• 20 mins Bidding Action Heats Up In UK’s Continental Shelf
  • 5 hours Keystone Pipeline Restart Still Unknown
  • 9 hours UK Offers North Sea Oil Producers Tax Relief To Boost Investment
  • 11 hours Iraq Wants To Build Gas Pipeline To Kuwait In Blow To Shell
  • 13 hours Trader Trafigura Raises Share Of Oil Purchases From State Firms
  • 15 hours German Energy Group Uniper Rejects $9B Finnish Takeover Bid
  • 16 hours Total Could Lose Big If It Pulls Out Of South Pars Deal
  • 18 hours Dakota Watchdog Warns It Could Revoke Keystone XL Approval
  • 1 day Oil Prices Rise After API Reports Major Crude Draw
  • 2 days Citgo President And 5 VPs Arrested On Embezzlement Charges
  • 2 days Gazprom Speaks Out Against OPEC Production Cut Extension
  • 2 days Statoil Looks To Lighter Oil To Boost Profitability
  • 2 days Oil Billionaire Becomes Wind Energy’s Top Influencer
  • 2 days Transneft Warns Urals Oil Quality Reaching Critical Levels
  • 2 days Whitefish Energy Suspends Work In Puerto Rico
  • 2 days U.S. Authorities Arrest Two On Major Energy Corruption Scheme
  • 2 days Thanksgiving Gas Prices At 3-Year High
  • 2 days Iraq’s Giant Majnoon Oilfield Attracts Attention Of Supermajors
  • 2 days South Iraq Oil Exports Close To Record High To Offset Kirkuk Drop
  • 3 days Iraqi Forces Find Mass Graves In Oil Wells Near Kirkuk
  • 3 days Chevron Joint Venture Signs $1.7B Oil, Gas Deal In Nigeria
  • 3 days Iraq Steps In To Offset Falling Venezuela Oil Production
  • 3 days ConocoPhillips Sets Price Ceiling For New Projects
  • 5 days Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 5 days Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 5 days Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 6 days $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 6 days Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 6 days Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 6 days Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 6 days Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 6 days Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 6 days Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 6 days Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 7 days Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 7 days Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 7 days Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 7 days U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 7 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 7 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
Geopolitical Monitor

Geopolitical Monitor

Geopoliticalmonitor.com is a Canadian intelligence publication and consultancy. Our team of experts provide a unique Canadian perspective on situations and events that have a substantive…

More Info

How Energy Independence Influences Brazilian Geopolitics

How Energy Independence Influences Brazilian Geopolitics

Brazil is a rare gem, a rising power that has put itself on the path of energy independence thanks to a combination of forward-looking energy policies and newly discovered oil reserves. But what does this actually mean for Brazilian foreign policy?


Energy security is one of those rare issues that most people in the world can agree on. Energy security is the fear of cold winters that sets a place for Russia at Europe’s dinner table. It is the compulsion that might have cost the United States its global pre-eminence, and the exception that so often renders moralistic views of international relations indefensible.  To most countries around the world, energy security is everything: economics, defence, and regime survival wrapped into one.

Thus, Brazil presents an interesting case as a rising power on the road to energy independence. Broadly speaking, Brasilia is able to adopt a foreign policy that is more flexible than some of its counterparts, particularly BRIC countries like China and India. There are two particular areas where this flexibility has been manifest of late: Brazil’s policy towards Iran and the complexion of its defence spending.

Brazil’s position on the Iran nuclear saga seems to have shifted recently. It wasn’t long ago that former President Lula da Silva was embarking on ambitious initiatives aimed at brokering deals to pull Iran out of the noose of international sanctions. This process involved a good deal of stonewalling Washington, and Brazil’s relations with the United States suffered as a result. Enter new Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff and suddenly Brazil’s statements on Iran have been dipped in the language of human rights. Brazil even voted to appoint a UN special investigator to look into Iran’s human rights record last week, the first anti-Iran vote from Brazil in over a decade.

The question of what is driving this Iran policy change and how far it will go are both open to speculation. It may stem from the fact that President Rousseff is seeking to repair some of the damage done to US-Brazilian relations by her predecessor. It’s also possible that she has a developed deep ideological commitment to human rights that will continue to manifest itself in her government’s foreign policy.

What isn’t open to speculation however, is the fact that Brazil’s flexibility stems from it not being beholden to Iran over energy exports. The same cannot be said for fellow BRIC countries China and India, two states that are strategically bound to Tehran regardless of resulting diplomatic or economic damage.

This flexibility assumes greater importance when viewed in the context of the global trend towards multipolarity. This kind of international environment will provide ample opportunities for Brazil to form triangular relationships with other major powers in order to achieve its ends. Since these triangular relationships won’t be framed by energy considerations, Brazil will be free to swoop in and make gains where other energy-beholden rising powers cannot.  Iran is illustrative of this point- Brazil seems to have hung on only until it was no longer in its interest to do so.

Defence spending is also influenced by energy independence. Brazil does not have any credible threats in its region and its defence budget has consequently maintained relatively low spending levels. In 2005, Brazil spent only $9.94 billion on defence. By 2010, the number had risen to $33.5 billion, or 1.6 percent of the country’s GDP, and it will rise again in 2012 to a projected $34.9 billion.

These increases are not only relatively smaller vis-à-vis other BRIC countries, they’re also based on vastly different operational requirements. Brazil’s military modernization seeks to achieve the following: better responses to domestic natural disasters, ‘pacifying’ favelas in major urban centres ahead of the Olympics and World Cup, and perhaps garnering the international prestige commensurate with a future permanent member of the UN Security Council. This inward-looking spending strikes a stark contrast to China’s efforts to establish a force projection capacity, which is soon-to-be complete with an aircraft carrier.  Likewise, they diverge from India’s money-pit quest for a ‘blue sea’ navy. The rationale that’s driving other BRIC countries to push their military capabilities outwards is simple: they are strategically vulnerable in regards to international energy supply lines, thus they need a military that can be projected far and wide.

Brazil learned an important lesson from the oil crises of the 1970s, and as a result it built up a domestic renewable energy industry that has now given its foreign policy a free hand. Of course, whether or not Brazil capitalizes on this hard-won flexibility is a question left to the Ministry of External Relations in Brasilia.

By. Zachary Fillingham

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News