• 45 mins Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 2 hours Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 hours Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 5 hours New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 6 hours Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 8 hours Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 14 hours Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 19 hours British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 23 hours Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 1 day Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 1 day Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 1 day OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 1 day London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 1 day Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 1 day Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 2 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 2 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 2 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 2 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 2 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 3 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 3 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 3 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 3 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 3 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 3 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 3 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 3 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 3 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 4 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 4 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 4 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 4 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 4 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 4 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 7 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 7 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 7 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 7 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
Oil Markets Fear Iraqi Escalation

Oil Markets Fear Iraqi Escalation

The military operation by Iraqi…

Finally: A Way To Invest In Blockchain

Finally: A Way To Invest In Blockchain

Cryptocurrencies and the blockchain are…

Oil Pipelines In Louisiana May Soon Be Buried At Sea

Pipeline

Louisiana’s shrinking coastline is causing headaches for the oil industry in that state, as an eroding coast and rising sea waters are threatening oil infrastructure.

The coastline is disappearing at a rate of approximately 20 square miles per year, which could mean that more than 610 miles of pipeline could be exposed over a period of 25 years. The loss of the coastline and the swamps and islands along the gulf also increase the risk of flooding further inland.

So far, from 1932 to 2010, Louisiana has lost approximately 1,880 square miles of land due to the eroding coastline. And while that seems slow, that’s more than four times the size of Hong Kong, and roughly equivalent to the entire land mass within the state of Delaware.

The state has plans to address the issue, but currently finds itself facing a $2 billion deficit, which means that energy companies could foot the bill for any environmental projects. However, according to America’s Wetlands Foundation and Entergy Corporation, oil and gas companies operating along Louisiana’s Gulf Coast already deal with an average loss of $14 billion per year from threats to the environment. By the year 2030, the cost could be over $350 billion.

Kai Midboe, director of policy research at the Water Institute of the Gulf is at the front of the effort to convince the energy industry to make investments in restoring the coastlines. According to Midboe, public funding for the effort will not come close to covering the costs. He is proposing a taskforce that would identify projects for restoration that would protect infrastructure and other assets. The companies would pay dues, which would cover operational costs, and they would share the construction costs for projects that would benefit them.

An example of such a partnership can be found in the effort between America’s Wetlands Foundation and ConocoPhillips, ChevronCorp, and CITGO Petroleum Corp, who are working together on the construction of a $1 million project that is expected to mitigate erosion on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway.

ConocoPhillips spokeswoman Andrea Urbanek said that a combination of public and private money was used to pay for 77 restoration projects, which enhanced 177,000 acres of wetlands owned by ConocoPhillips, the largest private wetlands owner in Louisiana.

Other measures to improve resiliency of the coastline are being undertaken with funds received from BP Plc and others from the Deepwater Horizon event.

By Lincoln Brown for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Gregory Foreman on August 18 2016 said:
    Such is the scapegoat syndrome. The real blame for Louisiana’s eroding coast line falls squarely on the shoulders of the Army Corp of Engineers. After the great floods of the 1920’s, the Corp developed the levee system along the Mississippi and Atchafalaya River basins in order to “control” the water flow and restrict flooding. This system has accomplished its goal however with devastating consequences. The river basins are “controlled”, floods have been reduced, but at a major cost to the basin estuaries and marshes. The “controlled” river flows no longer can deposit the sediment rich in nutrients necessary for the marshes to survive and flourish. Instead, the “flow deposits” go directly into the Gulf of Mexico, resulting in the marshes dying an ever so slow death, along the coastal erosion associated with its demise.
    However, for the “chicken little’s” of the world, it’s easier to over simplify and solidify the problem by blaming one villain, one enemy, the oil companies. This is another example of how prejudice and ignorance plays out when orchestrated by deaf, dumb and clueless enviornmentalist.
  • Dixon on August 17 2016 said:
    A common error is to describe the problem as erosion. The correct term is subsidence. LSU geologists have done massive research on the delta and coastline. Right now subsidence is greater than deposition but the human perception is one of erosion. This is false. The marshes need fresh sediment to replenish their aerial extent and this material is heading to deepwater because of the levees.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News