
U.S. And Europe Divided On The Future Of Oil

U.S. And Europe Divided On The Future Of Oil

Oil majors in Europe and…

Why Is This Little-Known Element Up Over 300%

Why Is This Little-Known Element Up Over 300%

Element ‘’V’’, better known as…

Shell Faces Heat As 1991 Video On Climate Change Resurfaces

Shell Logo

Shell is coming under heat this week after the rediscovery of a film the company produced in 1991 that detailed the effects of manmade climate change, the Earth’s natural reaction to the accelerated release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as a direct result of the burning of Shell’s main product – fossil fuels.

The film, deftly named Climate of Concern, warned of extreme flooding, climate refugees and famine as coal, oil and natural gas continued to be burned for their energy output.

The message of the firm was “endorsed by a uniquely broad consensus of scientists in their report to the United Nations at the end of 1990,” the film’s narrator said. “If the weather machine were to be wound up to such new levels of energy, no country would remain unaffected. Global warming is not yet certain, but many think that to wait for final proof would be irresponsible. Action now is seen as the only safe insurance.”

Despite its awareness of the effects of climate change 26 years ago, Shell spent $22 million in 2015 lobbying against policies that protected the environment from carbon emissions. Its investments in green energies have been low compared to the size of its fossil fuel ventures.

Other companies of comparable size and fame have faced scrutiny for their role in either hiding or misleading the public of the scale of risks associated with climate change.

Related: Trillions or Billions – What Is Aramco’s IPO Actually Worth?

ExxonMobil faced legal action from the Obama administration after a group of journalism students from Columbia University found evidence that the company worked with the Los Angeles Times to “publicly cast doubt” on the existence of global warning, despite being aware of the research that proved the phenomenon’s progress.

By Zainab Calcuttawala for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


x

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News