• 6 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 10 hours Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 3 hours U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 2 days US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 1 day EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 7 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 4 hours Owning stocks long-term low risk?
  • 2 days The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 11 hours Can “Renewables” Dent the World’s need for Electricity?
  • 2 days Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 2 days 47 Oil & Gas Projects Expected to Start in SE Asia between 2018 & 2025
  • 2 days A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 2 days OPEC Is Struggling To Deliver On Increased Output Pledge
  • 22 hours The end of "King Coal" in the Wales
South Korea Cuts Iran Oil Imports To Zero

South Korea Cuts Iran Oil Imports To Zero

U.S. ally South Korea has…

BP CEO: $80 Oil Is Unhealthy For The World

BP CEO: $80 Oil Is Unhealthy For The World

BP Chief Executive Bob Dudley…

Obama Unveils his Climate Change Policies

As he unveils his new climate change policies, President Obama declared that, in a matter of national interest, carbon emissions must be cut; a move that will affect almost every sector in the economy.

During his speech at Georgetown University, he stated, “I don’t have much patience for anyone that denies that this challenge is real. Sticking your head in the sand might make you feel safer but it’s not going to protect you from the coming storm.”

He briefly mentioned the Keystone XL debate, and hinted that it would only be approved if it did not add to the overall carbon emissions for the nation.

“Our national interest will be served only if this project does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution. The net effect of the pipeline’s impact on our climate will be absolutely critical to determining whether this project is allowed to go forward.”

Related article: Nuclear Energy Innovation is Vital for Slowing Climate Change

This is fairly neutral statement on the surface, but when digging deeper it could possibly be considered as leaning towards a decision of approval. Obama has basically admitted that approval is very likely to be given if the pipeline project has no negative impact on climate change. Yet a report released at the beginning of March has already confirmed that the pipeline will have no impact because the oil sands are going to be mined regardless.

The central aspect of the climate change plans are the limits that he is set to place on carbon emissions from power plants. Power plant emissions account for 40% of all US carbon dioxide emissions, and a third of total greenhouse gas emissions, according to the EIA.

Kevin Kennedy, director of the climate initiative at the World Resources Institute, said that “there really is a need to be able to move ahead with a regime of solutions throughout the economy. But starting now with power plants is going to be a big first step.”

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com


x

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • John Lynch on June 29 2013 said:
    This is completely insane we have no problem with carbon emissions what so ever, it is a well know fact that plants thrive on carbon dioxide, see for you self http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOyN9kT6PA4&feature=share&list=PL1443077BDA9EDFFC. So how about a real solution plant more trees but not just trees that are pleasing to the eyes, but fruit trees that are both pleasing to the eye and nourishing to the body. Rico Montenegro purposes to plant 18 billion fruit trees world wide. Wow what a concept doing something positive to counter a so called negetive.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News