• 3 minutes Is Pete Buttigieg emerging as the most likely challenger to Trump?
  • 6 minutes Question: Why are oil futures so low through 2020?
  • 9 minutes Don't sneeze. Coronavirus is a threat to oil markets and global economies
  • 3 hours Energy from thin air?
  • 3 hours Fast-charging, long-running, bendy energy storage breakthrough
  • 7 hours Can LNG Kill Oil?
  • 13 hours CoV-19: China, WHO, myth vs fact
  • 1 day Has Trump put the USA at the service of Israel?
  • 9 hours The New Class War Exposes the Oligarchs and Enablers
  • 1 day Solar Cells at 25 Cents Apiece (5 cents per watt)
  • 2 hours Foxconn cancelled the reopening of their mfg plants scheduled for tomorrow. Rescheduled to March 3rd. . . . if they're lucky.
  • 1 day Trump reinvented tariffs and it worked
  • 2 hours Hey NYC - Mayor De Blasio declares you must say goodbye to fossil fuels. Get ready to freeze your Virtue Signaling butts off.
  • 7 hours Cheap natural gas is making it very hard to go green
  • 8 hours "For the Public's Interest"
  • 2 days Is cheaper plastics feedstock on the horizon?
Uncertainty Brings An End To The Oil Price Rebound

Uncertainty Brings An End To The Oil Price Rebound

The latest five-day oil rally…

The Complete Guide To Oxygenates

The Complete Guide To Oxygenates

Oxygenates are chemical compounds such…

Nature Journal Tells Obama to Support Keystone XL

Nature Journal Tells Obama to Support Keystone XL

One of the world's preeminent science journals has lent its support to the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline in a recent editorial.

An editorial published in the 29 January issue of Nature, one of the world's leading science periodicals, has called for the Obama administration to rebuff criticism of the Keystone XL project and approve it as long as environmental standards are satisfied.

Related article: From Shale Boom to Refinery Revolution: Massive Investment Potential

While conceding that tar-sands development creates air and water quality issues for Canada, the Nature editorial points out that tar sands will be developed irrespective of the US government's stance as they fall beyond its jurisdiction, and asserts that Obama will garner political capital amongst conservatives via construction of the pipeline, which will enable him to do greater good in other areas.

Mike Hudema, a climate and energy activist with Greenpeace Canada, has criticized the Nature editorial, telling CBC that the crux of the issue is avoiding investment in the use of fossil fuels completely.

By. Marc Howe



Join the discussion | Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News