• 3 minutes Nucelar Deal Is Dead? Iran Distances Itself Further From ND, Alarming Russia And France
  • 5 minutes Don Jr. Tweets name Ukraine Whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella. Worked for CIA during Obama Administration, Hold over to Trump National Security Counsel under Gen McCallister, more . . . .
  • 9 minutes Shale pioneer Chesepeak will file bankruptcy soon. FINALLY ! The consolidation begins
  • 12 minutes China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 6 hours EU has already lost the Trump vs. EU Trade War
  • 14 hours Judge Orders Trump To Release Tax Returns
  • 3 hours Who writes this stuff? "Crude Prices Swing Between Gains, Losses"
  • 2 hours Climate Change Consensus Shifts in Wind, But Gas Is Still the Right Move
  • 4 hours World oil demand will keep growing until 2030, climate-damaging emissions longer, says IEA
  • 9 hours Shale Gas News – November 9, 2019
  • 12 hours ''Err ... but Trump ...?'' #thedonkeystays
  • 5 hours Does .001 of Atmosphere Control Earth's Climate?!
  • 15 hours Offshore SE Asia: Offshore OFS Could Get Major Boost in SE Asia
  • 5 hours Atty General Barr likely subpeona so called whistleblower and "leaker" Eric Ciaramella
  • 14 hours The lies and follies of the "cry wolf" enviros: No more fire in the kitchen: Cities are banning natural gas in homes to save the planet
  • 16 hours Saudi Aramco IPO Will Not Save Kingdom
  • 5 hours Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden, Ukraine Oil & Gas exploration company Burisma, and 2020 U.S. election shenanigans
  • 15 hours China's Renewables Boom Hits the Wall
Alt Text

Why Russia Won’t Abandon OPEC+ Just Yet

Russian President Vladimir Putin had…

Alt Text

Is China Caving To U.S. Oil Sanctions?

China’s imports of Venezuelan oil…

Alt Text

The End Of Syria’s “Pipeline War”

There’s a ton of news…

Eurasianet

Eurasianet

Eurasianet is an independent news organization that covers news from and about the South Caucasus and Central Asia, providing on-the-ground reporting and critical perspectives on…

More Info

Premium Content

Uzbekistan, Gazprom Settle On 5 Year, $2.5B Gas Deal

The deal struck at the start of April has been cast as historic for how long it runs before expiring — long enough to ensure some certainty of cash transfers in economically uncertain times, but not so long as to make the hedge feel semi-permanent. Gazprom has historically favored calculating gas supply agreements in Central Asia in decades rather than single years.

Despite that spin, the deal evidently signals a noteworthy withdrawal by Russia from the Central Asian market. Gazprom bought 6.2 billion cubic meters of gas from Uzbekistan in 2016 and is buying only 5 billion cubic meters this year, so the five-year deal represents another drop.

And Gazprom has recently reiterated that it has no intention of resuming gas supplies from Turkmenistan.

As to the question of why Gazprom is buying the gas when it has more than enough of its own, the explanation is offered succinctly by Mikhail Krutikhin, an analyst with RusEnergy, writing in Russian weekly magazine New Times.

“Gazprom sells its Uzbek gas to the southern regions of Kazakhstan, and in exchange on the Kazakhstan-Russian border it receives fuel for its gas refinery in Orenburg [in Russia]. This plant is heavily reliant on these foreign deliveries, which average around 8 billion cubic meters annually. And these substitution schemes, whereby the deliveries are partly compensated for by the gas from Uzbekistan remains in place, although the Kazakh are gradually working out the supply to their southern regions with their own gas, which will make Uzbek deliveries less critical than they are now,” he wrote. Related: Goldman’s $50 Forecast May Prove Bullish

Krutikhin looks at the matter from an understandably Russian perspective and speculates about the implications of Kazakhstan gradually meeting its own demands internally.

The survival of the Orenburg plant would remain in doubt,” he said.

But significance for Uzbekistan is hardly any less grave since it would — as is happening to Turkmenistan now — be reduced to a dwindling set of options about where to export its gas other than China.

That said, Uzbekistan currently struggles to meet even internal demand, leading to thousands of households having to go without gas supplies at times of peak demand, such as in the winter. A gradual transition to a market-based internal distribution could prove more advantageous than any deal with Gazprom, but that scenario would require a substantial improvement in household incomes if it is not to cause deep and perilous discontent.

Gazprom’s relationship with Uzbekistan goes back many years.

In 2002, it signed a strategic partnership deal with Uzbekneftegaz that envisioned its participation in production sharing agreement (PSA) projects to pump gas in Uzbekistan. That is now bearing fruit.

In 2004, Gazprom began producing gas at the Shahpahty field under a PSA. Between August 2004 and July 2010, the field saw an output of 1.5 billion cubic meters of gas.

In 2006, Uzbekneftegaz and Gazprom entered another agreement on the conditions for joint explorations at investment blocks in the Ustyurt region, where reserves of gas are estimated at around 120 billion cubic meters of gas. At the end of the year, Uzbekneftegaz granted Gazprom exploration licenses for seven investment blocks — investment into exploration was valued at $400 million.

A breakthrough came in 2009, when the Dzhel natural gas field was found on the Ustyurt plateau. A PSA is reportedly in the works there too, but it is unclear what stage things are at on this front.

Both Shahpahty and Dzhel are located in the remote western deserts of Uzbekistan. Related: Petrobras Reports 2.74M Bpd Daily Output For March

In February, Alisher Sultanov, chairman of Gazprom affiliate company Gas Project Development Central Asia, or GPD, predicted that there were imminent plans to sign a PSA between Gazprom and Uzbekneftegaz on yet another investment block — “Independence of Uzbekistan” (Uzbekiston Mustakilligi), in the southern Surkhandarya province.

“We plan to sign the PSA during the visit of the president [of Uzbekistan] to Russia in April,” he said at an intergovernmental commission in Tashkent on cooperation between Russia and Uzbekistan.

Sultanov admitted that the project was fraught with complications.

“This is not the easiest field, the geology and the gas content is complicated,” he said.

And that PSA was indeed signed during President Shavkat Mirziyoyev’s visit to Moscow — making it the second PSA between Gazprom and Uzbekistan — although no useful details have been divulged by either party. The deal appears to require the near-site construction of a gas refinery facility, which implies a serious commitment.

While Gazprom may not be interested in buying huge amounts of Uzbekistan’s gas, it evidently sees a commercial future in investing into producing fuel there.

By Eurasianet.org

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play