• 5 minutes Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 9 minutes Sell out now or hold on?
  • 16 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 6 mins Oil prices going down
  • 7 hours When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 19 hours Two Koreas Agree To March Together At Asian Games
  • 7 hours Oil and Trade War
  • 9 hours Russia and Saudi Arabia to have a chat on oil during FIFA World Cup - report
  • 9 hours Sell out now or hold on?
  • 7 hours venezuala oil crisis
  • 6 hours Trump Hits China With Tariffs On $50 Billion Of Goods
  • 11 hours Correlation Between Oil Sweet Spots and Real Estate Hot Spots
  • 6 hours Germany Orders Daimler to Recall 774,000 Diesel Cars in Europe
  • 10 hours Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 4 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 20 hours Geopolitical and Political Risks make their strong comeback to global oil and gas markets
  • 3 hours The Wonderful U.S. Oil Trade Deficit with Canada
  • 17 hours Trump Renews Attack On OPEC Ahead Of Group's Production Meeting
  • 5 hours After Three Decade Macedonia End Dispute With Greece, new name: the Republic of Northern Macedonia

Prominent Republican Senator Flubs Climate Change Question

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), who says he is considering a run for the U.S. presidency, is apparently unsure of where he stands on the issue of climate change.

In an interview broadcast May 12 on ABC News, Rubio said he believes that the climate is changing but added, “I do not believe that human activity is causing these dramatic changes to our climate the way these scientists are portraying it.”

In fact, Rubio said, the climate has always changed. He disputed that humans can lessen the effects of climate change by changing their behavior.

“What [climate scientists] have chosen to do is take a handful of decades of research and say that this is now evidence of a longer-term trend that’s directly and almost solely attributable to man-made activity,” he said.

Rubio’s comments contradict a recent major U.S. government scientific report that concluded that climate change is “driven primarily by human activity” and is already being felt across the United States. (The report also noted that Florida – which happens to be Rubio’s home state – is particularly vulnerable to coastal storms and flooding if global temperatures continue to rise.)

Two days after his comments to ABC, following a speech at the National Press Club in Washington, Rubio was asked about his climate change comments and was unable to cite a single source for his belief.

And his stance seemed to soften, leaving room for the possibility that human activity does, in fact, contribute to climate change.

Rubio’s answer focused on “cap and trade,” a policy tool that provides incentives to companies that reduce their carbon emissions.

“What I disagree with,” Rubio said, “is the notion if we pass cap and trade, for example, this will stop [climate change] from happening, when in fact half of the new emissions on the planet are coming from developing countries and half of that is coming from one country, China, that isn’t going to follow whatever laws we pass.”

This isn’t the first time Rubio has demonstrated his skepticism of science. In November 2012 he told GQ magazine that the actual age of the Earth is “one of the great mysteries.”

Specifically, he said, "I don't think I'm qualified to answer a question like that. At the end of the day, I think there are multiple theories out there on how the universe was created and I think this is a country where people should have the opportunity to teach them all.”

He also isn’t the first Republican member of Congress to dismiss the fossil record. In October, 2012, Representative Paul Broun (R-GA) said the Earth is no more than 9,000 years old and dismissed evolution as “lies straight from the pit of hell.”

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Stephen Kriz on May 16 2014 said:
    Marco Rubio is a very ignorant and arrogant young man! I'm sure he doesn't have an eighth graders understanding of the natural sciences and has no clue about radiative forcing or the isotopes of carbon being found in the troposphere that unmistakeable fingerprints of burning fossil fuels. These vermin would rather see their chdren burn than admit a liberal hippie was right about anything. They are ignorant, cowardly worms who need to be crushed under the boot of scientific progress!
  • Harry Fenlason on May 15 2014 said:
    Both Brown and Rubio are correct. Science has been too politicized.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News