• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 1 hour GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 2 days Could Someone Give Me Insights on the Future of Renewable Energy?
  • 43 mins The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 3 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 17 hours Bankruptcy in the Industry

Oil Industry’s Challenge Of Alaska Polar Bear Habitat Denied

The U.S. Supreme Court denied on Monday petitions brought up by the State of Alaska, native corporations, local governments, and the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, challenging the federal government’s decision to designate more than 187,000 square miles of critical habitat for the polar bear.

In 2010, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service designated more than 187,000 square miles of on-shore barrier islands, denning areas, and offshore sea-ice as critical habitat for the threatened polar bear under the Endangered Species Act.

Since 2010, the habitat designation has been challenged in various courts before ending up at the Justices who yesterday declined to hear the challenge filed by the State of Alaska and Alaska’s oil industry.

In 2013, a district court shot down the FWS habitat designation, but an appeals court overturned the district court’s ruling in 2016.

Now with the Supreme Court declining to hear the challenge to the appeals court ruling, the appeals court decision backing the FWS will stand, Alaska Dispatch News says.

Back in 2013, when a district court decided to vacate the polar bear critical habitat designation, Alaska Oil and Gas Association (AOGA) said that it applauded the court decision in what it saw as a win for the oil and gas industry in Alaska.

Then in February 2016, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s judgment, and remanded for entry of judgment in favor of FWS.

Related: What’s Behind This Sudden Drop In China’s Gold Production?

In their petition to the Supreme Court from November 2016, the petitioners challenging the habitat designation argued that “the sweeping designation overlaps almost all of the existing and proposed oil and gas operations on the North Slope, covers all of the home lands of some Native groups, and covers lands selected by the State of Alaska and Native groups pursuant to federal law to ensure the economic future of the people of Alaska.”

ADVERTISEMENT

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Bob Saget on May 05 2017 said:
    Too bad for Alaska, all they want to do is kill wildlife and make money from oil. What's the issue with that?

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News