• 6 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 10 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 15 minutes Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 6 hours Judge Approves SEC Settlement With Tesla, Musk
  • 10 mins U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 11 mins How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 17 mins UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 3 hours Iranian Sanctions - What Are The Facts?
  • 30 mins China Thirsty for Canadian Crude
  • 5 hours Porsche Says That it ‘Enters the Electric Era With The New Taycan’
  • 4 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 7 hours Saudi Crown Prince to Trump: We've Replaced All Iran's Lost Oil
  • 7 hours Mexico State Oil
  • 5 hours Gold price on a rise...
  • 2 hours Two Koreas: U.N. Command Wrap Up First Talks On Disarming Border
  • 58 mins Shell, partners approve huge $31 billion LNG Canada project. How long till Canadian Federal government Environmentalates it into the ground?
Are U.S. Oil Exports Really Unstoppable?

Are U.S. Oil Exports Really Unstoppable?

U.S. crude oil exports hit…

South Korea Cuts Iran Oil Imports To Zero

South Korea Cuts Iran Oil Imports To Zero

U.S. ally South Korea has…

Oil Drilling Firm May Disclose All Its Fracking Chemicals

Oil field services firm Baker Hughes says that it is considering disclosing all of the chemicals it uses in its fracking operations. In a statement posted on its website April 24, the company said it “believes it is possible to disclose 100 percent of the chemical ingredients we use in hydraulic fracturing fluids without compromising our formulations — a balance that increases public trust while encouraging commercial innovation.”

Baker Hughes said it believes that making its chemical use transparent will enhance public trust in fracking, which has been shaken by reports of negative health consequences for people who live near drilling sites. A jury in Texas just awarded a family $3 million in damages after they suffered health problems as a result of a fracking site near their home.

The fact that Baker Hughes explicitly said it would divulge 100 percent of the chemicals it uses suggests that it would not make exceptions for trade secrets. But the company did say that it would only disclose the chemicals “where accepted by our customers and relevant government authorities.” It is conceivable that a firm contracting out Baker Hughes for drilling operations would object to the disclosure.

Several large oil companies, including ExxonMobil and Chevron, have resisted shareholder advocacy campaigns calling on them to disclose, but they have resisted, saying such a move is unnecessary because they already report everything to state regulators. 

Related Article: Jury Awards $3M To Family In Fracking Lawsuit

Now, the fact that Baker Hughes believes it will not lose a competitive edge by disclosing its entire slate of chemicals will put greater pressure on other companies to follow suit.  At the very least, it sets a new standard for transparency in the oil and gas sector.

Some companies have voluntarily disclosed the chemicals they use during fracking on the web site FracFocus.org (a website partially funded by Department of Energy and the shale industry) but many companies avoid listing all of them, citing trade secrets.

According to a DOE study, about 84 percent of wells registered on FracFocus.org do not have data on the chemicals used because of trade secrets.

The federal government is set to finalize regulations on fracking on public lands later this year, which would require full disclosure of chemicals.

By Charles Kennedy of OIlprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News