• 5 minutes Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 11 minutes Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 17 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 1 hour Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 22 hours The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 10 hours Pakistan: "Heart" Of Terrorism and Global Threat
  • 1 hour Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 5 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 15 hours Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 6 hours Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 8 hours Are Trump's steel tariffs working? Seems they are!
  • 2 days Newspaper Editorials Across U.S. Rebuke Trump For Attacks On Press
  • 2 days Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 20 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 1 day Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
  • 2 days WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August

Nature Journal Tells Obama to Support Keystone XL

One of the world's preeminent science journals has lent its support to the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline in a recent editorial.

An editorial published in the 29 January issue of Nature, one of the world's leading science periodicals, has called for the Obama administration to rebuff criticism of the Keystone XL project and approve it as long as environmental standards are satisfied.

Related article: From Shale Boom to Refinery Revolution: Massive Investment Potential

While conceding that tar-sands development creates air and water quality issues for Canada, the Nature editorial points out that tar sands will be developed irrespective of the US government's stance as they fall beyond its jurisdiction, and asserts that Obama will garner political capital amongst conservatives via construction of the pipeline, which will enable him to do greater good in other areas.

Mike Hudema, a climate and energy activist with Greenpeace Canada, has criticized the Nature editorial, telling CBC that the crux of the issue is avoiding investment in the use of fossil fuels completely.

By. Marc Howe



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News