• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 2 hours The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 1 hour Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 2 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 11 hours Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 1 min Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging
  • 1 day Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 7 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 33 mins Again Google: Brazil May Probe Google Over Its Cell Phone System
  • 20 hours Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 1 day Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 1 day Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 1 day Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 1 day Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
Analysts: SPR Release Won’t Lower Gasoline Prices

Analysts: SPR Release Won’t Lower Gasoline Prices

U.S. drivers are unlikely to…

Who Profits From Iran’s Oil Major Exodus?

Who Profits From Iran’s Oil Major Exodus?

As sanctions on Iran move…

Kurdistan Claims Iraq-Iran Oil Pipeline Violates U.S. Sanctions

Kurdish Flag

The autonomous Iraqi region of Kurdistan has not been informed of plans by the central government that Iraq and Iran agreed to study the potential construction of a pipeline that would export crude oil from fields in Kirkuk via Iran, a senior Kurdish lawmaker told London-based Arab daily Asharq al-Awsat on Tuesday, adding that the Iraq-Iran project was violating U.S. sanctions on Iran.  

Over the weekend, Iran’s Oil Minister Bijan Zanganeh said that Iraq and Iran had reached an agreement to commission a feasibility study of a crude oil pipeline that would export oil from fields in Kirkuk via Iran.  

“In order to raise more legal problems in Kirkuk, Baghdad and Tehran have been trying for a long time to work on a pipeline to transport crude oil from the province to the Iranian territories,” Dilshad Shaaban, deputy chairman of the Kurdistan Parliament’s natural resources committee, told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Will Kirkuk remain part of the Iraqi territory until the completion of the implementation of the project?” Shaaban noted.

In early June, President Masoud Barzani scheduled Kurdistan’s long-awaited independence referendum for September 25, in a vote that may cost Iraq a large chunk of its oil reserves.

The region of Kurdistan is made up of three provinces that are run by an autonomous government. Perhaps the most sensitive point geographically is the city and region of Kirkuk: control over it is still disputed with the central government in Baghdad, not least because the area contains some of the biggest oil fields in the country.

Related: Aggressive U.S. Oil Sanctions Could Bankrupt Venezuela

The oil fields in Kirkuk are divided into two blocs—the Havana and Bay Hassan fields controlled by the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), and another bloc comprising three fields under the control of the central government’s North Oil Company, Shaaban told Asharq Al-Awsat.

If Baghdad actually builds the oil pipeline with Iran, Havana and Bay Hassan fields would not be part of the deal, according to the Kurdish lawmaker, who noted that the pipeline plan is part of Baghdad and Tehran’s attempts to derail the independence referendum process.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News