• 5 minutes 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 8 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 12 minutes Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 26 mins Trump cancels Denmark visit amid spat over sale of Greenland
  • 25 mins Iran Is Winning Big In The Middle East
  • 43 mins Nor Chicago, nor Detroit: Killings By Police Divide Rio De Janeiro Weary Of Crime
  • 7 hours Not The Onion: Vivienne Westwood Says Greta Thunberg Should Run the World
  • 19 hours Danish Royal Palace ‘Surprised’ By Trump Canceling Trip
  • 1 hour Strong, the Strongest: Audi To Join Mercedes, BMW Development Alliance
  • 9 hours OPEC will consider all options. What options do they have ?
  • 22 hours NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
  • 22 hours Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
  • 19 hours A legitimate Request: France Wants Progress In Ukraine Before Russia Returns To G7
  • 14 hours What to tell my students
  • 9 hours Gretta Thunbergs zero carbon voyage carbon foot print of carbon fibre manufacture
  • 5 hours With Global Warming Greenland is Prime Real Estate
Investors Are Ditching High-Yield Shale Bonds

Investors Are Ditching High-Yield Shale Bonds

Investors in high-yield shale bonds…

Battle Over Keystone XL Lands Before Nebraska Supreme Court

Nebraska's high court began hearing arguments on Friday in a case examining whether lawmakers short-circuited the regular approval process for TransCanada Corp.'s (TSX, NYSE:TRP) proposed $5.4 billion Keystone XL pipeline.

The debate, which centres on routing and permitting, is not expected to arrive to a conclusion any time soon, Bloomberg reports. However, the court’s ruling could force President Obama’s hand in making a final decision whether to green light the stalled project or delay it indefinitely.

Keystone XL Route
Keystone XL Pipeline — Overall route map. (Courtesy of TransCanada)

Opponents are challenging the constitutionality of Nebraska’s pipeline siting law, filed in May 2012, which gave Governor Dave Heineman authority to approve a route for the Canada-to-Texas proposed pipeline on private land, without having to first go through regulators.

But in February, a Nebraska state judge struck down that law, handing a temporary victory to landowners. The decision forced the U.S. State Department to put on hold its review of project pending a resolution, which might not come until early 2015.

The proposed project would transport crude from the Canadian oil sands in Alberta to refineries on the US Gulf Coast and should counteract some of the pricing pressures bitumen producers are under.

Supporters have said it would be a boon for job creation and domestic energy production, but opponents have warned that fuel extraction from the oil sands —among the most carbon-intensive methods of energy production— would likely increase should the project be approved.

Cecilia Jamasmie of Mining.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • ramon on September 08 2014 said:
    you do not have to buy it from me and I do not have to sell it to you . that will be the attitude of the Canadian government, what you going to do then? if you need them .
  • Philip Branton on September 08 2014 said:
    Hmm we wonder if this judge has ever been told about the battle of "YELLOWSTONE Geo-thermal energy versus the Keystone Pipeline"...!?

    Boomerang 101

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play