• 5 minutes Trump will capitulate on the trade war
  • 7 minutes China 2019 - Orwell was 35 years out
  • 12 minutes Glory to Hong Kong
  • 15 minutes ABC of Brexit, economy wise, where to find sites, links to articles ?
  • 24 mins Is Eating Meat Worse Than Burning Oil?
  • 15 mins Diplomatic immunity
  • 5 hours Canada Election Deadlock?
  • 7 hours China & Coal: China's 2019 coal imports set to rise more than 10%: analysts
  • 18 hours Clampdown on Chinese capital flight is shutting down their commercial construction in US
  • 1 day Here's your favourite girl, Tom!
  • 1 day Peaceful demonstration in Hong Kong again thwarted by brutality of police
  • 5 hours Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 5 hours Devaluing the Yuan
  • 1 day IMO 2020:
  • 16 hours Nigeria Demands $62B from Oil Majors
  • 1 day Deepwater GOM Project Claims Industry First
  • 15 hours Fareed Zakaria: Canary in the Coal Mine (U.S. Dollar Hegemony)
ISIS Was Built On Oil

ISIS Was Built On Oil

The Islamic State has been…

Debunking The Top 5 Environmental Disaster Films

Debunking The Top 5 Environmental Disaster Films

Hollywood isn’t exactly known for…

Zainab Calcuttawala

Zainab Calcuttawala

Zainab Calcuttawala is an American journalist based in Morocco. She completed her undergraduate coursework at the University of Texas at Austin (Hook’em) and reports on…

More Info

ETP Says Bakken Pipeline System Up And Running

Pipeline

Both parts of the Bakken Pipeline system, including the Dakota Access, are now online and operating commercially, according to a new press release by the facilities’ main owner, Energy Transfer Partners.

At a combined capacity of 520,000 barrels per day, the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) and its less notorious brother, the Energy Transfer Crude Oil Pipeline (ETCO) transfer crude from the Bakken formation in North Dakota to the U.S. refining hubs of the Gulf Coast and a storage/terminal hub in Illinois. Together, they are called the Bakken Pipeline, which is owned by ETP (38.25 percent stake), MarEn Bakken Company (36.75 percent stake) and Phillips 66 (25 percent stake).

Native American and environmental activists led opposition to the DAPL over the past two years, citing concerns that a portion of the pipeline crossing a lake that connects to the Missouri River could contaminate local water resources in the event of a major leak.

The Associated Press reported in early May that DAPL leaked 84 gallons of oil in South Dakota on April 4th. The four Sioux tribes trying to shut down the pipeline claim the incident supports their argument that the pipeline should be subject to government-ordered environmental review because it could jeopardize drinking water supplies.

The South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources said the spill was quickly contained and cleaned up, and therefore did not represent a real risk to the environment. News of the leak had not been released earlier because the agency only issues statements regarding leaks that could threaten public health, according to environmental scientist Brian Walsh.

Last week, ETP failed to obtain an approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to restart work on the Rover natural gas pipeline in Ohio, after authorities ordered a freeze in horizontal drilling in May. Construction activities have led to 18 incidents of massive spills, pollution and open burning, according to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, which fined ETP $714,000 for the damage to nature. The state is still reviewing many of the incidents.

By Zainab Calcuttawala for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • BlkGld on June 02 2017 said:
    I would also add that that 84 gallon spill (which never even hit the ground) happened during a pre-production pressure test meant specifically to find these types of problems in the system before it goes live.

    There is very little honest reporting associated with this pipeline.
  • Danny DiNardo on June 02 2017 said:
    If you're going to write about a "spill" of 84 gallons instead of 2 barrels, then why not write the capacity of the pipeline is 21,840,000 gallons?

    Why is it that stories of spills always try to sensationalize the event by using gallons as the metric? It seems disingenuous, but yet the pattern is the same in every news account, whenever there is any kind of spill. Once above the reportable threshold, the metric for reporting is barrels, not gallons. But journalists are always ready to inflate that number for effect, by converting the number of barrels to gallons in their stories.
  • Naomi on June 02 2017 said:
    Daily Bakken oil field production is almost twice the capacity of the Bakken pipeline.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play