• 5 minutes Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 11 minutes Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 17 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 1 day The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 6 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 15 hours Pakistan: "Heart" Of Terrorism and Global Threat
  • 1 hour Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 2 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 2 days Newspaper Editorials Across U.S. Rebuke Trump For Attacks On Press
  • 11 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 20 hours Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 14 hours Are Trump's steel tariffs working? Seems they are!
  • 2 days Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 2 days France Will Close All Coal Fired Power Stations By 2021
  • 2 days Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging
  • 1 day Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
Deciphering The New Caspian Agreement

Deciphering The New Caspian Agreement

The Caspian deal is a…

Oil Prices Fall On Significant Crude Build

Oil Prices Fall On Significant Crude Build

Oil prices fell on Wednesday…

Appalachian Gas Pipeline Expansion Will Raise Carbon Footprint – Study

Bakken Rig

A study released by Oil Change International claims that expanding the natural gas pipeline network from the Appalachian Basin across the country would prevent the United Sates from reaching its goals to reduce carbon emissions.

The report indicates that the 19 expansion projects being considered right now would double the gas output from the Marcellus and Utica formations in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio. The proposed new pipelines would carry the gas to power plants and consumers in the eastern United States.

Stephen Kretzmann, the executive director of Oil Change International, an environmental advocacy, commented “Expanding gas production is a bridge to climate disaster. We have a very firm, compelling international goal of 2 degrees or as close to 1.5 degrees as we can get it, and we are making energy decisions every day that aren't being measured against that goal.”

In the report, Oil Change International calls for a climate test to be made part of the permitting process to ensure that the pipelines and any other projects involving fossil fuels fall within the parameters of national climate change policies. The target number in the United States for reducing emissions is an 83 percent decrease from the levels in 2005 by 2050. According to the study, the Appalachian Basin projects would make that goal unreachable.

Jack Gerard, the president of the American Petroleum Institute countered the report in a statement, in which he said in part: “Right now, our nation is experiencing an energy renaissance. Natural gas production has increased nearly 50 percent over the last decade thanks to technological advances in hydraulic fracturing. With the increase in natural gas production, America continues to lead the world in the reduction of carbon emissions due in part to clean-burning natural gas. American consumers want an energy policy that embraces our abundant natural gas resources and it’s up to leaders at all levels of government to follow the will of the consumer.”

By Lincoln Brown for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News