• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 1 min GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 3 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 4 hours If hydrogen is the answer, you're asking the wrong question
  • 4 days Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
  • 5 days The European Union is exceptional in its political divide. Examples are apparent in Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Netherlands, Belarus, Ireland, etc.
  • 17 hours Biden's $2 trillion Plan for Insfrastructure and Jobs
  • 4 days "What’s In Store For Europe In 2023?" By the CIA (aka RFE/RL as a ruse to deceive readers)
Why OPEC Should Be Worried About Oil Demand Forecasts

Why OPEC Should Be Worried About Oil Demand Forecasts

Demand forecasts from the IEA,…

What Does Putin’s Re-Election Mean for the World?

What Does Putin’s Re-Election Mean for the World?

Vladimir Putin's reelection will lead…

Oil Pipelines In Louisiana May Soon Be Buried At Sea

Louisiana’s shrinking coastline is causing headaches for the oil industry in that state, as an eroding coast and rising sea waters are threatening oil infrastructure.

The coastline is disappearing at a rate of approximately 20 square miles per year, which could mean that more than 610 miles of pipeline could be exposed over a period of 25 years. The loss of the coastline and the swamps and islands along the gulf also increase the risk of flooding further inland.

So far, from 1932 to 2010, Louisiana has lost approximately 1,880 square miles of land due to the eroding coastline. And while that seems slow, that’s more than four times the size of Hong Kong, and roughly equivalent to the entire land mass within the state of Delaware.

The state has plans to address the issue, but currently finds itself facing a $2 billion deficit, which means that energy companies could foot the bill for any environmental projects. However, according to America’s Wetlands Foundation and Entergy Corporation, oil and gas companies operating along Louisiana’s Gulf Coast already deal with an average loss of $14 billion per year from threats to the environment. By the year 2030, the cost could be over $350 billion.

Kai Midboe, director of policy research at the Water Institute of the Gulf is at the front of the effort to convince the energy industry to make investments in restoring the coastlines. According to Midboe, public funding for the effort will not come close to covering the costs. He is proposing a taskforce that would identify projects for restoration that would protect infrastructure and other assets. The companies would pay dues, which would cover operational costs, and they would share the construction costs for projects that would benefit them.

An example of such a partnership can be found in the effort between America’s Wetlands Foundation and ConocoPhillips, ChevronCorp, and CITGO Petroleum Corp, who are working together on the construction of a $1 million project that is expected to mitigate erosion on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway.

ConocoPhillips spokeswoman Andrea Urbanek said that a combination of public and private money was used to pay for 77 restoration projects, which enhanced 177,000 acres of wetlands owned by ConocoPhillips, the largest private wetlands owner in Louisiana.

Other measures to improve resiliency of the coastline are being undertaken with funds received from BP Plc and others from the Deepwater Horizon event.

ADVERTISEMENT

By Lincoln Brown for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Gregory Foreman on August 18 2016 said:
    Such is the scapegoat syndrome. The real blame for Louisiana’s eroding coast line falls squarely on the shoulders of the Army Corp of Engineers. After the great floods of the 1920’s, the Corp developed the levee system along the Mississippi and Atchafalaya River basins in order to “control” the water flow and restrict flooding. This system has accomplished its goal however with devastating consequences. The river basins are “controlled”, floods have been reduced, but at a major cost to the basin estuaries and marshes. The “controlled” river flows no longer can deposit the sediment rich in nutrients necessary for the marshes to survive and flourish. Instead, the “flow deposits” go directly into the Gulf of Mexico, resulting in the marshes dying an ever so slow death, along the coastal erosion associated with its demise.
    However, for the “chicken little’s” of the world, it’s easier to over simplify and solidify the problem by blaming one villain, one enemy, the oil companies. This is another example of how prejudice and ignorance plays out when orchestrated by deaf, dumb and clueless enviornmentalist.
  • Dixon on August 17 2016 said:
    A common error is to describe the problem as erosion. The correct term is subsidence. LSU geologists have done massive research on the delta and coastline. Right now subsidence is greater than deposition but the human perception is one of erosion. This is false. The marshes need fresh sediment to replenish their aerial extent and this material is heading to deepwater because of the levees.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News