• 5 minutes Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 11 minutes Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 17 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 14 hours The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 2 hours Pakistan: "Heart" Of Terrorism and Global Threat
  • 1 day Newspaper Editorials Across U.S. Rebuke Trump For Attacks On Press
  • 7 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 7 hours Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 19 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 1 day Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 3 hours Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 1 day Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 20 hours Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
  • 48 mins Are Trump's steel tariffs working? Seems they are!
  • 1 day France Will Close All Coal Fired Power Stations By 2021
  • 1 day Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging

Battle Over Keystone XL Lands Before Nebraska Supreme Court

Nebraska's high court began hearing arguments on Friday in a case examining whether lawmakers short-circuited the regular approval process for TransCanada Corp.'s (TSX, NYSE:TRP) proposed $5.4 billion Keystone XL pipeline.

The debate, which centres on routing and permitting, is not expected to arrive to a conclusion any time soon, Bloomberg reports. However, the court’s ruling could force President Obama’s hand in making a final decision whether to green light the stalled project or delay it indefinitely.

Keystone XL Route
Keystone XL Pipeline — Overall route map. (Courtesy of TransCanada)

Opponents are challenging the constitutionality of Nebraska’s pipeline siting law, filed in May 2012, which gave Governor Dave Heineman authority to approve a route for the Canada-to-Texas proposed pipeline on private land, without having to first go through regulators.

But in February, a Nebraska state judge struck down that law, handing a temporary victory to landowners. The decision forced the U.S. State Department to put on hold its review of project pending a resolution, which might not come until early 2015.

The proposed project would transport crude from the Canadian oil sands in Alberta to refineries on the US Gulf Coast and should counteract some of the pricing pressures bitumen producers are under.

Supporters have said it would be a boon for job creation and domestic energy production, but opponents have warned that fuel extraction from the oil sands —among the most carbon-intensive methods of energy production— would likely increase should the project be approved.

Cecilia Jamasmie of Mining.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • ramon on September 08 2014 said:
    you do not have to buy it from me and I do not have to sell it to you . that will be the attitude of the Canadian government, what you going to do then? if you need them .
  • Philip Branton on September 08 2014 said:
    Hmm we wonder if this judge has ever been told about the battle of "YELLOWSTONE Geo-thermal energy versus the Keystone Pipeline"...!?

    Boomerang 101

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News