• 2 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 2 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 2 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 2 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 2 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 2 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 2 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 2 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 2 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 3 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 3 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 3 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 3 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 3 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 3 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 3 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 3 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 4 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 4 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 4 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 4 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 4 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 5 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 5 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 5 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 5 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 5 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 5 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 5 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 5 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 6 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 6 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 6 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 6 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 6 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 6 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Trump’s Iran Decision Haunts Big Oil

Trump’s Iran Decision Haunts Big Oil

Donald Trump’s Iran decision has…

Oil Stocks To Watch As Geopolitical Risk Mounts

Oil Stocks To Watch As Geopolitical Risk Mounts

Oil market sentiment has turned…

Oil Industry Gaining Ground In Washington To End Export Ban

Oil Industry Gaining Ground In Washington To End Export Ban

Congress is getting closer to voting on ending the 40-year-old ban on exporting U.S. crude oil, but even if the measure passes, it’s not clear whether President Obama will sign it or veto it.

In September, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, Republican of California, promised to allow a vote on a measure drawn up by Rep. Joe Barton, a Texas Republican, that would allow unlimited exports. Similar legislation, jointly written by Republican Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Democrat Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, is under consideration in the Senate.

Many other Democrats, including Obama, oppose such legislation, saying it’s unnecessary because the Commerce Department is already empowered to approve occasional exceptions to the ban. Nevertheless, supporters say they are willing to accept a compromise acceptable to both sides.

Related: Six Reasons Natural Gas Prices Are Staying Down

For example, on Oct. 1, the Senate Banking Committee approved the Murkowski-Heitkamp bill, despite nay votes from virtually all Democrats on the panel. Yet some of these opponents said they hadn’t ruled out some form of legislation that would allow a resumption of exports.

One was Democratic Sen. Jon Tester of Montana. He said his state could benefit financially from an end to the ban if the bill included language on energy conservation or renewable energy initiatives. “These are all important things,” he said, “and I think if we work together in a bipartisan way – set politics aside – we can do some things that are very positive for the country with this ban.”

That doesn’t mean Democrats will simply accept exports, but even the faintest evidence of bipartisanship in Congress, especially between House Republicans and Senate Democrats, is a sign that the legislation sponsored by Barton, Murkowski and Heitkamp isn’t a pipe dream.

“The sooner this happens, the better for us,” said Kenneth Cohen, Exxon Mobil’s vice president for public and governmental affairs. “The momentum has picked up. The political calculus right now is very favorable for taking a look and actually doing something about this ban.”

Related: Is Russia Plotting To Bring Down OPEC?

One reason such legislation is progressing in Congress is the U.S. oil industry’s huge lobbying effort in Washington. They argue that resuming exports will lead to more jobs in the industry and ancillary businesses, and will lead to increased domestic oil production, thereby driving down the cost consumers pay for fuel.

The industry has given generously to think tanks and similar organizations to issue reports and news commentaries supporting an end to the ban, and has paid for television ads identifying House Democrats who may be persuaded to shift from opponents of the legislation to supporters.

For example, Producers for American Crude Oil Exports (PACE) has bought television ads shown on cable news networks and during sports events in nine states, including California, Florida and Texas, calling on citizens to urge their representatives to vote for Barton’s bill.

Related: What Will Happen To Oil Prices When China Fills Its SPR?

A lifting of the ban is opposed by the CRUDE Coalition, an alliance of oil refineries, and the United Steelworkers Union, which represents refinery employees. Both argue that resuming unlimited exports would mean less work for domestic refineries, thereby reducing the number of U.S. jobs and leading to increased worldwide air pollution from foreign refineries.

The ban on crude exports was imposed in 1975 in response to the Arab oil embargo that withheld most Middle Eastern oil from the United States because of Washington’s support of Israel during the 1973 Yom Kippur War. The measure had only a few exemptions, such as permitting exports to Canada.

In the past few years, however, increased U.S. oil production, mostly from shale fields, has made American a major player in the oil markets once again and even contributed to the current oil glut, which has caused oil prices to plummet since the summer of 2014.

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News