• 1 hour UK On Track To Approve Construction of “Mini” Nuclear Reactors
  • 5 hours LNG Glut To Continue Into 2020s, IEA Says
  • 7 hours Oil Nears $52 With Record OPEC Deal Compliance
  • 10 hours Saudi Aramco CEO Affirms IPO On Track For H2 2018
  • 12 hours Canadia Ltd. Returns To Sudan For First Time Since Oil Price Crash
  • 14 hours Syrian Rebel Group Takes Over Oil Field From IS
  • 3 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 3 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 3 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 3 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 3 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 4 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 4 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 4 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 4 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 4 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 4 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 4 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 4 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 5 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 5 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 5 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 5 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 6 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 6 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 6 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 6 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 6 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 6 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 7 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 7 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
Can India Overtake China In The EV Revolution?

Can India Overtake China In The EV Revolution?

India wants to drastically increase…

Oil Industry’s Challenge Of Alaska Polar Bear Habitat Denied

Polar Bears

The U.S. Supreme Court denied on Monday petitions brought up by the State of Alaska, native corporations, local governments, and the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, challenging the federal government’s decision to designate more than 187,000 square miles of critical habitat for the polar bear.

In 2010, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service designated more than 187,000 square miles of on-shore barrier islands, denning areas, and offshore sea-ice as critical habitat for the threatened polar bear under the Endangered Species Act.

Since 2010, the habitat designation has been challenged in various courts before ending up at the Justices who yesterday declined to hear the challenge filed by the State of Alaska and Alaska’s oil industry.

In 2013, a district court shot down the FWS habitat designation, but an appeals court overturned the district court’s ruling in 2016.

Now with the Supreme Court declining to hear the challenge to the appeals court ruling, the appeals court decision backing the FWS will stand, Alaska Dispatch News says.

Back in 2013, when a district court decided to vacate the polar bear critical habitat designation, Alaska Oil and Gas Association (AOGA) said that it applauded the court decision in what it saw as a win for the oil and gas industry in Alaska.

Then in February 2016, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s judgment, and remanded for entry of judgment in favor of FWS.

Related: What’s Behind This Sudden Drop In China’s Gold Production?

In their petition to the Supreme Court from November 2016, the petitioners challenging the habitat designation argued that “the sweeping designation overlaps almost all of the existing and proposed oil and gas operations on the North Slope, covers all of the home lands of some Native groups, and covers lands selected by the State of Alaska and Native groups pursuant to federal law to ensure the economic future of the people of Alaska.”

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Bob Saget on May 05 2017 said:
    Too bad for Alaska, all they want to do is kill wildlife and make money from oil. What's the issue with that?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News