• 4 minute Hey Oil Bulls - How Long Till Increasing Oil Prices and Strengthening Dollar Start Killing Demand in Developing Countries?
  • 8 minutes Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 15 minutes Oil and Trade War
  • 47 mins Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 8 hours Migrants: Italy Wants EU Border Agency In Africa, Not At Sea
  • 5 hours Are EVs Safer Than Combustion Engine Vehicles?
  • 2 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 4 hours WE Solutions plans to print cars
  • 4 hours Russia, Saudi Push For Big Hike In Oil Output Despite Iran Opposition
  • 4 hours Oil prices going down
  • 9 hours Nopec Sherman act legislation
  • 15 hours Sabotage at Tesla
  • 8 hours Sell out now or hold on?
  • 13 hours China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 3 hours Australia mulls LNG import
  • 11 hours The Irrelevance Of BTU Rating - Big Oil's Gimmick To Hoodwink The Public
  • 11 hours After Three Decade Macedonia End Dispute With Greece, new name: the Republic of Northern Macedonia
  • 3 hours Oil and Trade War
  • 10 hours Trump Hits China With Tariffs On $50 Billion Of Goods
The Last Oil Frontier In The Gulf Of Mexico

The Last Oil Frontier In The Gulf Of Mexico

The potential of the U.S.…

Oil Drilling Firm May Disclose All Its Fracking Chemicals

Oil field services firm Baker Hughes says that it is considering disclosing all of the chemicals it uses in its fracking operations. In a statement posted on its website April 24, the company said it “believes it is possible to disclose 100 percent of the chemical ingredients we use in hydraulic fracturing fluids without compromising our formulations — a balance that increases public trust while encouraging commercial innovation.”

Baker Hughes said it believes that making its chemical use transparent will enhance public trust in fracking, which has been shaken by reports of negative health consequences for people who live near drilling sites. A jury in Texas just awarded a family $3 million in damages after they suffered health problems as a result of a fracking site near their home.

The fact that Baker Hughes explicitly said it would divulge 100 percent of the chemicals it uses suggests that it would not make exceptions for trade secrets. But the company did say that it would only disclose the chemicals “where accepted by our customers and relevant government authorities.” It is conceivable that a firm contracting out Baker Hughes for drilling operations would object to the disclosure.

Several large oil companies, including ExxonMobil and Chevron, have resisted shareholder advocacy campaigns calling on them to disclose, but they have resisted, saying such a move is unnecessary because they already report everything to state regulators. 

Related Article: Jury Awards $3M To Family In Fracking Lawsuit

Now, the fact that Baker Hughes believes it will not lose a competitive edge by disclosing its entire slate of chemicals will put greater pressure on other companies to follow suit.  At the very least, it sets a new standard for transparency in the oil and gas sector.

Some companies have voluntarily disclosed the chemicals they use during fracking on the web site FracFocus.org (a website partially funded by Department of Energy and the shale industry) but many companies avoid listing all of them, citing trade secrets.

According to a DOE study, about 84 percent of wells registered on FracFocus.org do not have data on the chemicals used because of trade secrets.

The federal government is set to finalize regulations on fracking on public lands later this year, which would require full disclosure of chemicals.

By Charles Kennedy of OIlprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News