• 3 hours LNG Glut To Continue Into 2020s, IEA Says
  • 5 hours Oil Nears $52 With Record OPEC Deal Compliance
  • 8 hours Saudi Aramco CEO Affirms IPO On Track For H2 2018
  • 10 hours Canadia Ltd. Returns To Sudan For First Time Since Oil Price Crash
  • 12 hours Syrian Rebel Group Takes Over Oil Field From IS
  • 3 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 3 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 3 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 3 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 3 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 3 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 3 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 4 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 4 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 4 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 4 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 4 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 4 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 4 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 5 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 5 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 5 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 5 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 5 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 6 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 6 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 6 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 6 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 6 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 6 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 7 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls

Breaking News:

LNG Glut To Continue Into 2020s, IEA Says

Big Oil Refuses To Give Up On The Barents Sea

Big Oil Refuses To Give Up On The Barents Sea

Despite failures in the Barents…

Can Trump Drive A Wedge Between Saudi-Russian Alliance?

Can Trump Drive A Wedge Between Saudi-Russian Alliance?

Trump’s Iran deal decertification threatens…

Pentagon Claims New Transmission Line is a Threat to National Security

Pentagon Claims New Transmission Line is a Threat to National Security

The Department of Defence has joined environmental groups in opposition of a 515 mile high-voltage transmission line that is proposed to carry electricity generated at Wind Farms in New Mexico to cities in Arizona and California.

Nextgov wrote that “the proposed SunZia system includes two single-circuit, bi-directional 500 kV transmission lines strung from 135-foot towers spaced 1,400 feet apart along the proposed route.” The lines will run from a substation near to Corona, New Mexico, to a different substation near to the town of Eloy, Arizona.

On the 14th of June the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) selected a preferred route for the transmission lines, but environmentalists and the Pentagon were left unhappy.

Related article: World Energy Markets Leaving EU Behind

Environmentalists are unhappy that the route will carry the lines through 40 miles of the undeveloped San Pedro River Valley, but the Pentagon has gone further and claimed that the route actually threatens national security. This is because the BLM proposes to send the transmission lines across the north end of the White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), an act that will jeopardize future operations, according to military officials.

The White Sands Missile Range.
The White Sands Missile Range. (WSMR Historical Foundation)

Nextgov reports that Frank Kendall, the undersecretary of Defence, has asked David Hayes, the deputy secretary of the Interior (the agency that runs the BLM) to encourage a new route when the final environmental impact statement is released.

Kendall warned that the current plan will prevent “the capability to fully test the Joint Integrated Air and Missile Defense Architecture and other weapons systems under realistic threat environments at White Sands.

Related article: Why Oil is Good for Real Estate

This is due to the vertical obstruction such power lines would pose to low-level missile flight tests. It is possible that a missile could inadvertently strike the power line or catastrophically fail and shower debris on the power line.”

Katherine Hammack, the assistant secretary of the Army for installations, energy, and environment, has explained that “the impact to military mission would be significant and irreversible because we will no longer be able to conduct certain tests. White Sands Missile Range provides unique testing characteristics and capabilities that cannot be duplicated within the United States. The testing the military conducts at WSMR must be performed to ensure functionality of our military defense systems and preserve and protect our national security.”

Kendall suggests that if the current proposed must be used, then the lines should be buried when passing across the WSMR, in order to reduce the impact on training missions and tests.

Original article found at Nextgov.com

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News