• 4 minutes Trump will meet with executives in the energy industry to discuss the impact of COVID-19
  • 8 minutes Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 11 minutes Why Trump Is Right to Re-Open the Economy
  • 13 minutes Its going to be an oil bloodbath
  • 57 mins US Shale Resilience: Oil Industry Experts Say Shale Will Rise Again
  • 44 mins Marine based energy generation
  • 10 hours What If ‘We’d Adopted A More Conventional Response To This Epidemic?’
  • 21 hours The Most Annoying Person You Have Encountered During Lockdown
  • 2 mins China Takes Axe To Alternative Energy Funding, Slashing Subsidies For Solar And Wind
  • 17 hours Trafigura CEO Weir says, "We will see 30% to 35% drop in demand". That amounts to 35mm bbls/day glut ! OPEC+ 10 mm cut won't fix it. It's a DEMAND problem.
  • 12 hours Real Death Toll In CCP Virus May Be 12X Official Toll
  • 22 hours Cpt Lauren Dowsett
  • 23 hours Which producers will shut in first?
  • 6 hours TRUMP pushing Hydroxychloroquine + Zpak therapy forward despite FDA conservative approach. As he reasons, "What have we got to lose ?"
  • 19 hours Today 127 new cases in US, 99 in China, 778 in Italy
  • 23 hours Washington doctor removed from his post, over covid
IWPR

IWPR

IWPR helps people in the world's most challenging environments have the information they need to drive positive changes in their lives — holding government to…

More Info

Premium Content

Implications of the Iraqi Gas Auction: Trouble Between Baghdad and the Provinces

The Iraqi oil ministry’s auction of three natural gas fields last month was angrily opposed by all the governorates in which they are located.

With provincial officials threatening legal action against Baghdad and warning that they will refuse to cooperate with the developers, IWPR assess the significance of the controversy.

What are the implications of the troubled gas auction on the already troubled relationship between Baghdad and the provinces?

The recent dispute between the oil ministry and local authorities has clearly widened the rift between Baghdad and the provinces. Provincial officials in Anbar, Diyala and Basra, where bids were awarded to develop gas fields, all claimed that they were not informed of the auction, leave alone consulted – a charge that the ministry of oil denies.

Baghdad controls all natural resources revenue, but both local and federal authorities claim they have the right to sign contracts and manage projects.

The ministry has been accused of forging ahead with natural resources development without consulting local authorities in the past, and has sparred with the Kurdistan Regional Government and the Shia-majority provinces of Wasit and Basra over natural resources management and contract issues. The addition of Sunni-majority Anbar and Diyala to the mix doesn’t bode well for the oil ministry. Moreover, there are again rumblings about creating a federal region in resources-rich Basra, potentially giving the local government more authority over oil and gas reserves in the province.

What do the provinces want?

Simply put, citizens want Iraq’s oil boom to improve their quality of life. Aside from security, day-to-day life in Iraq is challenging at best. Hospitals, schools, services and jobs are in short supply. Given Iraq’s high unemployment, jobs are especially crucial for the country’s growth and stability. Baghdad maintains that natural resources development will create local employment and has promised governorates one dollar for each barrel of oil that is produced – but citizens and local officials remain sceptical.

Local authorities are demanding more influence over the management of oil and gas in their provinces, and want assurances from the central government that the governorates will economically benefit from the contracts. Provincial officials interviewed by IWPR clearly felt snubbed by Baghdad’s decision to leave them out of the auction, and Anbar officials have threatened to sue the oil ministry. Some believe the provinces will keep quiet if they get a cut of the deals.

The main problem is the absence of a legal framework on natural resources management and contracts. Until a law is passed, the power struggle between the oil ministry and local authorities is likely to continue and could escalate.

Will the disputes affect natural resources development in Iraq?

Possibly. Without the support of local governments, international firms could face logistical challenges, or even possibly security threats, which could affect their operations. The biggest tests will be in Anbar and Diyala, where residents and officials are clearly angered by the deals. Both provinces have been hotbeds of the insurgency. Anbar’s provincial council, which warned Baghdad that it would not accept the deals, spearheaded governorate-wide protests that drew hundreds of demonstrators during the Baghdad auction.

However, David Bender, a Middle East analyst and oil expert with the Washington-based Eurasia Group, told me that despite the risks, international oil companies are eager to invest in Iraq given the country’s huge reserves. For example, Basra’s massive Rumaila field, which produces about 40 per cent of Iraq’s oil, is being developed by BP and the China National Petroleum Corporation. Reuters reported this week that the oil ministry is finalising a 12 billion US dollar Basra gas contract with Royal Dutch Shell and Japan's Mitsubishi.

As Bender points out, risks vary by province and region: Basra is considered more stable than Anbar and Diyala, while big firms are reluctant to work in the Kurdish north – Iraq’s safest region – until the Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad settle their dispute over who has the authority to sign contracts.

By. Tiare Rath

This article originally appeared in IWPR.net and is produced by the Institute for War and Peace Reporting, www.iwpr.net


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage






Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News