• 3 minutes Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 7 minutes Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 12 minutes Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 14 hours Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 6 hours Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 17 hours Tesla Closing a Dozen Solar Facilities in Nine States
  • 14 hours Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 15 hours EU Leaders Set To Prolong Russia Sanctions Again
  • 14 hours Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 45 mins Oil prices going Up? NO!
  • 14 hours Oil Buyers Club
  • 17 hours Why is permian oil "locked in" when refineries abound?
  • 7 hours Oil prices going down
  • 17 hours EVs Could Help Coal Demand
  • 23 hours China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
  • 23 hours Saudi Arabia plans to physically cut off Qatar by moat, nuclear waste and military base
  • 5 hours Russia's Energy Minister says Oil Prices Balanced at $75, so Wants to Increase OPEC + Russia Oil by 1.5 mbpd
  • 7 mins Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 12 hours Saudi Arabia turns to solar
Shale Shifts Attention To This ‘Forgotten’ Oil Play

Shale Shifts Attention To This ‘Forgotten’ Oil Play

As the Permian becomes overcrowded,…

Where Will U.S. Frackers Drill Next?

Where Will U.S. Frackers Drill Next?

With oil prices having stayed…

Shell Faces Heat As 1991 Video On Climate Change Resurfaces

Shell Logo

Shell is coming under heat this week after the rediscovery of a film the company produced in 1991 that detailed the effects of manmade climate change, the Earth’s natural reaction to the accelerated release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as a direct result of the burning of Shell’s main product – fossil fuels.

The film, deftly named Climate of Concern, warned of extreme flooding, climate refugees and famine as coal, oil and natural gas continued to be burned for their energy output.

The message of the firm was “endorsed by a uniquely broad consensus of scientists in their report to the United Nations at the end of 1990,” the film’s narrator said. “If the weather machine were to be wound up to such new levels of energy, no country would remain unaffected. Global warming is not yet certain, but many think that to wait for final proof would be irresponsible. Action now is seen as the only safe insurance.”

Despite its awareness of the effects of climate change 26 years ago, Shell spent $22 million in 2015 lobbying against policies that protected the environment from carbon emissions. Its investments in green energies have been low compared to the size of its fossil fuel ventures.

Other companies of comparable size and fame have faced scrutiny for their role in either hiding or misleading the public of the scale of risks associated with climate change.

Related: Trillions or Billions – What Is Aramco’s IPO Actually Worth?

ExxonMobil faced legal action from the Obama administration after a group of journalism students from Columbia University found evidence that the company worked with the Los Angeles Times to “publicly cast doubt” on the existence of global warning, despite being aware of the research that proved the phenomenon’s progress.

By Zainab Calcuttawala for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News