• 8 minutes U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 13 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 16 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 2 hours Knoema: Crude Oil Price Forecast: 2018, 2019 and Long Term to 2030
  • 9 hours Nuclear Pact/Cold War: Moscow Wants U.S. To Explain Planned Exit From Arms Treaty
  • 9 hours Why I Think Natural Gas is the Logical Future of Energy
  • 10 hours Merkel Aims To Ward Off Diesel Car Ban In Germany
  • 2 hours Get on Those Bicycles to Save the World
  • 8 hours A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 6 hours Iraq war and Possible Lies
  • 1 day Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 1 day Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 1 day Can “Renewables” Dent the World’s need for Electricity?
  • 16 hours Long-Awaited Slowdown in China Exports Still Isn’t Happening
  • 3 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 19 hours Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
Goldman Sachs: Oil Unlikely To Reach $100

Goldman Sachs: Oil Unlikely To Reach $100

Goldman Sachs’ chief commodities analyst…

Oil Industry’s Challenge Of Alaska Polar Bear Habitat Denied

Polar Bears

The U.S. Supreme Court denied on Monday petitions brought up by the State of Alaska, native corporations, local governments, and the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, challenging the federal government’s decision to designate more than 187,000 square miles of critical habitat for the polar bear.

In 2010, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service designated more than 187,000 square miles of on-shore barrier islands, denning areas, and offshore sea-ice as critical habitat for the threatened polar bear under the Endangered Species Act.

Since 2010, the habitat designation has been challenged in various courts before ending up at the Justices who yesterday declined to hear the challenge filed by the State of Alaska and Alaska’s oil industry.

In 2013, a district court shot down the FWS habitat designation, but an appeals court overturned the district court’s ruling in 2016.

Now with the Supreme Court declining to hear the challenge to the appeals court ruling, the appeals court decision backing the FWS will stand, Alaska Dispatch News says.

Back in 2013, when a district court decided to vacate the polar bear critical habitat designation, Alaska Oil and Gas Association (AOGA) said that it applauded the court decision in what it saw as a win for the oil and gas industry in Alaska.

Then in February 2016, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s judgment, and remanded for entry of judgment in favor of FWS.

Related: What’s Behind This Sudden Drop In China’s Gold Production?

In their petition to the Supreme Court from November 2016, the petitioners challenging the habitat designation argued that “the sweeping designation overlaps almost all of the existing and proposed oil and gas operations on the North Slope, covers all of the home lands of some Native groups, and covers lands selected by the State of Alaska and Native groups pursuant to federal law to ensure the economic future of the people of Alaska.”

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Bob Saget on May 05 2017 said:
    Too bad for Alaska, all they want to do is kill wildlife and make money from oil. What's the issue with that?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News