• 4 minutes China - EU: Xi Says Cooperation Is Mainstream In Their Ties
  • 8 minutes The Mining Industry Has Had It Easy For Far Too Long
  • 11 minutes Lawsuit-Happy Councilor Wants to Take Big Oil to Court
  • 15 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 3 hours Dutch Populists Shock the EU with Election Victory
  • 41 mins Venezuela Says Russian Troops Land to Service Military Equipment
  • 1 hour Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 9 hours Multi-well Pad Drilling Cost Question
  • 19 hours U.S.-China Trade War Poses Biggest Risk To Global Stability
  • 2 hours Public Companies that attended OPEC "THREAT DINNER" at CERRAWEEK must disclose any risks in their SEC Financial filings.
  • 3 hours 3 Pipes: EPIC 900K, CACTUS II 670K, GREY OAKS 800K
  • 2 hours England Running Out of Water?
  • 2 hours Read: OPEC THREATENED TO KILL US SHALE
  • 1 hour Mexico Demands Spain and the Vatican Apologize to Indigenous People for the Spanish Conquest
  • 1 day One Last Warning For The U.S. Shale Patch
  • 1 day European Parliament demands Nord-Stream-ii pipeline to be Stopped
  • 2 days Modular Nuclear Reactors
Alberta’s Price-Correcting Plan Backfires

Alberta’s Price-Correcting Plan Backfires

Alberta’s obligatory production cuts have…

Battle Over Keystone XL Lands Before Nebraska Supreme Court

Nebraska's high court began hearing arguments on Friday in a case examining whether lawmakers short-circuited the regular approval process for TransCanada Corp.'s (TSX, NYSE:TRP) proposed $5.4 billion Keystone XL pipeline.

The debate, which centres on routing and permitting, is not expected to arrive to a conclusion any time soon, Bloomberg reports. However, the court’s ruling could force President Obama’s hand in making a final decision whether to green light the stalled project or delay it indefinitely.

Keystone XL Route
Keystone XL Pipeline — Overall route map. (Courtesy of TransCanada)

Opponents are challenging the constitutionality of Nebraska’s pipeline siting law, filed in May 2012, which gave Governor Dave Heineman authority to approve a route for the Canada-to-Texas proposed pipeline on private land, without having to first go through regulators.

But in February, a Nebraska state judge struck down that law, handing a temporary victory to landowners. The decision forced the U.S. State Department to put on hold its review of project pending a resolution, which might not come until early 2015.

The proposed project would transport crude from the Canadian oil sands in Alberta to refineries on the US Gulf Coast and should counteract some of the pricing pressures bitumen producers are under.

Supporters have said it would be a boon for job creation and domestic energy production, but opponents have warned that fuel extraction from the oil sands —among the most carbon-intensive methods of energy production— would likely increase should the project be approved.

Cecilia Jamasmie of Mining.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • ramon on September 08 2014 said:
    you do not have to buy it from me and I do not have to sell it to you . that will be the attitude of the Canadian government, what you going to do then? if you need them .
  • Philip Branton on September 08 2014 said:
    Hmm we wonder if this judge has ever been told about the battle of "YELLOWSTONE Geo-thermal energy versus the Keystone Pipeline"...!?

    Boomerang 101

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News