• 2 minutes CV19: New York 21% infection rate + 40% Existing T-Cell immunity = 61% = Herd Immunity ?
  • 4 minutes Is The Three Gorges Dam on the Brink of Collapse?
  • 7 minutes Sources confirm Trump to sign two new Executive orders.
  • 2 hours In a Nutshell...
  • 2 days No More Love: Kanye West Breaks With Trump, Claims 2020 Run Is Not A Stunt
  • 24 hours Better Days Are (Not) Coming: Fed Officials Suggest U.S. Recovery May Be Stalling
  • 2 days The Coal Industry May Never Recover From The Pandemic
  • 2 hours Is the oil & gas industry on the way out?
  • 2 days A Real Reality Check on "Green Hydrogen"
  • 3 days Why Oil could hit $100
  • 1 day Where is Alberta, Canada headed?
  • 2 days Putin Paid Militants to Kill US Troops
  • 3 days Why Wind is pitiful for most regions on earth
  • 2 days During March, April, May the states with the highest infections/deaths were NY, NJ, Ma. . . . . Today (June) the three have the best numbers. How ? Herd immunity ?
Why The Bakken May Not Come Back

Why The Bakken May Not Come Back

The Bakken shale is already…

Impending Jones Act Changes Could Cause Significant Job Losses In Oil & Gas

A new report from the American Petroleum Institute (API) on Monday predicted significant and damaging impacts from the Customs and Border Protection Agency’s (CBP) 30 proposed revisions on the enforcement of the Jones Act on issues relating to oil and gas vessel activity.

The API, an industry group relied upon for its weekly forecasts on American crude oil inventories, said the amendments, which relate to the redefinition of “vessel equipment” in the CBP’s protocol, could cause large job losses, reduced fossil fuel extraction on U.S. soil, and lower revenues for governments at all levels.

"This report projects that the proposed changes to these long-standing rulings would have widespread negative impacts on American jobs and the national economy, as well as a damaging effect on our national energy security," Erik Milito, upstream operations coordinator for the API, told PR Newswire.

"The study also concludes that these changes would have an abrupt negative impact on oil and natural gas development and investment in the Gulf of Mexico, further impacting consumers and businesses and substantially decreasing government revenue."

Critics of the amendments say the revisions undermine Trump’s goals of achieving American energy independence by increasing regulatory red-tape for oil and gas companies.

Data from the report shows 30,000 lost jobs in 2017 if the new rules are passed, with a majority of cuts expected in the Gulf of Mexico area. Government revenues would fall by $1.9 billion according to the API estimates.

Related: This Non-OPEC Member Just Called For An Extension Of The OPEC Deal

"President Trump's recent executive order on energy independence was an important step toward increasing American competitiveness, and these proposed changes completely undermine the order's purpose by placing unnecessary and harmful burdens on domestic energy production," said Milito. "These proposed changes to the rulings should be immediately withdrawn in order to protect U.S. energy security and allow for consumers and businesses to continue benefitting from America's energy renaissance."

By Zainab Calcuttawala for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News