• 5 minutes USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 11 minutes IEA Sees Global Oil Supply Tightening More Quickly In 2019
  • 14 minutes Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 4 hours $867 billion farm bill passed
  • 14 hours Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 23 mins Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 15 hours U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 14 hours Has Global Peak Diesel Arrived?
  • 5 mins Waste-to-Energy Chugging Along
  • 1 day Sleeping Hydrocarbon Giant
  • 4 hours No, The U.S. Is Not A Net Exporter Of Crude Oil
  • 6 hours What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 6 hours Air-to-Fuels Energy and Cost Calculation
  • 1 day How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 1 day OPEC Cuts Deep to Save Cartel
  • 1 day Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
OPEC+ Gives Oil Bulls Hope

OPEC+ Gives Oil Bulls Hope

OPEC+ has given oil bulls…

Why The OPEC+ Deal Won’t Cut It

Why The OPEC+ Deal Won’t Cut It

OPEC and its partners managed…

Investors Demand Details On Shell’s Emission-Driven Bonus Pay

Shell

In March this year, Shell said that it is proposing a Directors’ Remuneration Policy, subject to shareholder approval at the 2017 Annual General Meeting (AGM) on May 23, 2017. The policy, if approved by shareholders, will be effective until the 2020 AGM, unless shareholders approve other policies in the meantime.

The proposed remuneration policy for executives includes, among other things, new metrics for greenhouse gas (GHG) management, and these now form 10 percent of the annual bonus scorecard, Shell said.

“We have moved to ensure the bonus reflects progress in managing Shell’s GHG emissions,” the company said back then.

But now, a week before the annual general meeting, several investor groups that hold shares in Shell want specific details in advance about how the group will calculate those bonuses, rather than just reporting directors’ remuneration for past periods, Reuters reported on Wednesday, citing representatives of investor groups.

“We would prefer to see public, pre-set greenhouse gas reduction targets using a methodology appropriate to the type of an emission,” Bruce Duguid, director in the stewardship team at Hermes Investment Management, told Reuters.

Shareholders also want Shell to include emissions from all operations, including upstream, in its remuneration policy plan, which has identified three specific business areas: refining, chemical plants, and flaring in upstream assets.

We would love to see that metric be expanded to cover the trickier issue of upstream emissions, from exploration and production. The more difficult issue of the carbon intensity of its reserves hasn't been addressed,” Matt Crossman of Rathbone Greenbank Investments told Reuters.

A climate-activist group of shareholders, named Follow This, is requesting that Shell set and publish targets for reducing emissions that are aligned with the goal of the Paris Climate Agreement to limit global warming to well below 2°C.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News