• 3 minutes Nucelar Deal Is Dead? Iran Distances Itself Further From ND, Alarming Russia And France
  • 5 minutes Don Jr. Tweets name Ukraine Whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella. Worked for CIA during Obama Administration, Hold over to Trump National Security Counsel under Gen McCallister, more . . . .
  • 9 minutes Shale pioneer Chesepeak will file bankruptcy soon. FINALLY ! The consolidation begins
  • 12 minutes China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 1 min EU has already lost the Trump vs. EU Trade War
  • 1 day Crazy Stories From Round The World
  • 1 day Science: Only correct if it fits the popular narrative
  • 2 days Iran Burning: Shock Gas Price Hike Triggers Violent Protests After Subsidy Cuts
  • 8 hours Pope Proposes New Sin: Thou Shalt Not Destroy The Harmony Of The Environment
  • 1 day Everything You Need To Know About Trump
  • 15 hours IEA predicts oil demand will grow annually at 1 million barrels a day for the next 5 years
  • 2 days Atty General Barr likely subpeona so called whistleblower and "leaker" Eric Ciaramella
  • 20 mins Water, Trump, and Israel’s National Security
  • 1 day Impeachment Nonsense
  • 18 hours ‘If it saves a life’: Power cut to 1.5 million Californians
  • 2 days What are the odds of 4 U.S. politicians all having children working for Ukraine Gas Companies?
  • 2 days Who writes this stuff? "Crude Prices Swing Between Gains, Losses"
  • 12 hours Pioneer's Sheffield in Doghouse. Oil upset his bragging about Shale hurt prices. Now on campaign to lower expectations, prop up price.
Alt Text

Has Iran Won The War For The Middle East?

The greater Middle East, including…

Alt Text

Oil Prices Up As Iran Prepares For "All Out War"

An American or Saudi military…

Alt Text

War In The Middle East Is China’s Worst Nightmare

Reliant on crude imports from…

Claude Salhani

Claude Salhani

Claude Salhani is the senior editor with Trend News Agency and is a journalist, author and political analyst based in Baku, specializing in the Middle…

More Info

Premium Content

New Breach in the Sanction Wall?

The announcement earlier this week of an agreement between Iran and Pakistan to build a pipeline between the two countries has ruffled some feathers in Washington where the Obama administration, who has been trying to increase pressure on Iran and its nuclear program, see this move as going counter to its policies.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his Pakistani counterpart, Asif Ali Zardari shook hands on Monday, closing the deal seen as controversial in the United States. Indeed, officials in Washington see this gas pipeline project as a move that will further perturb an already rocky relationship with Islamabad.

Iran meanwhile sees this as an opportunity to allow it to sell more natural gas, and in the process increase much-needed revenues to help boost its staggering economy. For the Islamic Republic it is also an important step in establishing alternative routes through which to export its oil and gas products other than through the strategic and easily controlled Straits of Hormuz.

Related article: Can Qatar's Success with Gas-to-Liquids Fuels Be Repeated in the U.S.?

In case of conflict breaking out in the region of the Persian Gulf, blocking the narrow passageway through which much of the free world’s fuel transits would be a relatively easy undertaking. And indeed the Iranians have often threatened they would do exactly that if they were attacked. The Iranians lack the proper means through which to refine their own oil and are forced to export it in a crude form and then reimport it once refined.  In the event of the Straits closing, Iran would very likely be among the very first countries to suffer from such a move.

This planned pipeline would alleviate some of Iran’s dependency on the narrow water passageway.

Washington warned that if the project was to go ahead Pakistan would risk incurring same sanctions under the same rules that are applicable to those imposed on Iran for its continued nuclear policies.

The good news for everyone, except for Iran, however, is that the project though nearly ready on the Iranian side remains far from completion on the Pakistan side, where construction is due to begin only this week.

The Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline, which is to run along the southern part of Iran into neighboring Pakistan will further raise doubts that many inside the Washington Beltway hold regarding just how serious Pakistan remains an ally in the war on terrorism and US and Western efforts to prevent Tehran from getting a nuclear bomb.  Washington has consistently accused Tehran of supporting and financing terrorist groups and activities. Many voices will be raised in Washington in the days ahead to hold back some of the financial aid Pakistan receives from the United States.

Washington’s fears that if – or rather when – Iran becomes a nuclear power it could first raise the likelihood of nuclear proliferation in the Gulf, as several Arab countries will want to follow suit; and second, there are great fears that Iran could supply a dirty bomb to terrorist groups, or groups deemed to engage in terrorist activities by Washington and some of its allies.

The pipeline however is still several years away from completion and before any sanctions are to be considered against Pakistan oil or gas would have to actually start flowing through the pipe. And that is still not for tomorrow.

The pipeline – dubbed the Peace Pipeline - will run a total of 780 km, or 485 miles. Experts estimate that it will require about two years before it can become operational. The initial plan was first introduced in 1994 and was supposed to involve India. Indian officials in Delhi reconsidered the agreement and drew away in 2009 after signing a nuclear deal with the United States.

The Pakistanis themselves are in somewhat of a bind. The government in Islamabad will have to juggle between establishing better relations with a fellow Muslim nation and toeing the line imposed by Washington. Regardless of the outcome it will prove to be a delicate maneuver for the Pakistani government. It will be pulled between taking steps that will please its own people and in the process upsetting Washington and risk loosing some of the financial and military support the United Stated grants Pakistan every year.

It is indeed a very precarious situation for the Pakistanis who face major energy shortages in a country where power outages are becoming more frequent. Thus the urgent need for more fuel.

More likely than not the Pakistanis are placing their hopes that time will help them through this complicated diplomatic waltz and that in the two or three years needed for the pipeline to become operational there may yet be a very different geopolitical reality in the region. Time will tell.

By. Claude Salhani

Claude Salhani, a specialist in conflict resolution, is an independent journalist, political analyst and author of several books on the region. His latest book, 'Islam Without a Veil,' is published by Potomac Books. He tweets @claudesalhani.

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play