• 4 minutes Why Trump Is Right to Re-Open the Economy
  • 7 minutes Did Trump start the oil price war?
  • 11 minutes Covid-19 logarithmic growth
  • 15 minutes Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 18 minutes China Takes Axe To Alternative Energy Funding, Slashing Subsidies For Solar And Wind
  • 8 hours Dr. Fauci is over rated.
  • 39 mins TRUMP pushing Hydroxychloroquine + Zpak therapy forward despite FDA conservative approach. As he reasons, "What have we got to lose ?"
  • 3 hours China extracts record amount of natural gas from Gas Hydrates in South China Sea
  • 6 hours Western Canadian Select selling for $6.48 bbl. Enbridge charges between $7 to $9 bbl to ship to the GOM refineries.
  • 19 hours Dept of Energy ditches plans to buy Crude Oil for SPR
  • 36 mins Where's the storage?
  • 3 hours Hillary Clinton tweeted a sick Covid joke just to attack Trump
  • 5 hours Oxford Epidemiologist: Here’s Why That Covid-19 Doomsday Model Is Likely Way Off
  • 20 hours Wastewater Infrastructure Needs
  • 1 day Analysis into the Iran Outbreak
  • 20 hours >>The falling of the Persian Gulf oil empires is near <<

New Oil By Rail Safety Regs Not Nearly Enough

New Oil By Rail Safety Regs Not Nearly Enough

The stricter new safety standards being imposed by US and Canadian officials on trains hauling crude oil aren’t sitting well with either the rail industry or with environmentalists, who are considering lawsuits to fight parts they disapprove of.

In Washington on May 1, US Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx and Canadian Transport Minister Lisa Raitt announced the new regulations, which will require shippers to reinforce the tank cars containing crude and other flammables in North America by Oct. 1. Older cars will have to be upgraded within a few years or taken out of service.

The rules also will require that the cars be equipped with a new electronic braking system on some trains by January 2021.

Related: How Much Would Zero Emissions Cost?

Environmentalists and safety advocates have been urging both countries to mandate reinforced tank cars for years, especially since a runaway oil train exploded in the Quebec Township of Lac-Mégantic on July 6, 2013, killing 47 people. This was only one of several such accidents in North America, though none of the others were fatal.

“Since 2008, we’ve seen a staggering, staggering, 4,000 percent increase in the transport of crude by rail,” Foxx said, because of the increased production of oil from US shale and Canadian oil sands. But he stressed that 99.9 percent of those oil shipments reach their destination safely.

Still, Foxx added, “The accidents involving crude and ethanol that have occurred, though, have shown us that 99.9 percent isn’t enough. We have to strive for perfection.”

Related: Oil Field Services To Bear The Brunt Of Price Collapse

The rail and energy industries say this is no way to improve safety. Edward Hamberger, president and CEO of the Association of American Railroads, said in a phone call with reporters on May 1 that regulators are imposing the new braking system based on what he says is an inadequate study of braking systems.

“How does that stack up against the president’s call for good common-sense regulations when you’re basing a regulation on a study that the author himself says ‘should be taken with a grain of salt’?” he asks.

David Friedman of American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers says the regulations will do little to prevent derailments. “These tank cars don’t breach unless they’ve gone off the tracks,” he said, “so our message continues to be that we’ve got to keep the cars on the tracks.”

Related: Oil, The Fed And The Ugly Truth About Capital Markets

Environmentalists are also challenging the new rule allowing a delay before reinforced tank cars are required, leaving open a window of time for even more accidents.

Existing tank cars hauling crude from the Bakken shale formations bordering western areas of the United States and Canada must comply with the new rules within five years. But these cars can continue hauling other forms of crude oil, as well as ethanol, for an additional three years after that without undergoing any retrofitting.

A group of environmental groups including the Sierra Club, Earthjustice and the National Resources Defense Council said the delay would threaten not only the environment but also public safety. “We are seriously considering challenging the rule, in particular the very long phase-out period,” said Patti Goldman, managing attorney for Earthjustice in Seattle.

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage




Leave a comment
  • Bud on May 06 2015 said:
    Many, many more people are killed each year by soccer moms getting stuck on the train tracks. Are we going to ban certain drivers from the road?

    The accident in Canada was either sabotage, incompetence or laziness...and unforgivable. The way that gets handled is by bankrupting the operator and forcing more responsible companies to take over the line.

    Allowing russian and saudi funded environmentalists to determine economic policy is just stupid...again I am waiting for the commercials about rain forest destruction in Africa, LA, and Asia.

    And how about the billions of new people these continents are going to add this century...I don't hear anyone talking about t hat to the potato chip crowd either..

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News