• 5 minutes Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 11 minutes Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 17 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 1 day The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 6 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 15 hours Pakistan: "Heart" Of Terrorism and Global Threat
  • 1 hour Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 2 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 2 days Newspaper Editorials Across U.S. Rebuke Trump For Attacks On Press
  • 11 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 20 hours Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 14 hours Are Trump's steel tariffs working? Seems they are!
  • 2 days Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 2 days France Will Close All Coal Fired Power Stations By 2021
  • 2 days Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging
  • 1 day Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
Turkey Turmoil Drags Oil Down

Turkey Turmoil Drags Oil Down

While Turkey might not be…

How To Trade The Turkish Crisis

How To Trade The Turkish Crisis

A run on the Turkish…

Enbridge Says New Pipeline Regulations Mean Costly Delays

Enbridge says that new requirements expected to come out of a Minnesota environmental impact statement for work on two major U.S. pipeline projects could lead to the delay of some $5 billion in capital expenditure.

At stake are the Sand Piper light crude oil pipeline and the Line 3 Replacement Project, both running through the state of Minnesota and projected to costs a total of $2.6 billion.

The problem for Enbridge is a new requirement that makes it necessary to receive a final environment impact (EIS) statement before a company can even start the process of obtaining a route permit.

Related: Total’s Impressive Earnings And Generous Dividend Surprises Markets

Enbridge says the new requirement is both “unprecedented” and “contrary to Minnesota law”, as reported by the Financial Post. At the end of the day, Enbridge says the new procedures will result in a two-year delay and all the costs associated with that.

The two pipelines will now likely be pushed back to 2019, but the delay will also allow Enbridge to cut its 2016 capital budget by some 20 percent as costs are deferred.

The hold up in Minnesota is pressured by opposition to the pipelines by environmental groups and Native American tribes who fear potential oil leaks.

Related: Why OPEC Production Freeze Could Pave The Way For Actual Cuts

In 2015, Enbridge spent $1.14 billion on new pipelines, expansion and maintenance, while this year that figure is expected to come in around $900 million.

The Sand Piper pipeline, which will run from North Dakota’s Bakken to Wisconsin, passing through Minnesota. This is the larger of the two pipeline projects, and a joint venture with Marathon Petroleum. The Line 3 Replacement is a reconstruction of a 1960s pipeline from Edmonton in Alberta to Wisconsin.

Enbridge has already invested $195 million into Sand Piper and $65 million into the Line 3 Replacement.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Mike H. on February 19 2016 said:
    Enbridge has yet to pay all it's fines for the 2010 Kalamazoo MI massive spill:

    http://insideclimatenews.org/news/19022016/EPA-Enbridge-negotating-fine-2010-Kalamazoo-river-spill-clean-water-act-dilbit

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News